good evening folks I want to thank you
for inviting me into your home tonight
to talk to you about an extremely
important issue to you I I basically uh
I'm here to talk about the United States
Constitution and our government and some
of the principles that uh you need to
understand most thoroughly so that you
can have an effective opportunity to
exercise your constitutional rights the
whole purpose of this is that you
understand that these these rights come
from God okay that they are God inspired
God is the one who who endowed us with
these rights and that this constitution
merely
offers a legitimate program to protect
those rights or to secure those rights
and the blessings of those rights on
ourselves and on our children for all
time it's important that you understand
that the constitution
is uh got inspired it's important that
you understand that a lot of the
principles that are in the Constitution
actually come out of the Holy Bible okay
and it's very important that you
understand that these Constitution
allows each of you each to be a king or
queen in your own right as long as you
recognize one principle that you don't
ever create a situation where you take
away the rights of another so the whole
point of of having the Constitution is
so that all of us can have the rights
equally and and as long as we respect
our neighbor and allow them also to have
the rights equally the the protections
are are going to last forever as and the
reality is that
we are going to get thoroughly into your
Constitution we want you to find a
constitution wherever you can and we are
going to basically take you step by step
through some of the most important parts
of this constitution so that you can
better exercise your rights in a timely
fashion now the facts are simple if you
don't know your rights you don't have
any rights and that's just the way it is
and if you certainly couldn't exercise
those rights timely if you don't know
what they are so what's going to happen
is they're going to tell you what your
rights are and do you think they're
going to tell you in your favor
certainly not
now we've come a long way to put this
program on to help you
by the way my name is Carl Miller I want
to thank you again for inviting me into
your home we're going to proceed with
Vigor I should tell you a few things
about me that I'm a prior service
Soldier I serve three combat tours
Republic of Vietnam I should tell you
that I was a participant in the top
secret project called Blue Book where
the officers in the jungle smelled a rat
in the wood pile and they decided to
pull their their top soldiers aside
and they come on over here let's come on
over here we want to talk to you and
they took their top soldiers in the
corner and they started teaching them
things like duty honor country pride in
the core they taught us history they
taught us all kind of a programming as
far as what's going on in our government
they taught us the Constitution we had
to be able to Rattle the Constitution
off just like we would any Manual of
arms and this all took place totally top
secret so that we wouldn't offend any
chains of command or any uh presidential
problems similar to what uh
happened between General McArthur yeah
the bottom line is uh this was taken
totally upon their own shall we say
careers to pull this thing off and they
this happened all throughout a lot of
the military services in Vietnam Marine
Corps Air Force Army we all they all
pulled aside their best people and they
started putting everything on and
teaching us our constitution so I'm
going to try and then instill in you
that flame that was instilled in me over
25 years ago in which I have been I have
been transferring ever since I have been
fighting tooth and nail to defend the
Constitution I have helped thousands and
thousands and thousands of other people
do the same I teach people how to be
their own counsel to stand up in courts
of Law and be able to exercise their
constitutional rights in a timely and
effective Manner and the good Lord
willing I'll be able to keep doing that
so why don't we uh right now try and get
into some parts of the Constitution the
most important thing that I can teach
you about this constitution
is the importance of reading it
you must read the Constitution and
understand what physically is involved
you must know your rights and timely
assert them that is your burden if you
do not then a legal term called latches
incurs latches is a legal term which is
defined as an as latches as a specie of
action where in a party of reasonable
intelligence and integrity having a
right to take an action as is prescribed
by law and having failed to timely do so
loses all right to proceed so what is
actually happening out there folks is
that latches is incurring because most
people don't read their constitution and
know what's involved so then you are
left to being told well that's what it
means okay so you just got to do what
you got to do and you're told and
they're going to tell you in favor of
them they're not going to tell you in
favor of you so it's better for you to
read the book and understand what's in
it it's not a very big book I I highly
recommend the book
I you can get several versions uh a lot
of times you contact your Congressman my
congressman Dominic vincentini state
senator supplied this one for me uh John
Kuhn a Libertarian candidate has
supplied several also some of these
folks just check with your local uh
Congressman or State Rep a lot of times
you can they'll just give you one if you
cannot find one go down to your United
States uh government building here in
the Detroit vicinity it's called the
McNamara building on the first floor
and what we do then is we go into the
government printing office I'm usually
there about a buck
but I highly recommend you go get one I
I don't leave home without mine I
usually have three or four of them
someplace and I hand them out also
myself I give them out to whoever I I
think one of the most kindest things I
can do to person is given this book and
show them how it works
this book is kind of like a Genie in a
Bottle
if you know how to stroke this book I'm
telling you the genie comes out and it
usually with a force that that you it
will be clearly recognized in any court
in the land
now that doesn't mean it'll be easy
you might have to work a little bit but
basically there's an argument and it
comes like this
if I violate your rights you may or may
not know about it if you know about it
you may or may not be able to do
something about it if you do have an
ability to do something about it you may
or may not have the financial
wherewithal to go to a finished program
if you do have the financial wherewithal
you may not have the intestinal
fortitude to go to a finished program so
most of the time your governments and
your your abusive Personalities in
government or your corporations uh
pretty much have card Blanche to to
injure you because in 99.9 percent of
the cases nobody most people will not
proceed but every now and then you run
into that one hard nut and he doesn't
quit or she doesn't quit till
the cows come home and what happens is
that person will prevail and those are
the people that are actually generating
better protections and better
constitutional rights for you those are
the ones that are going to the Supreme
Courts and the courts of appeals and
what have you that are pushing that are
spending their life funds to allow you
to have the benefit but if you aren't
there to catch the benefit then you you
the benefit is lost so
we're going to get right into the
Constitution we're going to teach you
some things about it
pay attention because we're really doing
this out of an act of love for you and
we're hoping to God you're going to pick
up on it and pay attention Okay now
I'm gonna put one Constitution down here
so the folks can see it I will open this
up from time to time to demonstrate
things to you I will basically try and
read out of another Constitution
so that we can better show you some of
the things that are involved now it's
important that you understand that this
constitution is in writing
it's important that you understand that
it is a legal document okay
that it was ratified
by all of the members
in a congress together right
and that that document can be you can
get all the signatures on the document
okay and it's important that you
understand
that there was an offer government
offered to govern there was a
consideration the citizens considered
how they were going to be governed and
government promised that they would
govern by Constitution and there was an
agreement the citizens agreed that if
Government promised there would be a
government by Constitution that they
would agree to allow the Constitution
into Force now there's a unique
situation here it's very rare when you
find the Friday of the first part which
is the congressman officers of the
government
who are also parties of the second part
as representatives of We the People The
Republic and when they signed the
document they signed the document as
officers of government agreeing to the
Constitution and simultaneously as
officers of Representatives of the
people
in the Republican form of government and
when they signed that document that
constituted a iron-clad contract in
writing enforceable and court of law
pursuant to the statute of frauds here
in the state of Michigan that's
566.132 Michigan compiled laws act which
basically States anything in writing is
enforceable in the court of law pursuant
to the statute of frauds now all we're
asking is that they enforce the contract
we want them to enforce the contract in
other words if we read something in here
and we got a good reason for why we
believe it's the way it is then they
should honor that and they should honor
it in favor of you the query intended
and expressly designated beneficiary but
I'll get into that a little later
article 6 paragraph two of the
Constitution this is called the
supremacy clause of the Constitution
it's located at article 6. everybody see
that
paragraph two which is going to start
right here and I'm going to read it to
you okay and basically what it says is
this this constitution
and the laws of the United States which
shall be made in pursuance thereof
and the treaties made or which shall be
made
under the authority of the United States
shall be the supreme law of the land and
the judges in every state shall be bound
thereby
anything
in the Constitution are laws of any
state to the contrary are
notwithstanding when they say
notwithstanding that means
notwithstanding in law that means that's
a legal definition not what standing
means not with standing in law
now a very important case Marbury versus
Madison 5 U.S 137 it's recorded at
volume Five
right here it's an 8 19 1803 case
Marbury versus Madison it's recorded in
Volume 5 page 137.
now basically what this case States and
and I'm telling you right now if you
want to use a case to cite for any
purpose in court you have to read the
case if you haven't read the case you
haven't read the case and formed a basis
upon which a logical determination in
your mind could have been reached to
form an opinion as to why you should do
what you're going to do then the judge
will throw your case out so read your
cases don't just quote cases because
they won't you won't win if the judge
ever pins you down and starts asking you
some merits of the case and you can't
even understand what the case is about
nine times out of ten he's just going to
throw your case in in the in the can so
make sure you read the case this is one
of the leading cases
in the history of the United States of
America the opinion of the Court was
given by the honorable Judge John
Marshall Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court his opinion was anything
that is in Conflict his non-void of law
clearly he said that for a secondary law
to come in conflict with the supreme law
was illogical for certainly the supreme
law would Prevail over all other law and
certainly our forefathers had intended
that the supreme law would be the basis
of Allah and for any law to come in
Conflict would be null and void of law
it would bear no power to enforce it
would bear no obligation to obey it
would report to settle as if it never
existed for unconstitutionality would
date from the enactment of such a law
not from the date so branded in an open
court law no courts are bound to uphold
it and no citizens are bound to obey it
it operates as a mere nullity or a
fiction of law which means it doesn't
exist in law now let me give you an
example in today's timing as to how
effective this is this argument is so
effective that it literally nullifies
the Brady Bill it nullifies the crime
bill it takes away the right of the
people to keep and bear arms on these 19
weapons that turn into 159 weapons
it stops this 666 bill it just went
through that they're trying to take away
the Fourth Amendment you see because
they have no power to pass a law that's
in conflict with the United States
Constitution and it's automatically
non-envoid of law from its Inception not
from the date you go to court and brand
it as unconstitutional now I want to get
that real clear
a lot of people think that they got to
go to court and brand it
unconstitutional I'm here to tell you if
you know your arguments and you can show
your arguments
most of the time you will win
every now and then you run into a hard
nose but I'll show you how to deal with
him too okay but for now I want
everybody that's got a chance to go out
to learn your Constitution your article
six paragraph two of your Constitution I
want you to
to pay attention to what's going on here
learn to read about this Marbury versus
Madison Case this right here is an
example of what is called Shepherd
citations Shepherd citations is a group
of reporters that go through and keep
track of all the court cases that have
come before the courts especially the
Supreme Court and they clarify before
the court all of the cases each one of
these little numbers here represents
somebody hiring a lawyer and going to
the Supreme Court every one of these
there's nine pages of these folks
almost 200 years worth it goes against
this case Marbury versus Madison
and I want to tell you this case is
still supreme law of land if it wasn't
you would see O's in here where it was
overturned okay
you don't see any O's
there aren't any O's
that means the case is standing there'd
be an o in this column right next to
here you don't see any O's because
there's no case that could come up
against this case That's How Strong this
case is folks
now this is nine pages each one this is
two pages each
there's nine pages of this this
represents if I was to to try and teach
you what this represents if I was
building a wall from here to the Moon
out of bricks
that's what that would mean in legal
terms
because that's how solid this case is so
it's very important that you understand
your Constitution is an ironclad
contract in writing enforceable and
Court law it's very important that you
understand article 6 paragraph two the
supremacy clause which says the
Constitution and the laws and pursuance
thereof and the treaties made which
shall be made under the authority of the
United States shall be the supreme law
of the land the judges in every state
shall be bound thereby anything in
conflict or repugnancy is null and void
of law it Bears no power to enforce no
obligation to obey purports to settle as
if it never exists an
unconstitutionality dates from the
enactment no courts are bound to a poll
that no citizens are bound to obey it
now that is one of the most important
lessons that I can teach you on the
Constitution so that you can understand
how strong this document is
and when I go to the law library and I
hit some of these law libraries it's
wall-to-wall books folks I mean it's
like I take people down there and their
chins on the ground and then I tell them
there's three floors of this place just
like this filled to the brim with books
and books and did you know that in every
one of those cases this little book
right here this one right here folks
controls every single book in that law
library every single one
every single book in that law library is
controlled by this little book so can
you understand how important it is for
you to know what's in this little book
so that you can effectively call on that
kind of a commanding knowledge
okay
it is absolutely vital that you get a
hold of one of these books and start
learning it and don't let anybody take
away your constitutional rights
you cannot you can't even give your
constitutional rights away you have to
voluntarily acquiesce by signing a
document on a Miranda release form
that's how hard it is to give away your
constitutional rights we don't want you
to give away any of your raise we want
you to know these rights backward
forward upside down another we want you
to be able to Rattle them off our
soldiers could do it
then they did it with with the great
love in their heart and the pride and
the duty that they hold in their heart
and they swore on a sacred oath that
they defend the Constitution against all
enemies foreign and domestic and they
perform their duties to the best of
their ability so help them God and by
God they do
both in the service and out of the
service okay
we defend the Constitution to the death
we Never Surrender We Are Soldiers above
all and we love our country and our flag
and our constitution we are what the
term is under the
military code of conduct I am an
American fighting Soldier I serve the
forces which guard my country in this
constitutional way of government I am
prepared to give my life if necessary in
defense of that Constitution and that's
exactly what we're going to do
so I want you to pay attention a lot of
brave soldiers have died to pay for this
book so that you could have the right
and the least you could do for your own
self sake is to learn what's in this
book and be able to argue effectively
what's in this book you would be amazed
how many times you can win if you just
have this book and know what's in it
we're going to go into some other
arguments here we're going to try and
show you how to really effectively use
this book okay
now that everybody's got that in hand
the next thing we're going to start
teaching you is things like about the
Second Amendment
the Second Amendment is one of the
biggies that everybody talks about today
and the one that gets railroaded
probably the most the next is the Fourth
Amendment and the Fifth Amendment okay
but the second amendment is one of the
most vital amendments here because our
forefathers had such an important
understanding of life liberty and
pursuit of happiness that was the first
amendment that they turned around and
realized that without the right to
protect that first right they didn't
have that right so the Second Amendment
they they instituted the right of the
people to keep in carry arms and their
rights shall not be infringed
now they started out by seeing a
well-regulated militia being necessary
for the maintenance of a free state
okay
isn't that a true statement folks a
well-regulated militia is necessary for
the security of a free state that's just
a true statement so is oranges are
orange that's why they call them oranges
okay but that doesn't have any legal
precedence in theory
the most important part about that
second amendment is it says the right of
the people
and the Supreme Court has ruled in
hundreds of cases whenever it says the
right of the people it means the right
each of every single citizen to possess
the right equally
now a lot of guys like to hand out this
Manola that well that's a collective
right you got to be a member of the
militia that's all who done you don't
have to be a member of a militia you all
you have to do is be an American you
have the right
the right to keep in carry arms and that
right shall not be in French now you
will know it after in Fringe there is no
sub paragraph a b c d e f g which would
stipulate as to what would be an
acceptable infringement
so all infringement is forbidden
now who says so you say so
do you see that does everybody see that
you say so who are you I'm an American
and I'm telling you you're infringing my
rights you're stealing my rights I I
claim infringement I claim encroachment
I claim impingement I claim usurpation I
claim you're stealing my right
because that's what they're doing
and I ask them what is it you don't
understand about the word infringement
because that's exactly what it says when
you look in Black slaw dictionary that's
another thing I want to bring up
you want to talk to these people in
court
you want to get a hold of one of these
books right here
it's called Black's Law Dictionary you
would be absolutely amazed
what's in Black's Law Dictionary this is
the exact words that you need
to be able to definitively
Define the word game problem that we are
Hamming with these people today they
like to keep changing the words
but guess what the words in this book
are the words that were written when we
were in the Constitution when it was
signed
and the definitions that are in this
book are enforceable in a court of law
you can bring this book into court and
pull it open and say this is the one
judge and they got to listen
and that's the way it is
so for sure if you're going to be in
this
go down to one of your bookstores uh
whichever you may have in your area
Barnes and Noble or
any one of the dozens of decent
bookstores and get a copy of black slaw
dictionary you need that to be in this
because this is kind of like
defining the map of how to get from A to
B you have to have this book to be able
to pull it out so you can turn around
and tell them hey
don't trample my rights I take a real
damn you today
another good book you can pick up on the
Constitution is this
this American Constitution put out by
West Publishing Company
this goes into a whole lot of
widened arguments as to your
Constitution now after I'm finished
talking you're going to have a new
concept of Constitution and how it works
you're going to understand that it's
what you say it is
if you got an honest trade now I'll give
you a perfect example now the First
Amendment basically talks about the
right of life liberty and pursuit of
happiness right
that isn't the right to work part of
right of life liberty and pursuit of
happiness got a right to work right
contract your labor your skill in your
time of life as you see fit right does
that make sense to you that's the First
Amendment right another First Amendment
right would be the right to travel
freely unencumbered
see no State can require you to have a
license to travel freely uncomfort and
we'll go into that and show you how that
is is taken care of okay
the bottom line is you need to learn as
much as you absolutely possibly can in
the shortest possible time about your
Constitution because I'm telling you
right now as we speak they are trying to
curtail that Constitution and take away
rights that you have that have been
given to you from your forefathers
there's only one thing that's going to
stop that well maybe two there's two
things so the first thing that's going
to stop that if all of us get together
get a hold of one of these books and
start shaking and say whoa or see we're
not letting you take away that
Constitution
this is America we got an American flag
and a pool out front
last time I checked this is United
States of America we got a constitution
here and you ain't touching that
Constitution
so you call up that bill McCullum in
Washington and you tell him he's the guy
that's sponsored that 666 Bill to take
away the Fourth Amendment right to have
a search warrant
you get a hold of them and I'll give you
his number later on in the speech here
can you call that joker and you say Sir
what is it you don't understand about
your oath above us we kind of like you
to leave the Constitution alone matter
of fact we'd like you to make it
stronger than it is not take nothing
away from it period
and we resent the hell out of you taking
an oath of office to protect the
Constitution and we put you in office
and the first thing you do when you get
in there is try and Scuttle the
Constitution and flush it down the
toilet we're not going to put up with
that stuff we want you to understand
that real clearly
the second way we can do it is if
necessary and proper are malicious can
come together and decide to tell these
people that are given Aid and comfort to
the enemies of our country by breaking
down our laws that you have broken the
law of Title 18 United States code
section 2381 which says that in the
presence of two witnesses to the same
overreact or in an open court of law if
you fail the timely move to protect and
defend the Constitution of the United
States and honor your oath of office you
are subject to the charge of capital
felony treason and upon conviction you
will be taken by the policy to the
nearest business intersection and by the
negative dead the body to remain in
state until dusk as an example to anyone
who take the role of office lightly you
see without that oath of office this
constitution is worthless
that's why we have you take that oath of
office so that we know you will honor
the south of office and that you will
keep our constitution we don't want
anybody taking our constitution away and
we're here to tell you right now don't
do it
we'll take a damn view of it we probably
will charge you
and we're not fooling around
okay
now let's get into some other things in
the Constitution the bottom line here is
you have to know
to be able to exercise your Constitution
the most important parts about your
Constitution are in your first ten
amendments okay
it's lead the right of the people
to keep in carry arms shall not be
infringed
and that right shall not be infringed
you must claim you're right if you want
to have it
you have to be willing to do that and if
they are going to take your right then
you have to be willing to challenge them
whatever it costs now the bottom line is
any law that comes in conflict with that
what do we talk about in article 6
paragraph two if any law shall come in
conflict with this the supreme law what
happens it's non-voidable it Bears no
power to enforce no obligation to obey
purports to settle as if it never exists
in unconstitutionality dates from the
enactment of such a law not from any
date so Brandon Norman Court a lot so
what happened to the Brady Bill folks
canceled due to leg interest
okay
what happened to the crime bill with the
gun infringements if any portion of the
bill be unconstitutional the whole bill
is unconstitutional
because why repugnancy okay
it's repugnant to the United States
Constitution it's null and void of law
it Bears no power to enforce no
obligation no big reports to settles
that never existed which case said so
Marbury versus Madison 5 us-137 1803
that's how important that case is
that's why you got to go down to your
law library and read
okay so Marbury versus Madison is
extremely important it's important to be
able to read the case understand what
they're talking about now
other cases that are involved are your
rights to Due Process like under your
fourth and fifth and sixth amendments
right the right of the people to be
secure in their houses
the right of the people to be secure in
their person houses papers and effects
against unreasonable searches and
seizures shall not be violated and no
warrant shall issue but upon probable
cause supported by oath or affirmation
and particularly describing the place to
be searched in the person or things to
be seized and obviously that one imply
that would imply
that would imply that he'd gone before a
judge and said this is the guy he did it
this is the crime that was done and this
is the evidence we're looking for judge
and we'd like to get a warrant and we're
swearing everything we told Jesus the
God's truth and then they can come over
and ain't search till it all freezes
over okay
does that sound logical to you now
that's what Bill 666 is trying to throw
out they don't want you to have that
right anymore now it's important for you
to immediately jump to the Ninth
Amendment what does the Ninth Amendment
say enumeration in this constitution of
certain rights shall not be construed to
deny or disparage others retained by the
people now basically what that means in
simplest of terms Congress has no
authority to add on to the constitution
in such a way that would take away
rights previously guarantee what seems
to be Mr mccollum's problem does he not
read The King's English
laughs
excuse me
simply spoken he has no authority to
pass this 666 Bill the Congress had no
authority to pass this Brady Bill
they had no authority to pass this crime
bill because it clearly infringed on the
United States Constitution I don't care
how nobly issue it was I don't care how
learned the people claim to be
they weren't learning enough
because if they were learning they would
have understood the Ninth Amendment
forbids adding on to the Constitution by
any laws whatsoever that takes away
rights to the previously guarantee
let's go on let's hit the 10th Amendment
the power's not delegated to the United
States what is this what are they
talking about here the power is not
delegated to the United States
by the Constitution
nor prohibited by it
to the states
are reserved to the states respectfully
or to the people
see this is a limited contract
this contract is designed to limit
government
and when you get into your police power
as you start understanding your police
Powers almost you'll hear this all the
time well we have police Powers Broad
and sweeping police Powers you look up
blacks Law Dictionary and police Powers
it says the law of imminent domain of a
state or political subdivision to an AG
laws for the common good and Welfare and
a curb crime and in great big black
letters it says within constitutional
limitations see the Tenth Amendment well
when they're talking about C to the 10th
Amendment this is the tenth amendment
they're talking about
now do they have powers to take away
previous rates guaranteed under the
Constitution the answer is obviously no
they don't
obviously the Ninth Amendment sets a
clear limit on that
what is it these guys don't understand
about their constitution
they pass these Brady bills they pass
these crime bills they pass these 666
bills to take away your Fourth Amendment
right requiring a search warrant what is
it that they don't understand about the
locks on the Constitution now do you see
how wise our forefathers were they knew
they knew history and they knew that
history repeats itself if people forget
so what they did is they set a standard
very importantly
toward the end of the contract they
clearly stipulated exactly
what limits would be there
you see
and it clearly stipulated that no power
has existed to take away rights that
were previously guaranteed so how
therefore is this being done
I'll tell you how it's being done
because they want to
and they're not doing it by law
now why are they getting away with it
because most of the people don't know
any better and if you don't know your
rights and you don't timely assert them
latch is incurs latches being a specie
of action we're in a party of reasonable
intelligence and integrity having a
right to take an action as is prescribed
by law and having Mayo to timely do so
loses our right to proceed so by you
acquiescing by not jumping up and saying
hey
Hold the Line Chester you ain't touching
that Fourth Amendment you aren't
touching that second amendment
we're not putting up with that stuff you
took an oath of office we're going to
hold you to it you violate that oath of
office we're going to charge you with
capital felony trees and under Title 18
United States Gold section 2381. what
difference does it make if they're an
open Rebellion against the United States
or if they're breaking down the laws
creating a rebellion isn't that giving
Aiden Comfort to the enemies of our
country it most certainly is and it's
called sedition treason by sedition
okay
now we got to start coloring these guys
and telling them hey what is it you
don't understand about the constitution
in your oval of office we're going to
clearly correct that in the short
interim if you don't want to fix it we
will remove you
and that's our duty and our
responsibility now when Benjamin
Franklin walked out of all the hearings
to set up this constitution a lady
reporter walked up to him and asked him
what is it we have now
and he turned to her and told her we
have a republic if we can keep it
obviously the burden is on us to make
sure we keep it so I'm asking you to get
a hold of one of these constitutions and
let's plan on keeping it all right now
let's get into some more of the
arguments on the Constitution
your fifth amendment let's pull up your
fifth amendment no person shall be held
to answer for a capital or otherwise
Infamous crime unless on the presentment
or indictment of a grand jury accepting
cases arising in the land or Naval
forces or in the militia when an actual
service in time of War
or public danger nor shall any person be
subject to the same offense be twice put
in Jeopardy that's the double jeopardy
statue of life or limb nor shall be
compelled in any crime criminal case to
be a witness against himself that's a
self-incrimination defense nor be
deprived of life liberty or property
without due process alone that's your
equal protection clause
you have an equal right to all of all of
your rights under the law and you have a
right to do process a law matter of fact
if they don't give you due process allow
title V United States code section 556-d
is clear and specific and it says if
they deny a due process of the law all
jurisdiction ceases automatically
that's that's title five United States
code section 556-d also 557 and section
706 of that code in other words if they
deny you due process at any time and you
can prove it you can you can force a
showdown and you can turn around and say
well they might have had jurisdiction in
one time judge but they lost it when
they denied me due process
all right now
the other part sorry you cannot deny
them life liberty property without due
process alone or shell private property
be taken for public use without just
compensation you know how many times do
you hear about that today I mean it's
incredible
the sixth amendment is another important
one all of them are important but there
are more important ones all right and
all criminal prosecutions the accused
shall enjoy the right to a speed in
public trial by an impartial jury of the
state and District wherein the crime
shall have been committed which district
shall have been previously as
ascertained by law and to be informed of
the nature and the cause of the action
and accusation to be confronted with the
witnesses against him that's the right
to confront your accusers to have
compulsory process for obtaining
Witnesses in your favor that's the
subpoena rights and to have the
assistance of counsel for your defense
or you can stand as your own counsel
and I know they tell you that it's a
fool that stands as his own Council but
it's my argument that it's a fool that
doesn't
because I'll tell you why you know your
case better than you better than anybody
how many times do you hear about gripes
between attorneys and the citizens the
biggest gripe they have is well he never
said nothing about that or she never
said nothing about that well she didn't
do this or she didn't do that well why
because they don't know the case as good
as you do you're the one that knows your
best case the only thing they know is
how to apply the law so all I'm telling
you is learn how to apply the law in
your constitutional rights and then you
don't need to do that
the only time you get into trouble is if
you run your mouth too much and you get
into self-incrimination so obviously you
have to keep your wits about you and
watch your mouth
but the bottom line is actually I
personally believe you're the best
person
to present the facts of your case
because you're the best person that
knows all the facts the only thing you
do not know how to do is how to actually
do it in a legal and lawful manner that
is recognized by the legal community and
that's really not hard to learn I can
teach you believe me
all right the Seventh Amendment
in suits at the common law where the
value and controversy show exceed twenty
dollars or write a trial by Jerry shall
be preserved and no fact Tried by a jury
shall be otherwise re-examined in any
Court of the United States because the
jury is the ultimate trainer effect
then according to the rules of the
common law
now we'll get into that common law
argument there's a lot of heavy
arguments around that common law
basically I don't want to overwhelm you
on the first time out of the shoot
because that's not hard to do okay
now the bottom line of this constitution
is it's all in writing
it clearly represents a contract
I'm asking you to learn your contract
I'm asking you to learn the book
learn your contract I mean when you go
to some place to do some work on your
car you read the document that comes
with it for the warranty don't you why
because just in case something goes
wrong you want to be able to bring it
back right
well I'm asking you to read the warranty
on your Constitution so that you can
understand the rights that you have
under that Constitution
so that if you don't get it right we can
bring it back does that make sense to
you all right now it's also important
that you understand
that this constitution is a very unique
document
and that this constitution is supposed
to be enforced and I'm going to teach
you some things here right now this
right here is a representation I know
it's kind of hard to see here but
basically what we're talking about here
is this comes from the books that tell
the judge how
right here and over here this comes and
tells the judge how the Constitution is
to be interpreted this is from the
amgurus Prudence volumes and this is
volume 16.
you want the Constitutional law section
right here
constitutional law and you want section
97.
and when you start reading it the most
important part about it and I'll read it
is that a constitution should really
should receive a liberal interpretation
in favor of the citizen is especially
true with respect to those Provisions
which were designed to safeguard the
liberty and security of the citizen in
regard to both person and property can
you see that can you all see that is
that coming out right here over more
okay all right
to safeguard the liberty and security of
the citizen in regard to both person and
property C note 31 rise versus United
States 273 us-28 and all of these 40
Supreme Court cases hold that accent
in other words it's supposed to be
liberally enforced in favor of the
citizen for the protection rights and
property and a constitutional provision
intended to confer a benefit should be
liberally construed in favor of the
clearly intended and expressly
designated beneficiary 32 but on 32 de
Jammer versus Hospital authority of
Albany in all of these cases let's do
that over again in a constitutional
provision intended to confer a benefit
should be liberally construed in favor
of the clearly intended and expressly
designated beneficiary similarly a
provision intended to afford a remedy to
those who have just claims should
receive a beneficial construction for
the purpose of extending the remedy to
all
who might barely come within the meaning
of the terms
and that's writer versus fitchie of Ohio
a Supreme Court case okay
that's note number 33 okay
now this comes out of 16 dangerous
Prudence in other words I have this
constitution
this constitution is a contract in
writing enforceable in the court of law
pursuant to the statute of frauds I'm
asking for specific performance your
honor in favor of me I am the
beneficiary of the contract
there's also a basic premise in contract
law basic contract law 101 of any first
year law student that says the contract
shall be enforced most favorably in
favor of the non-preparer
and that's you you didn't prepare it
now if you believe honestly that you
have a right and you can timely bring
that right before a proper adjudicated
Authority and you can clearly stipulate
as to what your rate was guess what they
got us to listen that's the way it is
that's the way it's supposed to be
and I'm telling you if you know your
rights and your timely circles rights
you have those rights but if you sit on
your haunches and you cry foul
that's terrible somebody ought to do
something about that hey be a somebody
do something about it don't sit there
telling me as somebody ought to do
something about that be a somebody you
do something about it you honestly got
an honest you go out there and you
take care of it
because that's what it takes to be an
American that's what I'll that's what
it's all about that's what being an
American is all about that's what
separates you from the rest of the whole
world
because Americans you don't trample on
their rights because they're going to
come get you
you do not trample on their rights they
won't put up with it so be an American
and don't put up with it stand up there
and be counted now I want to read the
next argument there which is argument
numbers 98
which basically deals with the effect of
an emergency while an emergency cannot
create power and no emergency justifies
the violation of any of the provisions
of the United States Constitution or
state constitutions public emergencies
such as economic depression
for especially liberal construction of
Constitutional Powers and it has been
declared that because of national
exigency it is the policy of the courts
in times of national Peril so liberally
to construe the special powers vested in
the chief executive as to sustain and
effectuate the purpose thereof and to
that end also more liberally to construe
the constituted Division and
classification of the powers of the
co-ordinate branches of the government
and insofar as may not be clearly
inconsistent
with the Constitution right in other
words they can't be in conflict with the
Constitution to vest extraordinary
powers in the chief executive and I'm
telling you on the other hand a
contention that a grave emergency such
as the depression should permit
construction of the Constitutional
Provisions which would meet the
emergency was rejected in one case the
court holding that neither the
legislature nor any executive or
judicial officer may disregard the
provisions of the constitution in cases
of an emergency
where the plain and unequivocable terms
of the Constitution present to question
of construction as to departures in
emergencies so not even an emergency
justifies the taken away of
constitutional provisions and I know
you've heard differently I know you
think well they got an emergency they
just declare an emergency and then the
president issues an executive order but
let me ask you if it's a republican
Constitution of the United States is it
the law no
who says so we do we're the people it's
our country it's our constitution we're
the ones that say you can't do that and
we mean it we've been a little better
listen
all right now
let's get into the next argument here
now I hope I'm not boring you to tears
here but it's kind of important that we
cover these basic things so that you can
understand
as to the construction ref with
reference to the common law an important
Canon of construction is that that
constitutions must be construed with
reference to the common law
that means the law of the little people
out there not the corporations
okay
since in most respects the federal and
state constitutions did not repudiate
but cherish the established common law
this fact has been taken into
consideration by the courts and
construing certain Clauses in a state
constitution such as the provision
securing their right to a jury trial
also Provisions in regard to crimes have
been interpreted with reference to the
common law rule that one
that one charge with a crime may be
convicted of a lesser offense
necessarily included in the crime charge
in such cases the courts of the state
always regard the language in the common
law sense so the common law prevails
don't let anybody tell you this
admiralty law prevails because it only
prevails of you to get sucked into it
we're not going to let you do that we're
going to teach you how to beat it
the common law also permitted
destruction of the abatement of
nuisances by summary proceedings traffic
tickets folks
that's what a traffic ticket does
it is a writ of assistance a bill of
attainder it's unlawful in the United
States of America
and it was never supposed that a
constitutional provision was intended to
interfere with this established
principle and although there is no
common law of the United States in the
sense who said so Erie Railroad versus
Tompkins okay
all right of a
National customary law as distinguished
from the common law of England adopted
into several States in interpreting the
Federal Constitution
recourse may still be had to the aid of
the common law of England
it has been said that without reference
to this common law the language of the
Federal Constitution could not be
understood
so the common law applies folks and
we're going to get into that common law
heavily in the advanced section all
right
okay now let's get back into this in
interpreting the Federal Constitution
adopted by the several States all right
the recourse may still be had to the aid
of the common law of England it has been
said that without reference to the
common law the language of the United
States Constitution would not be
understood this is due to the fact that
this instrument and the plan of
government of the United States were
founded on the common law as established
in England at the time of the Revolution
okay therefore it is the general rule
that the phrases in the Bill of Rights
taken from the common law must be
construed in reference to the latter
specifically the United States Supreme
Court has taken the common law into
consideration in construing the Fourth
Amendment the Fifth Amendment Provisions
relating all right so the common law is
extremely important that we get in and
we will cover that thoroughly it's
important to understand that most of you
out there aren't citizens at the common
law
that only only those that understand the
differences in admiralty and maritime
law those that are corporations officers
of Corporations or officers of
government residing in the District of
Columbia the 14th Amendment duality of
citizenship which is talked about in the
case of Erie Railroad versus Tompkins
which is a rather heavy argument and I
will cover that thoroughly with you so
that you understand where the traps and
the differences are but for right now
I'm trying to demonstrate to you
construction and programming so that you
can understand that this constitution
right here is the supreme law of the
land it is a contract in writing it is
enforceable in favor of you in an open
court of law you are the beneficiary
okay I want to give you some basic more
points on the Sam jurisprudence argument
this is section 114 of the 16th volume
of amjurisput in a second I'm going to
give you a couple more of these sites so
that you can understand how powerful a
document this is okay by the way I
highly recommend you go down to the law
library
grab that 16 volume amjurispruden start
at section one and start paging through
to section 300 you will absolutely be
astounded
we are now in 16th amgurus Prudence
second section 117.
and I will read it to you basically
various facts and circumstances
extrinsic to the Constitution are often
resorted to by the courts to Aid them in
determining its meaning as previously
noted however such extrinsic AIDS may
not be resorted to where the provision
in the question is clear and unambiguous
in such a case the courts must apply the
terms of the Constitution as written
and they are not at Liberty to search
for meanings beyond the instrument
which that militia argument and that
Collective law theory of the Second
Amendment is they're reaching they're
reaching far
all right
clearly it says in the plain English the
right of the people to keep in carry
arms shall not be infringed now what is
it you don't understand about the word
infringed
they're infringen the Brady Bill it's
infringement 1968 gun control act it's
infringent all of these uh the CCW acts
of these States they're infringent who
says so you do
how shall a document be enforced in
favor of who you
when are you going to enforce it
you're the one that is the the citizen
all power is inherent in the people
you're the one with the power and force
your power all right
does everybody understand that argument
that's the magnificence I'm bringing the
genie out we're stroking the bottle here
and I'm going to bring the genie out
here in a second you're going to
understand the magnificence of the power
of this book
you see once you understand this is an
ironclad contract once you understand
that this is enforceable in the court of
law pursuant to the statute of frauds
once you understand you have a right to
claim specific performance on the
contract your honor I'm demand and my
right to keep and carry arms and they're
right shall not be infringed I want
specific performance I am the holder of
the contract it's supposed to be
enforced in favor of me I am the query
intended any special designated
beneficiary decision I want the thing
protected in favor of my right
does that make logical sense to you now
do you start to understand the power of
this document okay see before you just
thought it was a bunch of riding in some
in some textbook that you had to take
when you took a serious class in high
school in the 11th grade
see I want you to understand that you
don't leave home without this this is
more important than your credit card
okay
next let's get into the next section I'm
going to cover some more of these
amgurus Prudence sections so that you
can understand
I want to get into uh section 155.
16th amateurs Prudence second section
155. since the Constitution is intended
for the observance of the Judiciary as
well as other Departments of government
and the judges are sworn to prove to
support its Provisions guide me sworn
has an oval of a sworn
the courts are not at Liberty to
overlook or disregard
its commands or countenance evasions
thereof it is their Duty in authorized
proceedings to give full effect to the
existing Constitution and to obey all
constitutional Provisions irrespective
of their opinion as to the wisdom or the
desirability of such provisions and
irrespective of the consequences thus it
is said that the courts should be in our
alert to enforce the provisions of the
United States Constitution and guard
against their infringement
my legislative Fiat or otherwise in
accordance with these basic principles
the rule is fixed that the duty in the
proper case to declare a law and
constitutional cannot be declined
and must be performed in accordance with
the deliberate Judgment of the tribunal
before which the validity of the
enactment is directly drawn into
question if the Constitution prescribes
one rule and the statute another and a
different rule it is the duty of the
courts to declare that the Constitution
and not the statute governs in cases
before them for judgment
does everybody understand that
he's they're telling the judge you got a
rule in favor of the Constitution
if you know your Constitution
whose favor are they going to rule in
yours but you have to have enough hair
in your tail feather to walk in there
and say hey I'm an American
and I have a constitutional right that
right shall not be infringed and you're
infringing and I'm asking you not to do
that because it's not nice
and I'm asking the judge to do his duty
under a sworn off of office and uphold
the United States Constitution as he
swore he would under article 11
paragraph one in this state which says
the that he shall Swear to protect and
defend the Constitution from all enemies
foreign and domestic and heal
performance duties to the best of his
ability so help him God no let's get
closer to so help him God
now let's get into another one of these
we've got a load of them folks so let's
bear with me here
16th amgurus Prudence second section
177.
declaratory judgments
declaratory judgment actions have often
been utilized to test the
constitutionality of a statute in
government practices the uniform
declaratory judgments act makes specific
provisions of the determination of
construction or validity of statutes in
Municipal ordinance by declaratory
judgment and is considered to furnish a
particularly appropriate method for the
determination of controversies relative
to the construction and validity of the
statutes
and of ordinances the federal
declaratory judgment act although it
does not mention the Declarations as to
the construction or validity of the
statutes has been invoked frequently as
a means of a saying the
constitutionality of congressional
legislation a plaintiff can have a
declaratory judgment action on the
constitutionality of either the federal
or state statute by a single federal
judge
so long as he does not ask to have the
operation of the statute and joined you
can enjoin a constitutional right
a court May Grant declaratory relief
unless there is a case of controversy
before the court that is the dispute
must consist of specific adverse claims
based upon present rather than future or
speculative effects on which to base the
adjudication all right I'm trying to
tell you folks here you have a right to
demand a declaratory judgment which we
are going to do in several of our cases
here
and they got to declare is it
constitutional or isn't it
constitutional if it's constitutional it
has to be judged in favor of who you the
citizen why because you're the
beneficiary it's supposed to be enforced
and Fay review the beneficiary the
citizen for the protection rights and
property seabriers versus United States
273 U.S 28. and the 40 Supreme Court
cases that support that mandate okay
now let's get there's just a couple more
here bear with me I know you're probably
bored to tears right now but I don't
want you to do that I want you to pay
attention
okay we're at section 255.
16th amateurs Prudence section 255. in
all instances where the court exercises
its power to invalidate legislation on
constitutional grounds the conflict of
the statute with the Constitution must
be irreconcilable
the Brady Bill
irreconcilable huh in other words the
court is without authority to declare a
statute unconstitutional unless it is in
positive or direct conflict with the
statute
or with the Constitution
thus a statute is not to be declared
unconstitutional unless so inconsistent
with the Constitution it cannot be
enforced without a violation thereof
because that would be violating the
Constitution we can't have that what
happened in Marbury versus Madison 5DS
137 same thing
a clear incompatibility between law and
the Constitution must exist before the
Judiciary is Justified in holding the
law unconstitutional this principle is
of course in line with the rule that
doubts as to constitutionality should be
resolved in favor of the
constitutionality
and the beneficiary you the citizen for
the protection your rights and property
okay does everybody pick up on that now
let's let's shift to 256
256 right here
the general rule is that an
unconstitutional statute whether federal
or state though having the form and name
of law is in reality no law but is Holy
void
and ineffective for any purpose since
unconstitutionality
dates from the time of the enactment and
not merely from the date of the decision
so branding it
wouldn't it be interesting if 34 34
where's 34
there's 35 or right here's 34. State X
row versus nuyen V Greer but I'll tell
you what Marbury versus Madison comes
higher than that okay
all right 34. let's cover that again and
ineffective for any purpose since the
unconstitutionality dates from the time
of the enactment and not merely from the
date of the decision so branding it an
unconstitutional law in legal
contemplation is as inoperative as if it
never had been passed the Brady Bill the
crime bill
the 1968 gun control Bill all these
bills
such a statute leaves the question that
it purports to settle just as it would
be had the statute not ever been enacted
no repeal of an enactment is necessary
since an unconstitutional law is void
the general principles follows that it
imposes no duties confers no rights
creates no office bestows no Power
Authority on anyone affords no
protection and justifies no acts
performed under it a contract
did everybody pick up on that keyword
contract a contract which rests on an
unconstitutional statute creates
no obligation to be impaired by
subsequent legislation no one is bound
to obey an unconstitutional law no
courts are bound to enforce it persons
convicted and fined under a statute
subsequently Helen constitutional May
recover the fines paid a void act cannot
be legally inconsistent with a valid one
and an unconstitutional law cannot
operate to supersede an existing valid
law indeed insofar as a statute runs
counter to the fundamental law of the
land the Constitution it is superseded
thereby since an unconstitutional
statute cannot repeal or in any way
affect an existing one if a repealing
statute is unconstitutional the statute
which it attempts to repeal remains in
full force in effect and where a clue
well what did I say there I mean remains
in full force in effect is the Second
Amendment of Full Force in effect you
better believe it okay
now what is it they don't understand
about in Fringe and where statute which
it attempts to repeal remains in a full
force in effect and where a clause
repealing a prayer law is inserted in
the ACT which act is unconstitutional
avoid the provision of the repeal of the
prior law will usually fall with it and
will not be permitted to operate as
repealing such prior law in other words
the law stands always the real law the
Constitution the general principle
stated above apply to the Constitutions
as well as to the laws of several States
and so far as they are repugnant to the
Constitution and the laws of the United
States and let's see if 54 will confer
kyun versus Barry but I can tell you
Marbury versus Madison is higher than
that but I'd be willing to better lay
sighted Marbury in that moreover a
constitution of a statute
a construction of a statute which brings
in conflict with a constitution will
nullify it as effectively as if it added
in its expressed term has been enacted
in Conflict there with so
anything passed in conflict with the
United States Constitution is clearly
unconstitutional it doesn't take a
college professor graduating Magnum
loudly from Harvard to figure these
things out all you have to do is read
that's why God gave you eyes now
the actual existence well let's go to
257 257 same book 16 hamburgers prudence
the actual existence of a statute
priority determination that it is
unconstitutional is and in as is an
operative fact
and may have consequences which cannot
justify
being ignored when a statute which has
been in effect for some time is declared
unconstitutional questions of Rights
claim to have become vested
of status
of Prior determinations deemed to have
finality and acted upon accordingly of
priority terminations deemed to have
finale enacted upon accordingly and of
public policy in the light of the nature
both of the statute and of its previous
application demand examination
all right it has been said that
in all-inclusive statement of the
principle of absolute retroactive
invalidity cannot be justified obviously
it would be exposed facto an
unconstitutional statute is not
necessarily a novelty it may have
indeterminate consequences binding upon
the people all right
so you have to pay attention to what's
going on
now let's get a few more and we're out
of here
section 258 I'm just going to read the
important section here on the other hand
it is clear that Congress cannot buy
authorization or ratification give the
slightest effect to a state law or
Constitution which is in conflict with
the Constitution of the United States it
would be what a nullity why because it's
in conflict of repugnancy it'd be in
violation of Marbury versus Madison all
right so are you starting to see the
gist of what's going on here there's
just one more I think and we're out of
here
all right section 260 of the same 16th
am jurisprudence now folks head down to
the law library the books are usually
Greener red in color they're kind of
thick
ask the librarian where amgurus Prudence
second is stored go on over there grab
the 16 volume start at section one and
just start paging through to say at
section 300. I'm telling you you won't
believe it
we're going to look at section 260.
although it is Manifest that an
unconstitutional provision in the
statute is not cured because included in
the same act with valid provisions and
that there are no degrees of
constitutionality in other words it's
either constitutional or it's
unconstitutional there's nothing like
it's kind of like half pregnant there's
no such thing right
so that an act is either constitutional
or it is unconstitutional okay so if you
got statute here and most of it's
constitutional and a part of its
unconstitutional guess what it's all
unconstitutional
so what we got here is a crime bill and
we got part of it as constitutional and
part of it's unconstitutional obviously
they had no Authority Under the Second
Amendment to fool around with the right
of the people to keep in their arms they
couldn't demand that the people not
possess certain firearms
so this directly applies to this crime
bill
obviously part of the bill is
constitutional and the other part is not
constitutional so what is the end result
the whole bill is unconstitutional does
everybody see that now I want you to
start looking at these things and I want
you to start hammering these guys and
don't let these guys pull this kind of
stuff hook them
over there in column say uh
hey Charlie let's step over here for a
minute I want to check out something
here
I mean you would if they had your wallet
wouldn't you that make sense to you now
we're going to get into a new unique
argument here
for the last half hour I've been trying
to hammer home the power of this book
this book right here okay
I'm trying to hammer home the power of
this book to teach you that
this is the most valuable book in your
whole life
if you know what's in this book I am
telling you
you are in full possession of your
American citizenship if you don't know
what's in this book
I'm telling you
you're going to be a slave subject to
the whim of extrajudicial people who
want to tell you what to do when to do
it how to do it and how how to pack it
now my anus philosophy to you is as a
kindness and a Christian to you I tell
you learn this book I love it when these
guys tell me I don't have any rights
I said well if you believe that let's go
to court
and on the end of the day we'll see who
owns who
but I'm going to tell you right now if
you violate any of my constitutional
rights
I will sue your socks off and I will
attach everything you own Bank business
and home
and I'm telling you I'm the one your
mama warned you about so you're damn all
better listen
do not violate my rights because I will
come after you and I will take care of
business and I will do what is necessary
and proper and I will pull every stop
out and I will go dig up every nut bolt
screw and when it's done you will find
out you mess with the wrong American
because this American is not going to
back down okay now we're going to get
into a real special argument now this
argument has taken almost 18 and a half
years to develop so I want you to pay
attention this argument is a unique
concept that has been honed like a razor
to a very meticulous Edge so that you
can understand what's going on obviously
we have established clearly that you
have a constitutional right and
obviously we have established that you
are the beneficiary of the contract and
we have established that the
constitution is a contract in writing
enforceable in the court of law and we
have established that you have a right
to claim specific performance on the
contract
and we have established that it's
supposed to be interpreted in your favor
so if you've got an honest
constitutional belief they have to
listen now let's take that to the next
step
the next step is can a state arbitrary
and erroneously convert your right into
a privilege and issue a license and a
fee for it let's start start with here
we're going to start walking down his
sheet okay
Murdoch versus Pennsylvania U.S Supreme
Court
now when you want to go into the law
library and you want to look up
something
what you want to do is understand that
Supreme Court is Trump okay that's the
clearest way I can explain it to you
if you've got a Supreme Court case that
trumps a a district court at Trump's a
court of appeals at Trump's estate court
that trumps everything so you want to
deal with Supreme Court cases as best
you can
Murdoch versus Pennsylvania is a unique
case it's recorded at 319 U.S 105.
that's the 319th volume of United States
Supreme Court reports
on page 105. so when you go to the law
library go into U.S reports ask the
little Gallery the little guy that's
behind the counter where is the United
States Supreme Court reports they'll
tell you right where it is you grab
volume 319 you turn to page 105 and
it'll give you the case of Murdoch
versus Pennsylvania
Murdock versus Pennsylvania is a real
unique case
and I'm I'm telling you to read the case
you get the case the judge always likes
to see that you're ready
and I'm going to submit basically the
case briefly basically it is a religious
test case wherein Jehovah's Witness in
the in the year of 1943 wanted their
right to be able to go and preach among
the public because that is their right
to evangelize okay
Pennsylvania in Pennsylvania
they wanted them to have a license to
solicit okay this is basically the
crooks of the case
now what happened was uh this the
Jehovah's Witness claimed their First
Amendment right of life liberty and
pursuit of happiness the right to
worship and and exercise their religion
unencumbered right
and of course that's one of the
Mainstays that founded this country was
the religious freedom okay and basically
the points on the case that are
established our estate may not impose a
charge for the enjoyment of a right
granted by the Federal Constitution
and that a flat license tax here
involved restrains in advance the
Constitutional Liberties of press and
religion and inevitably tends to
suppress their existence all right let's
pull that over there everybody see that
okay
all right I'll start again a state may
not impose a charge for the re enjoyment
of a right granted by the Federal
Constitution
and that a flat license tax here
involved restrains in advance the
Constitutional Liberties of the press
and religion and inevitably tends to
suppress the exercise thereof that the
ordinance is non-discriminatory and that
it applies also to Peddlers of Wares and
merchandises and material the Liberty is
granted by the First Amendment are and
in a preferred position since the
privilege in question is guaranteed by
the Federal Constitution and exists
independently of the state's Authority
the inquiry as to whether the state has
given something for which it cannot ask
a return is irrelevant
all right no state may convert a secured
Liberty into a privilege and issue a
license and a fee for it now a lot of
people come back to me and say well I'm
not a Jehovah's Witness so that case
doesn't apply to me I want you to reach
I want you to understand we're not
talking about whether you're a Jehovah's
Witness here what we're talking about
here is are you an American and do you
have rights
what they are talking about here is that
these Jehovah's Witness people exercise
their rights timely that they had a
right to worship and exercise and and
worship their God and evangelize as they
chose and that the state came in and
arbitrarily converted that right into a
privilege and issued a license and a fee
for it that is totally unconstitutional
now we took that case as a pioneering
case
and we argue that case for all of your
constitutional rights
all you need to do is keep in mind that
you are an American and you have
constitutional rights number one number
two you have to keep in mind what right
can you pull the right out of the
Constitution
if you can pull the right out of the
Constitution and I'll give you an
example how about the right to travel
freely and encumbent pursuant to share
resistance Thompson and we'll get into
that about the right to keep in bear
arms right does the state have a right
to require a license and a fee for the
exercise of the right and if they do can
you ignore the license in the fee we'll
get into that now obviously in this case
it's clearly established and this is the
premise of this case
no state may convert a secured Liberty
into a privilege issue a license and a
fee for it
and require you to have that
otherwise you committed a crime that's
totally 100 percent unconstitutional I
want that to get across real clear now
let's jump to the next Case by the way
Murdoch is recorded at 319 that's the
319 volume
U.S reports page 105 will start the case
all right go read the case though make
sure you read the case I don't want
anybody to come up and tell me they
didn't read the case because I'm gonna
get on you you're not following that's
failure to follow instructions
okay now we're gonna walk down the next
step of this case we we took care of
Murdoch here let's go to Shuttlesworth
versus Birmingham Alabama which is
recorded at volume 373. the same U.S
reports you go to volume 373 turn to
page 262. when we go to Shuttlesworth
versus Birmingham Alabama
this is another unique religious case
okay
in this case six ministers were accused
of inciting to Riot and otherwise create
a disturbance and disturb the peace okay
and they had a sit down this case came
down in 1962.
and what happened was they said they
needed to have a license to
to have a public uh
Gathering okay
and what happened was it went to the
Supreme Court Supreme Court says no no
you don't need to have a license for the
exercise of a First Amendment right to
freely Assemble
okay
right basically the gist of the case is
uh
the Negro ministers were convicted in
Alabama State Court of aiding and
abetting and violation of Criminal
Trespass ordinance in Birmingham Alabama
the only evidence against them was to
the effect that they had incited 10
negro students to engage in a sit-down
demonstration in a white Lunch Counter
actually there were six ministers but
only two got charged as a protest
against the racial segregation
and they cite other cases a lot of times
you can find other cases in these cases
and Goldberg versus city of Birmingham
Alabama this court today holds on the
authority of Peterson versus City of
Greenville
that the convictions of those 10
students for Criminal Trespass were
constitutionally invalid since those
convictions have been set aside it
follows that these petitioners did not
incite or Aid and abet any crime and
that therefore the convictions of these
petitioners must be set aside now
basically what they were claiming is
their constitutional right to freely
unassemble the cities was claiming that
they had to have a license to put on a
demonstration which they didn't have and
they were charging them with a Criminal
Trespass for not having a valid license
to freely assemble and or
protest okay
now the gist of this case
I want you to see the significance of
this case in view of the second the next
the case we gave you before that Murdoch
versus Pennsylvania clearly established
that no state could convert a secured
Liberty and a privileged initial license
and a fee for it because everybody got
that Shuttlesworth versus Birmingham
Alabama said that if the state does
convert your right into a privilege and
issue a license and a fee for it you can
ignore the license and if you engage in
the right with impunity that means they
can't punish you they got to let you go
all right does everybody see that it's
very important that you understand first
your Constitution is a supreme law of
land that means you have that right and
that that right shall not be in French
and it's supposed to be enforced in
favor of you the query intended and
expressly designated beneficiary it's
very important that you understand that
no state may convert that right into a
privilege an issue a license and a fee
for it and if they do Shuttlesworth
versus Birmingham Alabama says you can
ignore the license and engage in the
right with impunity that means they
can't punish you
now the next case is very important and
it's very important that you see the
argument
okay
that's United States versus Bishop
that's 412. I am 412 United States
reports this is Page 346.
come down here
[Applause]
United States versus Bishop is a very
unique case
basically what Bishop does is it sets a
standard for what constitutes a criminal
violation in terms of willful intent
okay
willfulness is is one of the major
elements that is required to be proven
in any criminal element you have to
prove one that you're the party two that
you had a method or an opportunity to do
the thing and third that you did so with
a willful intent now when we get to
willful intent willful is defined as an
evil motive or intent to avoid a known
Duty or task under the law with a moral
certainty
obviously in the previous two cases you
have decided that you have relied on the
United States Constitution
and you have relied on decisions of the
United States Supreme Court
so could you have willfully done any
deed or crime obviously not so guess
what this case stipulates that you have
a perfect defense to the element of
willfulness all right since the burden
on the prosecution is to prove that you
did willfully annoyingly avoid a known
Duty or task under the law while moral
certainty he cannot perform that task
any because it's obviously you have a
constitutional immunity to that
the previous case Shadows were first
Birmingham Alabama so they couldn't even
punish it
the case before that said you didn't
need a license for the exercise of a
right and the case before that said your
constitutional right is supreme over any
state law so if they pass the law in
violation of your Constitution the
Constitution overwhelms a state law so
the law doesn't even exist a lot does
everybody see that now since the
prosecutor does not have a cause of
action for which Elite can be granted
your enemy and please the court
council is specifically precluded from
performing his major task Therefore your
honor may have pleased the court at this
time I would motion most graciously for
a dismissal with prejudice for failure
to State a cause of action for which
relief may be granted by this honorable
court and I'd kind of like to collect my
costs and fees for having to defend this
badly frivolous and spurious complaint
sir may it please the court
laughter will usually break out
thereafter at which point the judge will
usually turn to the prosecutor and say
Well Mr pearls what do you think we
ought to do about this young fella
and he'll say I'd go for the motion to
dismiss your honor and the judge will
turn to him and say that's a good answer
because I don't think you're ready for
this kid today
and 40 attorneys will break out laughing
okay that's actually happened to me
folks
I'm telling you this argument is a
killer argument it's good for every
single constitutional right you've got
all you have to do is fill in the blanks
what constitutional right prove that you
have the constitutional right tell them
the state doesn't have a right to
convert that right into a privilege tell
them that they can't even punish you if
they do and then claim that the
prosecutor can't improve willfulness so
you obviously didn't do no crime and
then flip around and demand for your
dismissal which is your right and get
your costs and fees for having to defend
this frivolous case may I please the
court and I promise you you will be
amazed 40 attorneys will jump up and say
yeah
they'll come up and shake your hand and
tell you that's one of the most
magnificent arguments they've ever heard
they'll tell you you got something like
King Kong for taking on the bar
association or whatever
now I'm telling you these things that
personally happen to me I can relate the
exact cases that goes for practice and
law without a license obviously you got
a right to work you got a right to
contract your your right to work
as you see fit now to some arbitrary
Caprice Inspire Association sees fit
right does that make sense to you
you don't want to belong to the union
that's your right this is a this is a
right to work state right
the bottom line is this they cannot
compel you to have a license or pay a
fee for the exercise of your right
and if they do you can ignore the
license and if you engage in the right
with impunity that means they can't
punish him since you got a perfect
defense to the element of willfulness
they cannot
punish you
they have to dismiss they do not have a
cause of action now this argument I'm
telling you is taking us over 18 years
to develop in the courts and in law
libraries over the years and just kind
of compiling and arguing cases and doing
this this argument is a killer argument
there have yet have they ever won
against us on this argument uh nor could
they in the United States of America as
long as the Constitution stands
I'm asking if you pay attention to this
argument and start utilizing it we'll
show you some of the techniques later in
the second half all right now the word
willfully has the same meaning all right
in controlling the voluntary intentional
violation of a known legal Duty
and the distinction between the statute
is found in the additional misconduct
that is essential to the violation of
the felony provision if they can't prove
willfulness they can't prove NADA okay
because everybody got that
now let's go to the next one
now that you've won and your rights have
been violated
the next thing they will claim while we
acting in good faith for what we acting
in good faith we had good faith Reliance
that you broke the law
okay
and that means you can't sue us
that's a lie
you see since these two cases Owen
versus City of Independence which is
recorded at 100 volume and you want to
look at Supreme Court reports now that's
a different reporter
Supreme Court reports will actually say
on the back of the reporters Supreme
Court reports it won't say U.S it'll say
Supreme Court report so so that's a
different volume it's a newer a newer
reporter so you want the 100th volume
and you want to look up Supreme Court
reports and you want to turn to page
1398.
there is a a also a counterpart case to
This Owen case which is remember which
is uh Maine versus Thibodeaux
I'll give you the site for those
okay I gave your own receive any
pennants so I'll give you mean versus
Thibodeau main versus Thibodeaux is
recorded at 100 Supreme Court that's
100th volume Supreme Court reports
page 2502
now basically the summation of what
these what what these basic arguments
say where plain language of a statute
supported by consistent judicial
interpretation is strong it is not
necessary to look beyond the words of
the statute right
now
what these are both civil rights cases
the right of action created by Statute
relating to deprivation under color of
law of state law of a right secured by
the Constitution and the laws of the
United States encompasses claims which
are based solely on statutory violations
of federal law and apply to the claim
that claimants had been deprived of
their rights in some capacity to which
they were entitled now whenever this
happens folks you must understand
something
and that goes for both Maine versus
Thibodeaux and Owen versus Independence
and I'll tell you the brief synopsis on
both these cases Owen was a police chief
in a town of Independence Missouri and
he got in a gripe with the city council
in the indiscriminately fired him
without just cause
Owen turned around in sued
they claim that they acted in good faith
the Supreme Court said sir you are
deemed to be officers of the law you are
to advise us to the law you can hardly
claim that you act in good faith for a
willful deprivation of the law and you
certainly can't claim ignorance of the
law cause a citizen out here in a street
can't claim ignorance of the loan it
makes the law look stupid if an officer
of the quarters some officer of
government doesn't know the law and then
they go ahead and abuse somebody's
Constitution right so in matters of
constitutional rights both these cases
uphold one point and the point they
uphold is that whenever they violate
your constitutional rights they do so at
their own Peril and it even says that in
Title 18 United States code section 241
and 242 it says that upon conviction you
are subject to a ten thousand dollar
fine 10 years in jail or both and if
death results life in prison they're
telling you don't violate somebody's
rights please don't do that title 42
United States code sections 1983 1985
and 1986 query established your right to
sue anybody that does that
now they're going to claim you can't sue
them because they have judicial immunity
well guess what these two cases remove
judicial immunity there is no judicial
immunity for violating somebody's
constitutional rights judge you are
deemed to know the law and sworn to
uphold it you can hardly claim that you
act in good faith for willful
deprivation of the law and you certainly
can't plead ignorance of the law for
that and make the law look stupid for a
knowledgeable judge to claim ignorance
of the law when a citizen on a street
can't claim ignorance of the law
therefore there is no judicial immunity
I want to get that across I don't know
how many attorneys come up to me all the
time tell me well they're immune
because they acted in good faith
they're just not reading their Court
they're not reading their Court reports
because if they're reading their Court
reports they would have known this case
has been on the book since 1982. both
both these cases came down in 1982. so I
want you to pay attention to these cases
when somebody tells you they can violate
your rights with with impunity you just
kind of smile and say make my day
okay
now the next case we want to talk about
is Briars versus United States we
mentioned it previously earlier
Breyers is recorded at 273 volume 273
U.S reports page 28 okay now
Brian's races United States is in a
unique case it's a search and seizure
case but basically it sets
constitutional standards which we had
talked about in the amgurus Prudence
sections
in the amgurus Prudence sections okay I
especially want to pay attention to note
number three here
constitutional Provisions for the
security of a person in property are to
be liberally construed and it is the
duty of the courts To Be watchful for
the constitutional rights of the citizen
and against any stealthy encroachment
they're in all right when a Federal
Officer participates officially with the
state official in a search so that in
substance and effect it is their joint
operation the legality of the search and
the use and evidence of the things
seized is to be tested in federal
prosecutions as it would be if the
undertaking were exclusively the federal
agent all right
the reality here is what they are
setting is the standards must be
liberally construed in favor of the
citizen it's the duty of the court to
make sure that happens so now
you have a right to be wrong you have a
right to uh enter your viable defenses
that you honestly think no State can
convert that right into a privilege
initial license and a fee if they do you
can ignore the license in the fee they
have must per they must prove the burden
of proof of willfulness which they
cannot do
if they do violate your rights you do
have a right to sue them and Owens
versus City of Independence Maine versus
libido they have to give every
consideration to you all right and
that's the way it is 1900 yesterday all
right the next case we want to talk
about is boy Boyd versus United States
116 U.S page 616. the court is to
protect against encroachment of
constitutionality or secure Liberty all
right now
it is equivalent to a compulsory
production of papers to make the
non-production of them a confession of
the allegations which is is pretended
they will prove and a lot of times that
happens in federal cases they'll claim
something they won't prove it this
happened to me believe me and then the
fact that they've claimed it makes it
true
and then of course you have to prove a
negative which is impossible
all right now the seizure compulsory
production of a man's private papers to
be used in evidence against him is
equivalent to compelling him to be a
witness against himself in violation of
Fifth Amendment and in a prosecution for
a crime penalty or forfeiture is equally
within the prohibition of the Fifth
Amendment see that now
the bottom line here is
Lloyd protects against encroachment of
constitutionally secured Liberties let's
arguing the Fifth Amendment here but
it's basically arguing against
encroachment right so that's when you
want to pay attention to when you're
coming especially to things on search
and seizure Natures another good case
that you should know is your Miranda
versus Arizona and folks I'm going to
tell you something
and even I can learn something not that
I'm not much above you I want to come to
you humbly in humility I'm I'm telling
you I've read and I know and there's a
lot of things about the law and I've
been my own attorney for over 25 years
and I kick the tail out of them I'll be
honest with you but I always can learn
something and I'm not stupid enough ever
not to realize that the next thing I'm
going to tell you is probably one of the
most important things we're going to
tell you today
this is the Miranda versus Arizona
decision
it's recorded at 384 volume 384 us
that's U.S reports page 436. now this is
a heavy duty case
every American should know this case
backward and forward upside down another
all right
Miranda versus Arizona
this is the one that says you got to
write your main sound you got to write
to an attorney you got it right to have
your attorney president requesting
anything you say you can will be held
against you in a court of law if you
can't afford an attorney want to be
appointed for you by the court you wish
to make any statement on your behalf and
you understand the rights that I have
spoken to you
as soon as they stop you talk to you as
soon as they start talking to you they
are required to say that if they don't
say that they screwed up
if they hire you into jail and they
don't tell you this read it to you and
then they want to make you sign a little
uh statement and you know your rights
and you knowingly waive them please
folks don't sign that statement
use your head for some mother in a hat
rack
do not sign that statement ever you are
annoyingly waving your constitutional
rights don't ever do that
I mean they don't make they don't make
it
that hard
as soon as you hear those people start
talking it you tell them right
effectively I want to talk to an
attorney and I'm not saying nothing
until I talk to an attorney especially
if you're talking to Federal people batf
these people will lie cheat steal they
will do anything they can
to hammer you their whole purpose in
life is to hammer you I don't want you
to think well what nice guys so maybe we
can just work this out why don't we just
talk or maybe we can get things worked
up you don't talk to these people folks
and you're talking to somebody you learn
the hard way
you do not talk to these people ever I
don't care if you think you're a nice
guy and you want to be courteous I don't
think you think if you're going to work
it out I don't think you think if you're
gonna you're smarter in the air and you
can beat them I'm telling you you don't
talk to him period you button that hatch
an old wiser legal defense counsel told
me one time he said the first rule is
keep your big mouth shut
I said okay what's the second row keep
your big mouth shut
he said what's the third rule keep your
big mouth shut
is it after you file them three rules
the rest is easy
it's when you open your big mouth that
you get in trouble
not that you would do anything wrong
anyway but they'll twist lie cheat and
steal and make it into something you
didn't do and before you know it you
won't even recognize what's happened I'm
telling you it's happened to me
so I'm telling you as a friend I'm not
telling you as a smart ass or anything
else I'm telling you as a friend do not
talk to these people they they do not
have your best interest and hurt and you
may think well they're the government
and then they're responsible and they
mean well well they don't they don't
mean well they don't mean you're well
and they will Jam you believe me
and if you're not real good at getting
out of it you can you can be in a lot of
trouble all right now
let's look at this Miranda decision in
the absence of other effective measures
the following procedures to safeguard
the fifth member privileges must be
observed the person in custody must
prior to interrogation be clearly
informed that he has a right to remain
silent and that anything he says will be
used against him in a court of law
he must be clearly informed that he has
a right to consult with a lawyer and he
to have a lawyer with him during
interrogation do that please
and that if he is in the general lawyer
will be appointed to represent him all
right if the individual indicates prior
to endearing questioning that he wishes
to remain silent the interrogation must
cease
if he states that he wants an attorney
to question him must cease until an
attorney is present where an
interrogation is conducted without the
presence of an attorney and a statement
is taken a heavy burden rests on the
government to demonstrate that the
defendant knowingly and intelligently
waived his constitutional Consul right
don't test that theory
but I'm telling you it works I did it
what are the individual answers some
questions during interrogation or
custody interrogation he has not waived
his privilege it may invoke his right to
remain silent thereafter the warnings
require that the waiver needed are in
the absence of a fully effective
equivalent prerequisite to the admission
or admissibility of any statement
inculpability or exculpability made by
the defendant the limitations on the
interrogation process required for the
protection of the individual's
constitutional rights should not cause
and undue interference with the proper
system of law enforcement as
demonstrated by the procedures of the
FBI and the safeguards afforded to other
jurisdiction in each of these cases the
statements were obtained under
circumstances that did not meet
constitutional standards for
protection of the privilege against
self-incrimination now this is the big
one folks this is the one they're
talking about did you properly mirandize
him was he mirandized was she the
mirandize Athena mirandize you they got
to throw the case out almost always
it's very hard to go forward
with the case if they're Witnesses are
excludable from the presentation of the
case
now I personally got lucky on this one
folks
and I thought I was really really good
and I am really really good
but you want to know something I have a
different standard of equity and lot and
I treat everybody kindly and I basically
give them courtesy and I basically try
and be a regular Joe and I basically uh
basically just find out what the heck
was going on with this case
I promise you I would never do that
again I would dummy up like there's no
tomorrow I wouldn't say nothing not that
I do anything wrong but here's the thing
these people lied so bad they put so
much trash in in the record I was in
shock
I couldn't believe that anybody would
deliberately do such a thing
but they will
so I'm telling you as a friend do not
talk to these people especially batf
people they are not honorable people
they don't hold they do not recognize
the honor you serve
they are not honorable people their
whole purpose is to hammer you into a
position of Ridiculousness
so I'm telling you if they come in to
talk to you for whatever reason I don't
care what you dummy up you don't say
nothing you got me you hire an attorney
you get an attorney there and you don't
talk to the attorney tells you to
that's what I'm telling you as a friend
okay that's Miranda versus Arizona now
there's four Miranda cases this is the
leading case there is a Miranda warning
case that actually locks down the steps
of the warning and then there's a
Miranda interrogation case which which
locks out the standards for uh in
custody jail interrogations okay
now
a word to the Y should be sufficient and
I shouldn't have to ever say nothing
about that again believe me I learned a
valuable lesson
you cannot assume that everybody is a
good guy there are some bad ones out
there
and I found them
now the next case we're going to talk
about is Norton versus Shelby County
recorded at 118 volume
United States reports page 425 basically
that says an unconstitutional Act is not
law it confers no rights it imposes no
duties affords no protections it creates
no office it is in legal contemplation
as an inoperative as though it had never
been passed okay and that's what this
this case holds all right
now I'm telling you you go read the case
don't screw around the judge asks you
questions about the case you better know
about what it says right
because if he thinks she didn't read it
he's going to throw your case out
the court follows the decision of the
highest court of the state in construing
the Constitution and the laws of the
state unless they conflict with or
impair the F efficacy of some principle
of the Federal Constitution or of the
federal statutes or a rule of the
commercial or general law the decision
of the state courts on questions
relating to the existence of its
subordinate tribunals and the
eligibility and election or appointment
of their officers and the passage of its
laws are conclusive upon federal courts
all right
now
the most important some of the most
important thing is while acts of de
facto incumbent of an office lawfully
created by law and existing are often
held to be binding from reasons of
public policy that's a very important
Point Public Policy you want to watch
out for the terms public policy it's
often confused with the state's right of
imminent domain of police Powers police
powers and public policy are almost the
same thing set ones done without law
because we wants to and the other is
done because they're claiming a police
authority to do so all right
but when they're talking about public
policy the acts of the person assuming
to fill and perform the duties of an
office which does not exist
can have no validity whatever in law
okay
an unconstitutional Act is not a law it
confers no rights it imposes no duties
it affords no protection it creates no
office it is in legal contemplation as
inoperative as though it had never been
passed okay because everybody got that
now this basic first portion of this
program
is designed clearly
to help you
and if you take these basic cases on
this one page you will have gone a long
way in getting your constitutional
rights back okay
now we're asking you
pay attention
learn your Constitution we're going to
go into some heavier stuff through the
second portion of it
but we want you to learn your
Constitution this book here is a
Citizens rule book
it also has jury instructions in it and
also has a lot of important arguments in
it some of the important arguments in it
go along with what we've been talking
about right
all lawsuitary pregnant Constitution or
null and void Marbury versus Madison 5
yes 137 I already argue that when we're
right secured by the Constitution our
involved there can be no ruler lawmaking
or legislation which would abrogate or
about them that's again Miranda versus
Arizona an unconstitutional Act is not
law it confers no rights it imposes no
duties affords no protection it creates
no office all right that's Norton versus
Shelby County which we just talked about
the general rule is an unconstitutional
statute though having the former name of
laws in reality no law but it's holy
void all right 16th amateur is Prudence
second section 177 and also 256.
officers of the Court have no immunity
when violating constitutional right from
liability that's on versus City of
Independence Maine versus Thibodaux no
State shall converge security Liberties
and their Privileges and issue licenses
in the fees for Murdock versus
Pennsylvania
if the state does convert Liberty or
privilege into a privileged citizen can
engage in Array with impunity that
shuttles records of Birmingham Alabama
the court is to protect against any
encroachment of constitutionally secured
Liberties that's Boyd versus United
States constitutional rights must be
interpreted in favor of Citizen that's
barriers versus the United States we
have covered all of these cases
thoroughly so that you can see clearly
all right we're trying to teach you how
to better effectively use your
Constitution okay
we're trying to get it down to a serious
program
and this this book here also brings out
all these court cases right notice it's
got Norton versus Shelby County in here
it's got Miranda versus Arizona it's got
Madison fire Marbury versus Madison it's
got uh
the jury has a right to judge both the
law as well as the fact John Jay first
Chief Justice U.S Supreme Court the jury
has the right to determine both the law
and the fact Samuel Chase U.S Supreme
Court Justice 1796 singer you know all
right the jury has the power to bring a
verdict in the teeth of both law in fact
Oliver Wendell Holmes U.S Supreme Court
the law itself is on trial quite as much
as the cause which is to be decided
Harlan F Stone 12 chief justice U.S
Supreme Court the pages of History shine
on instances of the jury's exercise of
its prerogative to disregard
instructions of the judge that's the
United States versus Doherty 473 fed
second 113.
all right now we're going to wrap up
this first part here basically
we want we want you folks to hopefully
not be overwhelmed take your time play
the tape several times it'll it'll come
to you it's really not that hard
we want you to have a new reverence for
your Constitution
we want you to know that a lot of brave
Soldiers paid for it with their life we
want you to know that they died
miserably some of them
and we want you to know that this is a
serious very serious thing here we want
you to know that we love you America and
we want you to know we need your help to
learn your Constitution so you can
better and effectively
come forward pick that book up walk out
there and shake that book and say shaken
in Boss
all right now that we've gone over the
Constitution and we talked about some of
the ways that you can use it now we're
going to go into some of the ways that
you can apply it okay the things to do
first of all is when you pull over try
not to demonstrate any rapid movements
or any uh
like you're reaching under the seat or
you're reaching in the glove box keep
your hands where you can be seen do not
overreact try and be calm talk to the
officer in a mellow voice uh don't yell
or holler use profanity whatsoever
basically it's yes sir you know what can
I do for you sir
they'll usually ask you to produce your
documentation you have license proof of
insurance and the registration of the
vehicle okay now we're going to go into
a lot of issues on those
programming to cover that to show you
some of the things that you can do and
what you can opt to do
also I recommend that you treat the
officer as I told the other gentleman
there very courteously because uh
that is going to get you a lot further
ahead than giving them a lot of negative
hype or trying to shout out shout them
or give them a lot of static so my
honest counsel is let me show you how we
proceed uh
most of the time you will be able to
leave the scene without any Serious
injury you might have a ticket or this
or that but we'll show you how to deal
with that okay
but you need to be understanding that uh
this party is an armed party and you
don't want to do any movements that's
going to cause him to overreact to a
injury of you yeah
and you'll find that a lot of times this
is the most dangerous thing a police
officer does to stop people all day
because he never knows when somebody
might do some really serious traumatic
thing you know so they're very nervous
about this and the quicker you can
relieve their nervousness and just be a
regular person and let them realize
you're just gonna
talk any plain and common voice the
sooner
you're going to be in a communicative
situation now obviously you're going to
find out real quick if you've got a
Cooperative officer or not if you don't
have a Cooperative officer then you're
going to be in court anyway
so the best thing I can tell you is be
patient just let us follow along with
our program and we'll be happy to
demonstrate again we would like to let
you know that your best defenses are in
your Constitution
that that Constitution is a viable
contract that it is enforceable in the
court of law under the statute of frauds
that you have a right to claim those
rights that the burden is on you to
claim them timely and the key word here
is timely or you lose the rate so you
want to be uh cognizant of your rights
and be able to timely speak up okay now
let's go on to a couple of things here
we're going to
we're going to concentrate as we did
before on our main basic cases we also
want to give you some further advance
programming
thank you
the book The Federalist Papers by
Madison Hamilton and Jay those are the
gentlemen that wrote the United States
Constitution okay
and you want the mentor Edition because
it is the unabridged Edition
now the Supreme Court has ruled in the
case of Cohen versus Virginia that's
recorded at six wheat reporter volume
volume 6 page two right now wheat is an
old report and this was done in 1821 so
you may have to go to your leading Law
Library around like we go to Michigan
University of Michigan or we go to
Detroit college of law but
you want a very these pages will be so
old you'll have to worry how you turn
them without trying to screw them up
but the Supreme Court ruled in the
manner of corn versus Virginia six week
two that this book The Federalist Papers
was the exact record of the intent of
the framers of the Constitution Madison
Hamilton and Jay those are the guys that
wrote the Constitution so obviously
being able to read their published uh
thoughts as they were doing this
constitution is very very
forceful in terms of
constitutional interpretation in the
intent of the lawmaker is the law and it
shall be liberally enforced in favor of
you you are at a query in tenant and
expressly designated beneficiary Academy
so every everything you can do to
enhance your position
in terms of how your lawmakers thought
when they framed this constitution
clearly makes your case even more
stronger for the Constitution be
interpreted in favor of you so we
recommend you get a copy of this
Federalist Papers you read it cover to
cover you want the mentor Edition
because that's the unabridged Edition
you'll find some of the other editions
got some of the pages pulled out okay
now we want to get into some of the
cases basically the second program that
we have here is the advanced section we
are going to be covering procedures
we're going to be teaching you how to be
your own Council we're going to be
telling you some facts and issues on
what to do what happens when you get
pulled over how do you exercise your
rights in a timely fashion we're going
to be talking about
some of the the problems that are going
on in America today we're going to be
talking about some of the studies that
have been done
we just had a law review study put out
by this uh
this lady here
her name is uh
Joyce Lee Malcolm
Joyce Lee Malcolm she started out
working for the uh
the anti-gun people
she is a Harvard dust
a Harvard uh
legal scholar she is very very
knowledgeable she researched the right
to keep in Mirror arms of the people
back to the 1700s in England
and she came to the honest belief after
all of her research and of course she
would be following her research because
she is a person of very Acclaim in terms
of her study
she researched it back to the 1700s and
found out that yep our right to keep in
bear arms is a positive right it has
come from serious law all the way back
to the Magna Carta
she published a book
and the book here is
to keep in their arms it's a rather
extensive book
okay
uh you might it's not hard to get a hold
of it did take us about 10 days of
ordering it to get a hold of it
but it's a definitive study on the right
to keep in bear arms that verifies the
the Holdings that your average person
whose NRA oriented who basically is
constitutionally oriented is going to be
happy to have which is basically the
right to keep bear arms is a protected
right that goes back with great legal
scholarly study okay
so these are a couple things that you
can use to help you defend okay
we need to understand that at the
beginning of every one of these laws
there is an enabling Clause that
basically says how the law shall be
brought into being
and there is an argument
that the law
that is presently here today is based on
some law on the past okay
and almost on every one of these
constitutions all the way up through our
history through the Articles of
Confederation through the U.S
Constitution through various state
constitutions they'll have an enabling
law in the beginning and of course the
the enabling law just allows them to
bring their version of The Constitution
of what rights are there today that the
rights that were had before or carried
on plus are further delineated by this
constitution but at no time do they have
a right to abridge the previous document
now going all the way back to the Magna
Carta you can see the decisions where it
comes down the Magna Carta the
Declaration of Independence the Articles
of Confederation the United States
Constitution the Virginia acts of
concession the Northwest Ordinance the
Northwest Territorial government the
Northwest Territorial division Indiana
the Indiana Michigan territorial
division the enabling acts and that's
what I'm I'm trying to explain to you
today the Michigan organization
in submitting Alternatives and the
Michigan is sent to a condition of
admission and then the state of Michigan
became a state in 1837. now this is just
from my area so I'm trying to give you
an example there is then we have a
constitution of 1835 we have a
constitution of 1850 we have a
constitution of 1908 we have a
constitution of 1963.
institutions comes by the enabling acts
in the beginning of it state that
everything that was before
guaranteed is brought forward okay
so everything that is before is brought
forward and carried forward and if
anything is supposed to be made stronger
okay it's never made weaker it's made
stronger or it's equal to so all of the
rights brought forward are carried all
the way back from the Magna Carta as a
line of succession
so this is how you historically review
Trends and where what and how it comes
from and how uh authorities are
established in love okay the important
thing to understand we have our court
cases here we're going to start giving
you examples of court cases as we go and
we're going to show you how you can
exercise rates one of the first cases
that we are going to bring
is basically the right to travel all
right now there's a lot of people that
are interested in this particular issue
and license plates and driver's licenses
and all this and you have a lot of
programming that's uh
that's uh problematic from this and you
have a lot of people that are looking to
argue
so we want to share some basic arguments
with you we're going to claim a First
Amendment right to travel and we're
going to claim also a fifth amendment
it's guaranteed under the Fifth
Amendment of due process and equal
protection under the law all right now
we come down
we looked up in our state constitution
and this is uh our constitution
and basically we have protected a right
to travel
okay the freedom to travel is a
fundamental right that should be
unlimited by statutes rules or
regulations which unreasonably burden or
restrict movement okay now then a law
which substantially affects or penalizes
the exercise of the right to travel may
be justified only by a compelling State
interest and must be tailored carefully
to avoid unnecessary infringement on the
right okay now when we come down here we
start reading some of these arguments
you'll notice these little letters here
that say freedom to travel throughout
the United States has long been
recognized as a basic right under the
Federal Constitution C note 54 you see
everybody see this little note 54 here
again we're going to take this node 54
we're going to come down here in the
very first case that we have is Shapiro
versus Thompson
this is recorded it
at 394. that's volume 394 us page 618.
and I just happen to have a copy of case
here they're talking about
the purpose of inhibiting Migration by
needy persons into a state is
constitutionally impermissible all right
all citizens must be free to travel
throughout the United States uninhibited
by statutes rules or regulations which
unreasonably burden or restrict this
movement all right if a law has no other
purpose than to chill assertions of
constitutional rights by penalizing
those who choose to exercise them it is
patently unconstitutional
all right does everybody pick up on the
gist of the argument here equal
protection Clause prohibits
a portion of State Services according to
part-tax contributions of its citizens
any classification which serves to
penalize the exercise of a right of
Interstate travel unless shown to be
necessary to promote a compelling
government interest is unconstitutional
okay now that's clearly established now
we go into the case and we come to find
out
thank you it says that the right
the right finds no explicit mention in
the Constitution this is what I was
trying to tell you you got to use a
little bit of uh wisdom you read between
the lines in other words what is your
right to life liberty and pursuit of
happiness
what does it mean to you think about it
it there you know you can look at the
exact words the rate of life liberty and
pursuit of happiness ducky what's that
mean I have no idea well I'm telling you
to start having an idea because when you
have an idea they gotta listen
so you have an idea and you say I have a
right to travel freely and uncovered
right now that ain't right so Elementary
was conceived from the beginning they're
talking about the right to travel that a
rate was so Elementary was conceived
from the beginning to be necessary
concomitant of the stronger Union the
Constitution created in any event
freedom to travel throughout the United
States has long been recognized as a
basic right under the Constitution we've
established that the right is clearly
there
so you were right you had a feeling that
you had a right to travel and you were
right there is such a right there okay
one of the ways you could find arguments
on that would be to go into the
Federal digest at the local library go
down by your Supreme Court cases
there'll be a set of red books called
the federal digest right next to the
shepherd citations you look up the book
called words and phrases and in the book
words and phrases you ask for the right
to travel it'll give you every Supreme
Court case that has anything to do with
the right to travel okay one of the
leading cases is this case Shapiro
versus Thompson that it's such a basic
rate it doesn't even need to be
mentioned okay it is important that you
be able to back your arguments up in
other words it's one thing to pick the
argument up well here we go in moving
from jurisdiction to jurisdiction they
were exercising their constitutional
right and any classification which
penalizes the exercise of the right
unless shown to be necessary to promote
a compelling government interest is
unconstitutional right now the reality
was they exercised their right to Timely
Travel all right
and the state didn't want to allow that
all right now let's flip back here first
of all the Constitution is the supreme
law of the land right we establish that
who said so Marbury versus Madison
5us137 1803 the constitution of these
United States is the supreme law of land
any lawn conflicts null and void of law
now we know that the constitution is
supreme we know that the right is
clearly established in Shapiro versus
Thompson Kenny State arbitrarily and
erroneously convert a secured Liberty in
this case the right to travel freely
uncovered into a privilege and issue a
license and a fee for it obviously we
have decided that in Murdoch versus
Pennsylvania clearly
no state may convert a secure Liberty
into a privilege now does everybody see
how we plug that in just like on your
computer you you fill in the blanks okay
you have the court case it says no stake
and Giver delivery and a privilege
initial license and fee for it what
right are we talking about the right to
travel freely uncommon so you plug that
in so does the state have a right to
require you to have a license for the
exercise of their right no
does everybody see that
now what happens if the state requires
you to have the license Shuttlesworth
versus Birmingham Alabama you can ignore
the license and engage in Array with
impunity that means they can't punish
you
know what happens if they pull you over
they give you the ticket well you're
going to go to court and you're going to
fight it you're going to file a brief
we're going to show you how to do that
at a later time
I'll show you exactly what to put down
there but these are the cases you're
going to be putting down on your on your
memorandum of laws so why you have a
reason to feel that you're right first
at your constitutional right is superior
to any law that they would put down you
have that right and they can't pass a
law that takes away that right secondly
if they do it's unconstitutional thirdly
no state may convert a secured Liberty
into a privilege and issue a license and
a fee for it and if they do you can
ignore the license in the fee and engage
and arrive with impunity shuttles right
for Birmingham Alabama and since you
have not willfully done anything evil
you have relied on your Constitution and
on the Supreme Court decisions you have
a perfect defense to the charge of
willfulness so you could not have been
charged with willfully not going and get
the license does everybody see that
okay
you have a perfect defense
United States versus Bishop for 12 years
346 defines willfulness as an evil
mortiver intent to avoid an own due to
your task on it allow the moral
certainty obviously you didn't do that
did you because you have a perfect
defense you relied on previous decisions
of the Supreme Court Shuttlesworth and
Murdoch and Marbury you relied on your
constitutional right to travel freely
and uncommon pursuant the Shapiro versus
Thompson so you have a perfect defense
so now where are we at your honor made
please record I motion for dismissal
with prejudice failure State and cause
of action for which relief can be
granted and I would like the motion to
dismiss
and I like my costs and fees for having
to defend this frivolous case
that you have a right to collect your
time for going to court all right you
submit your bill you submit your
proposed order you fill out your own
proposed order that makes the case go
faster and the judge is kind of like
that it intimidates the hell out of the
prosecutor when you do your own order
now let's say well that's how you
interpret that sir that's right sir that
is how I interpret it and 16th amateur
is prudent second section 97 says that
it shall be interpreted in my favor
because I am the query intended and
expressly designated beneficiary
decisions for the production rights and
property see Briars versus United States
273 us 28 unlawful and this that deals
with an unlawful search and seizure but
it also deals that it's supposed to be
interpreted and pay review declaring 10
and expressly designated beneficiary for
the protection of your rights and
property so they got to enforce it in
favor of you right now
Boyd versus United States comes next the
court is to protect against any
encroachment of constitutionally
uh secured Liberty it's their Duty they
have no choice they have to do it okay
all right and Norton versus Shelby
County an unconstitutional Act is not
law it can Furs no rights it imposes no
duties affords no protections it creates
no office it is in legal contemplation
as in operative though it had never been
passed
now after you write all of this stuff
down you casually say wherefore you're
enter
I pray before the center McCord for your
just and lawful relief I ask that you
dismiss this case with prejudice for
failure to State a cause of action for
which relief can be granted and I pray
to court for my just relief for having
to defend this badly frivolous and
spurious case tonight my costs are
whatever they are you submit that on
your order I have an order I have a
proposed order your honor it's in my
brief
at that point they will turn to the
prosecutor and say Well Mr prosecutor
what do you think you'd like to do about
this
and most of the time they're so
overwhelmed at this point they just go
I'll go for the dismissal urinary and
the judge will give him some slack well
never before as a young man not attorney
so literally overwhelmed when it counts
for the prosecutioner license the
attorneys
now it's not my goal to make attorneys
look bad
my goal is to make you look good my goal
is to make you understand your
Constitution
now if you happen to do it and you do it
better than the attorney God bless you
and God bless America
and if the attorney doesn't do his
homework and prepare his case I have no
sympathy for him because he shouldn't
have done what he was doing anyway
and if you had any brains he'd have
pulled you aside needed done what other
attorneys have done to me and said you
know I hate going against the prose
litigant attorney almost always they're
really really good
and you know I never get to find out if
they're really really good or they're
really really bad until I show up and
then it's too late so I'm already on the
diving board
and either the pool has water in it or
it doesn't
and usually it doesn't and it hurts when
you hit the bottom
so they don't like going against you
people they will not like going against
you if you halfway know what the hell
you're talking about they're going to be
intimidated and they I I can tell you
many many tales I I had this one
gentleman he didn't have any plates on
his car and he called him into the court
and he was standing in the hallway and
the prosecution said would you come over
here sir but I'd like to talk to you he
came in the office and he sat down
and this party said to the prosecutor
what can I do for you
the prosecutor said sir
okay so what can I do for you he said
well it's not what you can do for me I'm
the prosecutor what do you want to do in
this case well I assume there was
something I could do for you called me
in here
well what do you want to do how do you
want to plead on your case well I don't
intend to plead sir I intend to answer
in the form with the mirror such that I
do not acquiesce to quasi jurisdiction
because that's an issue if you brought
up my pleadings and braces the file with
the court
the guy's mouth was on the ground
he said are you an attorney sir he says
no I'm a truck driver
the guy absolutely was in a panic
I had the same gentleman the same
gentleman later he was working as a
bricklayer and he did the same thing
I told the prosecutor he was a
bricklayer and the guy's shot was on the
ground
see they don't anticipate that people
that that are in other jobs other than
theirs said have any brains
and it blows their doors off when all of
a sudden this bricklayer or this truck
driver can come in
in argue law and all of a sudden it's
like
shoot this guy is good
I have to treat him like he's an
attorney
so what did this guy do the first thing
he does out of the shoot he walks up to
the judge and he tells the judge he says
judge I'm going to dismiss this case
because he realized he was going to get
hammered
and the guy my guy says he can't do that
I took day off work come over here and
battle
I told him I said shut up sit down relax
you won
don't say nothing you won and the judge
broke out laughing because this guy
didn't want to quit
the judge turned to him and he said well
evidently the prosecutor doesn't want to
proceed sir I'm going to have to dismiss
the case he is the complaintant
can he do that judge he can't do that
I'm here to battle I want to go let's do
it
and the judge laughed again he says well
apparently sir I cannot sustain a
complaint that is not properly before
the court Council for prosecution has
entered a motion to dismiss and I am no
other option but to dismiss now if you
want to counter sue him that's another
case
well I'll do that I'll do that
in the meantime I told him will you be
quiet be quiet and submit your bill
submit your bill you won submit your
bill for your damages so he did he's
allowed to submit my bill in your honor
for my costs and fees for having an
offend this frivolous case and the judge
smiled because people don't usually do
that but if you win they are required to
pay you that's the rules if you lose you
pay
so the bottom line is this when you file
your papers and they turn around
and you you get a win make sure you got
your little bill in there for for your
lost time from work or any copies that
you had to make or any visits to the law
library or any what is called real and
personal damages and don't pay the
account put down exactly what you got
because if they force you to prove it
you can get busted for perjury so I
don't I don't recommend you you yeah
shall we say stretch the pad
I recommend you put down exactly what
your costs are believe me the fact that
they got beats plenty enough of a sting
and the fact they got to pay a couple
hundred dollars for your last day at
work will be more of a sting and you
will not you will get a code on your
license and the next time you get pulled
over they will just hand your license
bag and tell you think about slowing
down and have a nice day because they
don't like people like you
because you're an American
and Americans don't give up they never
surrender and they fight one judge told
me one time he said you got any kind of
idea how much money you cost this car
today and I said I hope it was a bunch
of your honor because I hope you got to
go write a whole bunch more tickets to
break even I way I figure the more
tickets you got to write the sooner the
Public's going to wake up to this theft
and maybe they'll start doing something
positive to stop this kind of stuff
because it's my my belief they should be
having masks on out there because I mean
if there was an honest Crick they'd be
having a mask on there when they robbed
the people
okay
well he didn't he didn't like that
answer too good but the bottom line is
he he knew I was right and after a while
they realize what your goals are and
they know hey this is more fun than
Edgewater Park and I want to go on all
the rides twice you know what I mean I
want to hit the wild mouse and a whole
bunch of them other rides let's do it
and see when they see that they realize
there's no point you're not going to
learn anything you're going to cost some
time money materials now the the system
is not profitable
okay so they back off they put a code on
your license they won't bother you
anymore and everybody see we took take
that line down we take the line from the
Constitution we take the line from the
right now let's think up another right
how about the right to work contract
your labor and your skill in your time
of life as you see fit
now your right to work is protected by
the Constitution under the First
Amendment again
you have a right to work and contract
you're labor and your skill in your time
of life as you see fit I get hauled into
court before uh the chief judge of this
big Court here in Oakland County I won't
give you the judge's name because he was
a fair judge and a good judge and I'm
going to let them slide but the bottom
line is this he looked just like Abe
Lincoln I mean exactly he was the
spitting image
and he leans over the chair and he says
well he says uh
it's been reported to me son that you
don't have a license to practice law is
that correct
and I looked up at him and I said judge
I'm not practicing I know what the hell
I'm doing
and the whole Court broke out laughing
he said that's pretty good that's pretty
good I like somebody with a sense of
humor
he said but that doesn't change anything
son you have to have a license to
practice law and I said your honor I'm
an unenfranchised common law free man I
live at the common law I am not a
participant in any time teen schemes a
limited liability and a joint venture
for private with an insurable interest
requirement of participate in these
illegal corporate Fonzi schemes I am
just Jobo from Kokomo down on the street
I just live at the common law and I have
a right to work and contract my labor my
skill in my time of life as I see fit
not as some third-party arbitrary and
capricious Bar Association sees fit and
they had loaded the court with all these
attorneys and they were oh
here they go
I said your honor
the state of Michigan arbitrarily and
erroneously converted my right to work
into a privilege and issued a license
and a fee for it that's unconstitutional
your honor Marbury versus Madison 5
us-137 1803
anything in conflict or repugnancy is an
unavoid of law okay can you see that all
right versus Madison and since the state
converted my right into a privilege and
issued a license and a fee for it we're
not Chris is Pennsylvania no state may
convert a secured Liberty and their
privilege and issue a license and a fee
for it
and if they do Shuttlesworth versus
Birmingham Alabama says I may ignore the
license and the fee and engage in the
right with impunity that means you can't
punish me
in U.S versus Bishop 412 us 346 defines
wovenous as an evil mode over intent to
avoid an on-duty or task under the law
with a moral certainty I submit your
honor I couldn't have done an evil task
because I was totally following the
constitution in the U.S Supreme Court
I would submit the prosecution council's
burden is to prove that I did willfully
annoyingly avoid a known due to your
task under the law and namely to get the
license and I would submittee
specifically precluded he cannot perform
his task and therefore I had motion for
dismissal with prejudice Pharisee the
cause of action for which relief from
new granted and I'd kind of like to
collect my costs and fees for having to
defend this frivolous spurious complaint
the judge rolls back in his chair with a
great big smile and he turns to counsel
for the prosecution he says well Mr Rose
what do you think we ought to do about
this young gentleman
the prosecution mounts back how about we
honor the motion to dismiss your honor
the judge says good answer because I
don't think you're ready for this kid
today and the whole Court broke out
laughing
an old gentleman walked up to me and he
said son I just want to shake your hand
and tell you
you gotta have like King Kong
because you just slammed the bar
association right into the ground on top
of that
I've been an attorney for 57 years and I
just want to shake your hands sir and
tell you that was one of the most
magnificent arguments that I've ever had
the privilege to hear in a court of law
now he was an honest attorney and he
realized what kind of a chain was around
his ankle with this bar association and
these lawyers they resent that they
really do there are people just like you
they don't like to have any chains on
them but they hadn't had anybody quite
show them how to get those chains off
and when they saw somebody do it in
their own skill with their own you know
with their own cards on their own
playing field it actually impressed the
hell out of them I had several gentlemen
come up and shake my hand that day
needless to say the case was dismissed
and I've been helping little people
getting jammed for years
every time I see some little person get
jammed I'm out there flipping that
wrench
zingy zingy zingy
and I flipped that wrench on them so
good
usually they just back off Dr kevorkin
was a perfect example the poor man was
just trying to help these poor people
they were jamming him Every Which Way
but Loose
so what we did is we taught him a thing
called coaranto
I got a hold of his attorney and
submitted all of the arguments all right
now we're going to bring up several
arguments right here
we're gonna bring up police powers
and we're gonna bring up corento
four onto is a basic break that goes
back to English law ancient English law
okay here it is right here all right
florento let's read it
for warrento
in Old English practice a writ in a
nature of a writ of right for the king
against him
who claimed or assured any office
franchise or Liberty to inquire by what
Authority
he's he supported his claim in order to
determine the right it lay also in the
case of a non-user or long neglected no
long neglectively franchise franchises
Corporation or misuser or abuser of a
franchise being a writ commanding the
defendant to show by what warrant he
exercises such a corporate franchise
having never had any Grant of it or
having forfeited it by neglect or abuse
a common law writ designed to test
whether a person exercising power is
legally entitled to do so an
extraordinary proceeding prerogative in
nature addressed to preventing a
continued exercise of authority
unlawfully asserted
Johnson versus Manhattan Railroad
Company New York recorded at volume 289
United States page 479. now it is
intended to prevent exercise of powers
that are not conferred by law and is not
ordinarily available to regulate the
manner of exercising such power now
what we did
see police powers are defined as the
right of eminent domain of a state or
political subdivision to enact laws for
the common good welfare let's pull that
out police power this is out of blacks
Law Dictionary folks
an authority conferred
by the American constitutional system in
the 10th Amendment U.S Constitution upon
the individual states and in turn
delegated to the local governments
through which they are enabled to
establish a special Department of police
right such laws and regulations says
tend to prevent the commission of Fraud
and or crime and secured generally the
Comfort safety morals health and
prosperity of its citizens by preserving
the public order and preventing a
conflict of rights in the common
intercourse of the citizens and ensuring
to each and uninterrupted enjoyment
everybody would get that word enjoyment
of all the Privileges conferred upon him
or her by the general laws the
Constitution the power of the state to
place restraints on personal freedoms
and property rights of persons for the
protection of the public safety health
and morals or to promotion of the public
convenience in general
propriety the police power is subject to
limitations of the federal and state
constitutions that everybody catch that
and especially to the requirements of
due process police power is the exercise
of The Sovereign right of the government
to promote order safety security health
morals and general welfare within
constitutional
limitations right is an essential
attribute
Marshall versus Kansas City Missouri
recorded at 35
volume
Southwest Second that's another reporter
Southwest 2nd page 877 all right now
police powers are the right amendment
domain of a state or political Vision to
an AG laws for the common gun welfare in
a curb crime within constitutional
limitations and the key words in that
whole thing are within constitutional
limitation and then it tells you to see
the Tenth Amendment
when you see the 10th Amendment and
believe it or not you can go look up the
books and it divides the 10th Amendment
real
here pull over here
the burdens placed on the national
government as a result of state's
regulation okay
regulation of their Internal Affairs
save as Congress may act to remove them
constitute normal incidents of operation
within the same territory of a dual
system of government and no immunity of
national government from such burden is
to be implied from the Constitution all
right
all right pen Diaries versus milk
Control Commission right a Pennsylvania
case recorded at United's uh
volume 318 U.S 261 the people of the
United States residing within any state
are subject to two governments one state
and the other National but there need be
no conflict between the two because the
powers which one possesses the other
does not that's United States versus
Crookshank a very famous Supreme Court
case within the area of delegated powers
expressed or implied this amendment does
not reduce the powers of the United
States that's U.S versus Manning
recorded at 215 Federal supplement
that's another reporter page 272. the
Federal Union has only those Powers
expressly conferred on it and those
reasonably implied from powers granted
while each state has all governmental
Powers except such as the People by the
Constitution have conferred on the
United States
denied to the state are reserved to the
people themselves Anderson versus
Gladden recorded at volume 188 Federal
supplement 666. it's a bad number
all right it is when Federal legislation
attempts to confer power upon the
national government that it is not
within
it's not within the express or implied
power is given by the Constitution that
the legislation becomes vulnerable to
this amendment
okay now what are we talking about here
Brady Bill huh
within their powers they have no 10th
Amendment powers to take away the Second
Amendment
does that make sense to everybody they
don't have any powers to go and take
away the Second Amendment or any other
Amendment the Fourth Amendment the Fifth
Amendment nothing and the Ninth
Amendment precluded them from adding on
to the constitution in such a way that
would take away the powers so by the
Ninth Amendment and the Tenth Amendment
they're totally lacked out from doing a
lot of the things that they do but see
you got to know that and be able to
timely exercise
so it's very important to understand
your 10th Amendment
when and
in the human events it becomes necessary
and proper
and this is what we did this is what we
did to help out Dr Kevorkian we made
sure that his lawyer got this knowledge
we went in there and we dug up a writ of
Fort warranto
a rid of quaranto all right now this
doesn't look like much but let me tell
you something what we're talking about
doing here
see most cities at least in the state of
Michigan are by Public Act 230 public
Acts or Public Act 287 or public accent
and every one of them there is a rights
and power section usually it's recorded
at 2.2 or 3.1 and it basically says and
I quote subject to the Constitution of
the United States and the general laws
of the state of Michigan the city of or
the township of has rights and Powers
too and then it starts listing the
rights and Powers right to have a police
department right to have a fire
department right to have a city all
right and it starts listing all these
Powers now the anti-thesis to the
argument is that if they're not within
the Constitution of the United States
and the general laws of the state of
Michigan they don't have any rights and
powers does that make sense to everybody
in other words they're in violation of
their corporate charter their franchise
they promised they would be within the
Constitution of the United States and
the general laws of the state of
Michigan now
arguments so I want to really push this
one home I want you to understand
whenever these little townships and
these little cities and what have you
they started acting like King Farooq and
that you're you're you don't matter and
they don't got to listen to you this is
what I want you to do you ask them a
pointy question and asked them are you
violating my constitutionally secured
civil rights by however you claim they
are
because if you are you have just waived
your right to be the city of
and I'll laugh at you for a little bit
okay then you explain to him Public Act
230 of public acts which states the
rights and power sections of the
Constitution of the United States and
the general laws of the state of
Michigan you have rights and Powers the
anti-thesis to that argument is if
you're not going to be within the
Constitution of the United States or to
generalize of the state of Michigan and
you're going to violate my
constitutional rights and trample my
rights what we're going to do here is
we're going to go for a writ of mandamus
in quo warranto
well that's a legal term fancy legal
term
but it is an ancient law that goes way
back to England in the ancient times
and basically here is a judgment and a
capius action for it right
you put down here the case the case came
on regularly for trial before the
honorable and you put the judge's name
in there whatever it is on a jury trial
or non-jury trial dated such and such
the name appeared as for your counsel in
the name appeared for your opposing
counselor right the court heard the
testimony and examined the proofs
offered by the parties the court
considered itself fully advised in the
premise filed in its findings of fact
and conclusions of Law and directed The
judgments be entered in accordance with
such findings right
which means they figured out that they
violated your constitutional rights they
didn't have a right to violate your
constitutional rights and in the hearing
you showed they violated your
constitutional rights and the judge
figured out they violated your
constitutional rights so now for your
prayer for Relief we're going to get
this quota rental
and this is exactly what happened to The
Honorable doctor
Kevorkian you'll notice that he was in
jail and they were hammering the tail at
him the next thing you know everything
got real quiet nobody said nothing and
then the next thing you know they were
letting him go and they were mine in
their business
now this is how it happened
it is therefore ordered and adjudged and
decreed one defendant Corporation the
city of you put down what name has
violated provisions of the act under
which it was created and also has
violated provisions of Public Act 230 of
Public Act section 2.2 rates and power
section in other words it didn't uphold
the Constitution of the United States to
the general laws of the state of
Michigan defendant Corporation the city
of whatever Pontiac whatever
accordingly has forfeited its Charter
and become
liable to be dissolved by the abuse of
its power
how much money am I talking about here
folks
we'd be in about nine decimal places
plus wouldn't know what you think
now do you think they're going to buy
this a little doctor when they're
looking at
shutting down a major city
what do you think is going to happen
everything's going to get quiet they're
going to let the good doctor go same
thing for you now
defendant Corporation you name him
therefore is dissolved and the corporate
rights Privileges and franchise of
Defense are declared forfeited to the
people
defendant Corporation you name them is
trustees directors managers and other
official officers attorneys and agents
are forever restrained and enjoying from
exercising any of the corporate
franchise Powers rights and or
privileges previously
exercised by defendant said City and
from collecting or receiving any debts
and or
demands belonging to or held by
defendant City whatever and from paying
out or in any manner interfering with
transferring or delivering to any person
any of the deposits money Securities
property and effects of the defendant
City or held by it
you name a trustee which the state would
do probably the Attorney General after
your complaint is filed is appointed
receiver of all of the property real and
personal things in action and effects of
defendant City Corporation held by
invested in defendants or in or to which
defendant may be in any wise interested
or entitled there too
plaintiff the people of the state of
whatever that's US state of Michigan
shall recover of defendant
Corporation whatever city of the sum of
Damages real and personal got me they
don't like that when you start talking
now because they can go 100 million
three times that amount of punitive
damage as they get a little upset
as costs and disbursements of this
action and the receivers is directed to
pay the sum out of their pocket to
whoever the Attorney General but you can
have a person stipulated on there as an
injured party now you put down there
the honorable Judge so-and-so
presiding
the date entered
and you he signs that and that city is
no longer a city
you see when they violate your
Constitution this is one of the most
powerful tools that you can use
and when you jam this on you better wear
a bulletproof vest to cart because
you're probably gonna get shot at by the
time you get home
but it's nice to threaten you know you
just threaten
just drop one of them in the mail and
say if I don't get reasonable cause for
my action in the near future you're
gonna get one of these in the mail for
real
here is a summons for quaranto
this is for the start of the thing right
here summons form 41 by the way you can
get this in 21 amgurus
forms and practice
you're practical and practical forms and
practice
all right you name the party you put
down there who you are the people of the
state of Michigan versus you are
summoned to appear before what's In
which court on such and such a date to
show by what Authority you claim to have
you send or enjoy the rights and
Liberties and franchise namely the
corporation city of set out and
complained of in such and such a Time
summons and further to do and receive
all things which the court shall then
order concerning you
this is kind of like pulling their
driver's license for drunk driving
now that's an oversimplification
but sometimes these City uh Halls
operate like a drunken sailor
and they just think they can abuse
citizens rights and trash them
you know who I am
oh and I don't care
you know who I am I your boss I'm the
people
you're elected to work for me
and I'm trying to be nice so I'd
appreciate it if you just we can sit
down and work this out but if we can't
work this out I'm gonna sack it to you
baby you got me and that's basically how
I feel about it now we can get into some
of these other things
right here this is a very important
point I'm trying to get this across the
people and you try and tell them and
they kind of look at you with this blank
stare-eyed look
in the constitution of the state of
Michigan the latest and greatest the
very first thing they talk about notice
it says section one
all political power is inherent in the
people government is instituted for
their equal benefit security and
protection now let me ask you a question
do you feel equal benefit
I don't
you know equal protection and
discrimination no person shall be denied
ego protection of the laws
right
nor shall any person be denied the
enjoyment of the Civil or political
rights or be discriminated against any
exercise thereof because of religion
race color or national origin the
legislature shall implement this section
by appropriate legislation
you know and they start going down
through all the freedom of worship
you know I mean this is what we're
talking about here folks
you know your rights you got them you
don't know him you don't got them
we get back in here to police Powers
generally
this is something you gotta understand
generally the police power is the
exercise of The Sovereign right of the
government to promote order safety and
health and morals and the general
welfare of the society within
constitutional limits within
constitutional limits that everybody had
it within constitutional limits
generally the police power is the
exercise of The Sovereign right of the
government to promote order safety
health and moral and general welfare of
society within the Constitutional limits
as otherwise stated the police power of
the state is a power or organization of
a system of regulations to Foster the
health order and comfort of the people
and to prevent and or punish
injuries and offenses to the public
right
but it has to be within constitutional
limitations and it Embraces all rules
for the protection of life liberty and
property
I mean that's a contradiction of logic
today folks that doesn't happen you and
I both know it
I mean who are they kidding ain't
kidding me
okay
so it's up to you and it's up to me and
we got to get a hold of this book right
here
you can hold this Constitution and you
start learning that Constitution and you
quote a chapter and verse and guess what
you'll notice a unique different change
one after a while they start to listen
and you actually affect what is called
positive chain
and every time they see you and that
goofy hat you wear they go huh
for God's sake don't give that guy no
ticket I have actually been pulled over
listening to the program didn't have no
plates on my card
policeman called he says you got a
positive idea in a guy and a friend of
mine was taping an office police radio
he said yeah it's him
he said well for God's sake don't give
that guy no ticket
and the guy says sorry she ain't got no
plates on his car I said I don't give a
damn money I got on his car don't give
that guy no ticket
he said but Sergey told me he's just
been waiting to fight it and beat it all
the way to the Supreme Court and I wrote
that on the ticket he says you get that
guy ticket I said I just told you not to
give that guy a ticket what are you
death you got some problem with your
hearing
said I told you not to give that guy a
ticket now why did you give that guy a
ticket he's searching and no plates on
the car so I told you I don't care what
he ain't got I don't care
this is all recorded on a radio
broadcast
so the everybody was laughing the police
were laughing everybody was laughing his
buddies were laughing they were ripping
them over the radio the sergeant told
him all right knock it off clear than
that this is serious
he said uh fine he said you give him a
ticket he says fine he says tomorrow
morning 9 o'clock I want you to be in
here when the city attorney comes in
here and he says you're going to
personally deliver the ticket to him and
he ain't going to be real happy with you
because he hates that guy every time he
goes to court that guy blows his doors
off he looks like a fool
you give the guy a ticket now he's got
to go to court
so sure enough we go to court
come up before the court
judge starts operating like a prosecutor
he starts asking me all kind of
Discovery question I call as soon as
they call the case now this is something
important you gotta understand you're
going to be your own attorney and you
got to know all the programming when you
hear him call your case you get off your
tail feather and you run right up there
as quick and as speedingly as possible
without knocking anybody down and you
say ready your honor you state your
appearance I'm so-and-so hearing before
this honorable Court I am standing as my
owner counsel in my state it's under
article on Section 13. I've appointed
myself my own attorney and I'm ready to
proceed with my administrative and
procedural matters and at this time your
honor me a please record a motion for
dismissal with prejudice Fair state of
cause of action week for me granted
Bingo no I apologize if I'm talking too
fast I'm gonna try and slow down a
little bit but when you when you're in
court as much as I am you just learn you
need to talk faster you lose
so I apologize if I'm going a little too
fast I'm gonna slow down I'm trying to
make it easier for you folks okay
but the judge bips off right away wow
you got a ticket on such and such I said
oh you're honor I said are you the judge
the disinterested third party this
training this case the tire effect he
said yes
I said okay I said is this the
prosecutor over here to my right
he said yeah that's him I said okay
I said are you gonna prosecute this case
your honor he said no no I'm the judge I
said why are you asking Discovery
questions
well I just want to find out what's
going on I says isn't that his job over
there that's what he's supposed to do
he's supposed to present his case as the
prosecutor Trier of the case you're the
Trier effect he's the Trier of the case
so if you're going to operate as the
judge and the prosecutor I'm going to
object on the record as a mistrial
he said okay I'll let you internet on
the record go ahead I said okay let it
be entered on the record as an
appealable issue he said okay he said
now it's on the record he said let me
ask you this you get a ticket on
September 30th I said yes sir
he said well let me ask you this you
have any plates on your car he says no
sir
and I don't intend to get any and of
course all the people in the court oh
this guy's going to do watch this this
is going to be good
he says to me he says I assume you have
a very good reason for that and I said
yes sir and I shut up
I waited he said can I hear it
I said well you're honor I said I went
on a franchise common law Freeman I'm
not a participant in any time teams
games a limited liability and a joint
venture for private with an insurable
interest require me to participate in
these corporate Ponzi schemes I'm Just a
Little Joe from Kokomo I live on the
Block
I travel at the common law
and I have a right to travel free The
Uncommon pursuant to Shapiro versus
Thompson and that rate is so basic it
doesn't even need to be mentioned
the state of Michigan arbitrarily and
erroneously converted my right into a
privilege initiative license plate and a
fee for it
Murdoch versus Pennsylvania says no
state may convert a secured Liberty and
their privilege initial license and a
fee for it and if they do Shuttlesworth
versus Birmingham Alabama says I can
ignore the license and engage in the
right with impunity that means you can't
punish me since I have relied on
previous decisions of the U.S Supreme
Court and on constitutional defenses I
have a perfect defense for willfulness I
am immune to the prosecution therefore
prosecution Council does not have a
cause of action for which relief can be
granted and motion for dismissal of
prejudice for failure state of cause of
action for which we leave for me granted
Knight kind of like to collect my costs
and fees for having to defend this
frivolous case
the judge starts reading the ticket told
officer he'd just been waiting to get
this ticket so he could fight it and
beat it all the way to the Supreme Court
he laughed he says motion granted and he
ran off the bench before I could get my
damages
so I went out in the hall he went to the
can I waited for him he came out of the
can I served him with my papers he says
you didn't have to do that I swear I
didn't want you to be inconvenience
judge
he said okay he signed I went back into
court as a casual thing just to see what
kind of reaction would happen and I sat
down about two cases later the salad
little gentleman gets up and he stands
up there and he says your honor I'm not
quite as knowledgeable as that young
gentleman that was here just two cases
ago and I don't presume to understand
all the issues that he raised but it
really sounded good to me and I kind of
like the ditto everything he said on top
of my case everybody broke out laughing
the Jed says all right how many guys
here to Nano plates under care about
Five Guys raised their hand he says okay
everybody dismissed get the hell out of
here
and everybody broke out laughing it was
like you know
at the carnival on Christmas or
something you know it was it was a
carnival atmosphere
so I'm telling you you can affect change
and see they had all figured they said
watch this this guy is going to jail and
then all of a sudden boom I'll jump and
I mean I'm telling you it's this little
book right here this book you know
what's in this book you have power
knowledge is power
you know what's in this book and you
know how to exercise your rights in a
timely fashion you have
constitutional rights
and if you exercise them and you utilize
good judgment and be courteous and just
treat people the way you like to be
treated with a little dignity most of
the time 99 of the time I win now I will
tell you I've been to jail I mean I'm
not going to lie to you I've been but
when I go to jail they really hate it
because I usually get
oh the last time I got Five Guys cases
retried and I got another four guys out
like within 24 hours and then I got 11
guys off of their case because they
signed up for drug rehab and One bank
robber come up to me and said to me
I think you know I'm a hard case is yeah
I kind of get it and he says I want you
to know you changed my life he said I
really appreciate
you helping me with my paperwork he says
they're going to give me a new chance
they're going to let me out on probation
I'm gonna marry my girlfriend and he
started crying and he basically said
I'll never forget you Pops he says
you're some kind of guy he says God
bless you and he says I want you to know
I
I really appreciate what you did and I
found God too and between you and crazy
Charlie he said uh Crazy Charlie is a
minister that goes around to all the
jails he used to ride for the Outlaw
motorcycle gang
Crazy Charlie is clearly crazy last time
I saw Crazy Charlie was riding down
Eight Mile Road at 85 miles an hour
standing on his seat
against another guy he was standing on
his seat to see who was going to wimp
out first Crazy Charlie did about five
years in the slam because he got charged
with murdering some guy
Crazy Charlie went to Geo and he found
God
and God spared Crazy Charlie from a life
sentence in jail and crazy Charlie owes
it to God and he goes through all of the
jails and he preaches the gospel and he
basically is quite a gentleman and he's
nobody to screw with
and when we went to Chapel the kids were
all joking around pops you going to
Chapel I said oh hell yeah
he says perhaps you're a badass would
you want to go to Chapel for us let me
tell you something my man you can always
learn something and I'll tell you one of
the best places to learn it is that
Chapel so why don't you come on down and
you might learn some we go down there
and who do I see Crazy Charlie I hadn't
seen Crazy Charlie for years he looked
at me I looked at me so what the hell
you doing here so I don't want to talk
about it crazy Charlie
the guy turns around to me says pops is
there anybody in this joint you don't
know I says I'll tell you what this guy
is the guy I would listen to
because he's serious
the man is serious and he found God and
he's gonna try and help you find God and
in the end you will have peace well with
this gentleman This One bank robber
found this gentleman in between myself
and crazy Charlie he found God and I
wish you could see the piece on his face
he was in a lot of trouble
and uh we did his paperwork for him we
helped him and basically they they redid
his whole program and because he found
God they
they decided to put him out on a
lifetime parole he made restitution he
gave the money back
he changed his whole life his whole life
was changed just from that instance so
I'm telling you you go when I go into
jail it's hilarious because it's like
the jailers don't even know how to act
and it's like the one Jailer told me
when I left he shook my hand he says I'm
gonna miss you Pops he says they call me
pops because I'm older I was a little
teed off and they called me perhaps the
first time so I told this kid he said
I said what's with the flaps
I said I bet you can't even do 25
push-ups he said you proudly right pops
can you boom down I went 25 out and
here's how raise your 25 and here's
another 25. Bob's you in good shape I
said I'm gonna show you how good a shape
I mean you keep calling me pops
he says no no no no you don't understand
pops he said if you're an older
gentleman in the giant they treat you
with courtesy they call you Pops that's
just out of courtesy I said oh I guess
you can call me pops and that's cool
don't you ever think that I'm getting
old
South for you
so they laughed when I left they lined
up to shake my hand and uh even the
Jailer said he was going to be sorry to
see me go because I was helping so many
people and people were getting their
lives together and so when I go to jail
it's kind of unique I actually get a
vacation I got the top bunk and I laid
on the window and let God's sunshine in
my face and I got a suntan and guys that
say pops why do you climb up on the top
punk I says man I'm out on the beach
getting sun and raised what are you
doing
he said you know pops you something else
you're gonna make you in jail and you're
gonna make I said I'm laying out here on
the beach what you talking about
I'm laying on my bed right next to the
window and the Sun comes right through
and I'm on the beach what are you
talking about getting the sun tan
so you got to make the best of where
you're at no matter what it keeps your
spirits up
and the bottom line is this
I wouldn't have been in jail if I could
have more effectively argued my
Constitution I ended up having to do a
brief from the jail
28 pages I sharpened the pencil on the
phone on the wall there it is
this is a 28-page motion to just no this
is more than that this right here this
right here
I mean this is all
from hand longhand and when we got to
court the judge looked at it he goes sir
are you an attorney I said no
he says uh
he says uh you've been to law school I
says no sir
he says you did this from jail I says
yes sir he says you did this from jail
from memory esses yes sir it's rather
extensive it's huge
meanwhile the prosecutor kicks in she
says Joshua I gotta answer this he goes
oh hell this guy is kind of like this
guy on night court on TV and channel 2
kind of flipping
and he says oh hell yeah counselor he
says what's this a new hobby you just
took up he says uh this guy even did his
own proposed daughter I don't even have
to fill out an order he says not only in
I want it done by 8 o'clock Monday
morning so all weekend she had to go to
law library and answer all this stuff
she was not a happy camper so then she
uh proposed that I have to have a shrink
check my bolts out to see if my
batteries are charged
because if you defend your Constitution
you got to be a crazy uh turkey
and she found out I'm pretty well
squared away
I just argue my Constitution I asked the
judges this is a God in this bad yet
judge so where they got tossed in a nut
house because you defend your
Constitution he says not in my court and
I've heard of Judges speaking out and
saying well the Constitution has no
place in my courtroom how can they even
think about that wait we're that is a
that is a very serious statement
because what that judge just did in an
open court of law on your title 18
United States code section 2381 as he
just committed an act of treason
see the judge is sworn under article 11
in this state paragraph one and he will
uphold the Constitution of the United
States and move as most immediately as
is practicable defend the Constitution
and a violation of that act
would be a capital felony treason under
the people and government of the United
States of America and he would be
subject and upon conviction to be hung
by the neck that's how serious if the
defendant had a driver's license they
were trying to argue a traffic matter
and they were kind of in the system
already and raised the Constitutional
objection that the judge might say it
doesn't apply well here's here's how we
start a lot of these traffic cases and
I'll get right into that the issue when
you first walk before a traffic court
you see when they merge these courts
together in 1963 they screwed up they
they wanted to they wanted to lay off
half the judges see and they only wanted
to have one building so what they did is
they merged the traffic court per se or
the or that docket into the criminal
court docket
and when they did that they didn't check
the rules
you see and when they didn't check the
rules they didn't allow for
jurisdictional challenges between the
two courts
so what happens now is
you come before the court and there's
several ways you can come before the
court no this gentleman here is correct
when he's talking about you have a
driver's license you have entered into a
contractual relationship with the state
in other words it's not a lawful
contract because you cannot enter into
an unlawful contract you understand it
is a contract though because it's
recognized as a contract
because you have voluntarily entered
into this contract you agreed to all of
the rules in their law book for that
contract
now this is what we call admiralty and
Maritime jurisdiction or artificial
jurisdiction
and it's a rather heavy argument going
into Erie Railroad versus Tompkins and
McCulloch versus Maryland and we'll go
into that in depth at the end of this
program but I wanted to share with you
briefly
when you sign your driver's license and
especially today
and your voters registration card you
will notice a little note right under
your signature where you agree
to the acceptance of The Duality of
citizenship of not only at the common
law but you accept the national
jurisdiction under admiralty and
Maritime jurisdiction which allows you
to be sucked into all of these Uniform
Commercial Code requirements
and this is a very serious thing you're
saying in here you don't understand it
but you just sold all your
constitutional rights down the sewer
when you sign that document so when you
sign it my honest advice and this is a
firm experience you sign the thing and
right at the end of your name you write
UD U period D period at the end of your
name and underneath your name you write
1-207 without prejudice now what that
does it says I'll be glad to accept your
uh your ridiculous privilege I don't
really need to but I will just to keep
myself from being in trouble with the
cops
and I'll tell you what we'll do we'll uh
we'll exercise our Uniform Commercial
Code caveat that allows us to keep all
of our constitutional rights in other
words my signature is not really a
signature of contract it's a signature
of convenience
that allows me to get a piece of paper
to put in my pocket for identification
purposes that allows me to sign my
checks and do whatever I got to do
but it doesn't in any way make any
admissions or confessions or require me
to participate in any of your rulebook
schemes under your admiralty or Maritime
taunting scheme now to tell you how
crazy it was I just got asked by an
attorney how he would defend
how he would defend a program
where a gentleman that he was defending
was accused of hijacking a car and that
they were claiming that because the car
is made all over the world and all over
the United States that the parts even
though they're assembled at one point
they are in what is called
the the
interstate
jurisdiction
and that because of that this current
this crime was now a federal crime you
understand this is how far reaching this
thing has gotten
and when this gentleman saying his
driver's license he had no idea that he
was entering into this thing and waving
all of his god-given constitutional
rights and that he was no longer a
common law citizen that he was actually
under admiralty and Maritime
jurisdiction now
when we pull up some of these statutory
requirements it's an interesting thing
that you brought up
but what they do is they're never these
regulations are never enacted into law
uh we'll show you something on that just
a little bit later but they're not
enacted into law they just make a
regulation and because you you
voluntarily enter into this contract
all of these regulations just come up as
enforceable to you even though you don't
know any better
now we have a Fair Credit Reporting Act
that says if you make any loan or you
get involved in any kind of a credit
relationship they got to tell you
everything about how much the interest
rate is what the payments are how long
the payments I mean they got to tell you
every single thing about the contract
and in theory
all contracts you're supposed you're
supposed to know all of the facts in
regard to the contract they just make
the contract one-sided and they figure
well these people are not that well
informed they're not real bright we'll
just get them to sign this on their
driver's license and they'll voluntarily
acquiesce into the situation and then we
can throw all of these regulations at
them and they'll never know how we we
hit them
so it's very important that you
understand when you sign something read
it for sure
if you don't understand everything
that's down there take it to somebody
and ask some questions before you sign
it
because once you sign it
it's harder to get out of
but I highly recommend everybody lose
their wallet and go down and redo their
driver's license and sign a thing UD
when you sign it and put 1-207 without a
Prejudice because right then and there
you cut off all of this admiralty and
Maritime jurisdiction and you return
back
to your contract law
of what
your common law citizen living at the
common law
and they can have their contract but
it's not enforceable why is it not
enforceable because you can state that
you signed it under duress well how do I
know that look I put UD right after my
name you period what do you think that
means under development
under the deck
that means that means under duress
when I signed this I was under duress I
didn't voluntarily sign this I had to
sign this or the cops were going to Cuff
me about the head
you see I was under threat intimidation
coercion I still believe that I have a
right to travel freely unencumbered
notice you're not driving you have a
right to travel
the customary usage of the right to
travel today as you get into car you
don't go down to 7-Eleven on your
bicycle you get your car I want to go
down and pick up a carton of milk you
get in your car another unique argument
along these lines is well judge I asked
this judge I says let me ask you a
question judge if I get in my car
the Constitution was still in effect in
full force before I got in my car right
oh yeah
now when I got in my car and I had my
gun
it was still in effect right but when I
closed the door
the Constitution was suspended and
everybody broke out laughing
how could that be
the act of getting in the car and
closing the door made the Second
Amendment unconstitutional
I said that's totally ludicrous
possibly me
you see they have passed these laws and
when they've gotten away with it for so
long
that they just it's kind of like a bank
robber that's robbed 25 banks in a row
and on the 26 is a little miff that you
getting excited man I've done this 25
times what's the big deal
now you're gonna bust me on the 26th
time and you're going to get all upset
see they've been getting away with it so
long nobody's ever taken them to the
task they feel like well I should be
able to get away with it I'm 26th time
an unconstitutional Act
wrongfully done
it doesn't matter how many times in a
row you did it it's still
unconstitutional
and the reality is a person that's
properly motivated properly trained and
properly willing to do whatever is
necessary and proper to defend the
Constitution will almost always prevail
on the merits and that's what we're
doing right now and they're sweating on
that right now
but the reality of this is and you got
to understand
the burden is on you
you want your Constitution and you damn
well better grab a hold of it and you
better hold on tight and you don't let
go for nothing
you read your Constitution you learn
your Constitution you quote your
Constitution chapter and verse
frontwards backwards upside down when
people come up to you well we want you
to take a drug test as part of your job
Go Fish
are you taking a drug test
I'm not required to prove a negative
you're required to prove a positive if
you think I'm doing something negligent
fine and you go file papers and you take
necessary precautions and what have you
and we'll go to court I says but I'm not
I'm not going to be convicted before the
fact and then I got to provide evidence
that I'm not guilty
that's the cart before the horse
that's back ass words we're not going to
do that not only that the Fifth
Amendment says I got a right not to be a
participant
in a compulsory process that's going to
make an incriminating situation to be
now I'm not nothing to hide and I'm not
even arguing from what I got to hide I'm
arguing from the fact that the right
stands and I'm exercising it
and then I usually ask some simple
questions well
if they find anything when I get fired
hell yeah
you're going to be penalized so there
are penalties
and if they find anything would I be
criminally prosecuted could be
huh
so why would you want to do some damn
stupid thing like that and give them a
piss test this guy comes up to me at the
last convention we had and they want to
take a test
that's the weather now he's uh he's got
any drugs in his system that's first of
all what's in my system is between me
and my doctor none of your damn business
I says I don't take drugs but I got
nothing to hide but I'm not going to
voluntarily enter in anything what if
your guy screws up and now you say I Got
Drugs now I can't get a job ever what
are you kidding me there's some new
hobby you just took up
I'm not going to play that game it is
not my burden to prove a negative it is
your burden to prove a positive if you
have a just claim for which relief can
be granted you go file your papers and
we'll sit down and talk
but until such time you go fish
because I'm not gonna play
I'm not required to play and I'm not
gonna play and if you fire me for the
exercise of my constitutional right I'm
going to tell you about United Miller
versus United States which says the
claiming exercise of a constitutional
rights shall not be converted into a
crime and you're doing that and you're
punishing me and if you fire me for it I
will sue your socks off and attach
everything you own Bank business and
home
now make my day that's how I feel about
it so you find another turkey to jerk
with because I'm not gonna play okay now
we want to get into some serious things
I want to get into this uh
this argument about traffic cases this
is the most practical way to deal with
traffic cases
when you are pulled over what is
happening now you got a policeman he's
conducting Discovery anything you say
can and will be held against you and if
you don't think so just keep rattling
and it'll all get written down on the
ticket I found that out toll officer you
just been waiting to get this ticket so
you can fight and beat it always be in
court ruled that word for word right on
the thing
so when these people are with you you
keep your hatch button and I mean I'm
guilty I admit it sometimes I rattle on
it's been known to happen
so I'm telling you not to do it you
button your hatch if you say anything
it's yes sir and no sir what can I do
for you and they always like to say
going a little fast weren't you
I say I neither admit or denying I leave
you your proofs
oh a lawyer yeah I'm not a lawyer but
I'm smart enough to keep my mouth shut
because I realize anything I say is
going to be putting down on your paper
and so you got a charge you make it and
I'll see you in court oh you want to go
to court oh yeah I always go to court I
fight everything Murder One
it's kind of like a hobby of mine
you know
well
let's see what we get and they walk back
to the car and they start right
or they usually come back and they say
well you're going a little fast think
about slowing down we're going to let
you go with the warning you gotta have a
good day
thank you officer you have a good day
too God bless you and keep you safe
okay courtesy I can blow their doors off
anytime I want still yes sir no sir
courtesy courtesy pays you treat people
the way you like to be treated nine
times out of ten you will benefit
you treat people like a Yahoo and you're
gonna get treated like a Yahoo yourself
so I I highly recommend courtesy as a an
effective way I had a policeman one time
tell me
you ever read a flashlight the hard way
and I looked at him and I said
quite frankly officer most of the
officers I have run into are extremely
professional and I treat them with a
great deal of courtesy and
professionalism because I respect what
they're doing and that they risk their
life every day
and at no time when I give an officer
enough
static that he would want to make need a
flashlight I mean I treat them very
cordially and I respect what they're
trying to do I don't agree with
everything they're trying to do because
some of the stuff is kind of unlawful
I said but I will give them the courtesy
they have coming
he turned to me and he said I'm sorry I
got a big mouth I didn't mean it you're
right I was out of line
see you treat people with courtesy and
nine times out of ten you can even back
down some guy that's talking a lot of
manure
but the louder you talk and the more
belligerent you talk the more louder and
the more belligerent he has to talk it's
kind of like Newton's third law of
physics every action has an opposite
opposing reaction you talk crap then
he's gotta talk crap so my advice to
people is don't do that it's unmotivated
who's doing this you or him remember the
best weapon you have is the one right
between your ears so use it
and watch your mouth don't be talking a
lot of trash to these policemen they
don't need to hear it they got a bad day
you might have a bad day
best thing to do is say yes or no sir if
you got an honest pitch go ahead if you
make my day now we've gone past that you
got the ticket what are you gonna do
well look on the ticket
see if he signed it a lot of times they
don't sign it
guess what if he didn't sign it there
ain't no sworn complaint how can you
defend against the non-sworn complaint
a lot of times the cop doesn't sign the
ticket
look open your eyes God gave you a set
of eyes look
yeah this guy didn't sign it today it
says under penalty of perjury I attest
and certify that this is a true and fat
complaint well what happens if you don't
sign that it ain't a complaint
you have to sign the ticket when the
police officer pulls you over in that
situation don't they make you sign in
Texas sometimes they do if you sign it
put UD 1-207 without prejudice
that's saying that's saying that you you
received the complaint that's all that's
saying all right so it's okay to do that
yeah but put UD
1-207 it's not an admission of guilt it
just means that you received the
complaint okay
if you don't sign it he's going to take
you to jail that's I mean I realize that
it's unconstitutional unless you like
jail food you know I wouldn't do it I'd
sign the thing UD 1-207 without
prejudice
the signature doesn't do anything
besides you want to copy the complaint
anyway because you want to file a brief
and are you going to file the brief if
you don't know what the complaint is
right
now the next thing you know you have to
notify the court within the time period
and it's usually 10 days one of their
dirtiest tricks is you call in and you
think you got it noticed and guess what
they claim you didn't call in
and they go ahead and say you didn't
show up then they find you guilty and
bingo you're out of there so I recommend
you call them tell them that you want a
formal hearing ask the name of the party
you are speaking to and who am I
speaking to so that you've got a name of
somebody that works there to verify that
you called then immediately or sooner
type up a little notice that says I
State your full name do hereby request a
formal hearing put that in the mail sent
certified mail to them
or run down there and there and walk
right in and get them to set up a
hearing now you want a formal hearing
okay now
five days before that hearing you are
required to serve your papers on
opposing Council if you don't do it in a
timely fashion Michigan General Court
rule will sock it to you and you will
not be able to enter your briefs now
sometimes you can get away with it the
last minute hand in the Tomb and they
won't say nothing but if they want to
hear me they can use the five-day Court
rule I have used it effectively several
times
you gotta
you look at what it says on the
complaint whatever it says mcoa whatever
you violated and you go down and you you
go to the law library you look up
missionary miles laws act you look up
exactly what they say and then you enter
a defend
I neither admitting there tonight I
leave you to your strictest proofs in a
kind of an accord original jurisdiction
but before we go that depending on how
you want to play and there's several
ways you can go if you want to be the
hardest nosed that you can be
you walk into court and don't send no
paper
and as soon as they call a case you as
expediently as possible you move to the
far to the to the Forum up there in the
front you say in a loud and clear voice
ready your honor you state your full
name I'm giving my appearance before the
court inappropriate Persona which means
in your own proper person in this state
it's pursuant Article 1 Section 13. I've
appointed myself my own attorney and I'm
ready to proceed with my administrator
in procedural matters and at this time
your honor me a please record I'd motion
for dismissal with prejudice Fair state
of cause of action for which relief can
be granted and all of a sudden the cop
will go especially if you wear a army
jacket and you look like you're three
sheets in the Wind
the copper lean back and go oh crap
we're going to get sued
I didn't know the guy was a lawyer and
then he'll start talking to the
prosecuting the prosecutor go that was
tricky brought me you brought me one of
them kind
of I'm gonna get killed and you're gonna
sit here and pay for it I promise you
and and then what happens is out of your
mouth you tell a judge in the most
clearest and expedient language your
honor mate please Accord is this a court
of law or is this a court of equity
he will immediately sound off with
there's no equity here just like he got
hit in the knee with a hammer and his
leg jump and just that fast it'll happen
that fast
because he thinks there's no lawsuit
here therefore there's no equity see the
judges don't even understand what
happened with this shift from 1963 where
they moved these courts together so you
got to find out what hat the judge is
wearing is he wearing a criminal hat or
is he wearing the Civil hat
so you have a right to ask
say justice court a large escort Equity
goes there's no equity here now we just
did this in a beautiful case this little
gal she couldn't have been 80 pounds
soaking wet and this cap is about six
foot two about three twenty big heavy
duty state trooper she walks in
your honor I am representing myself as
my own counsel I would like to proceed
with my administrative and procedural
matters but before we go I have a
declaratory ruling sir could I ask you a
question oh sure honey go ahead
he says but you understand only a fool
stands as his own attorney
she says that may be sir but I'm the
best person that knows the facts in my
case and I think I I have a chance I'd
like to try is that okay no problem yeah
right
is this a court of law or is this a
court of equity the judge immediately
there's no equity here
she said thank you sir she rolled up her
hand in the hand was a ticket that said
civil infraction right across the top
and she said how may we hear this civil
infraction sir
the judge did a Homer Simpson he goes
so that's where you're going with this
huh
the whole Court broke out laughing this
little gal I'm telling you she is this
tiny little thing she's just a
sweetheart
the whole Court realized the judge did a
Homer Simpson and then the judge
realized he did a Homer Simpson and then
he must have left
he goes oh honey you're not going to
pull that here today are you and she got
a little flushed she wasn't sure she
this was her first time she was a little
scared she looked over in an associate
of mine she said looked at him and he go
he gave her and he gave her the knot and
she turned she said yes I am sir and
everybody broke out laughing again
the cop goes well if they're gonna play
around
no no you got what's on the ticket
that's what's on the complaint you're
not changing the complaint after the
fact that's perjury you want me to put
you in a No you can't change the
complaint the complaint is the complaint
you signed it it's true got me if it was
15 over you should have wrote 1500
he said well I just don't want to screw
around this is just getting out of hand
I mean she was guilty
let's see she goes you're on all right
we haven't even gotten to that yet you
remember there's no jurisdiction this is
where we're at we're at no jurisdiction
it says we're right he said are we going
to go through with this now come on tell
me true she says yes I am sir I'm going
through all the way all the way to the
Supreme Court she said
and uh
the judge goes okay now we're gonna have
to set a hearing she says and I'd like a
formal hearing too sir
he said okay and I like a trial by jury
sir because the Valiant controversy is
in excess of twenty dollars pursuant to
the seventh amendment I have a right to
trial by Cherry he says yeah okay okay
we'll send you a notice it's been three
and a half weeks we got no notice we
call them every day they don't even want
to talk about this case the only reason
they said that was so all of the poor
little people in the back of the room
didn't get the idea that they could get
up there and do the same thing this
little gal did they're not gonna call
her back because they got no
jurisdiction they're not going to try
that case because she's gonna blow their
doors up
okay
now that's one of the most beautiful
texts and the fastest and one
the last time I did it it was before a
particularly obnoxious judge
and he basically said to me how many
times have you pulled this and I said no
you're honored this would be I think
this is the 12th time
he said ah go on for Lucky 13 eh
he said this is very clever he says but
I'm gonna give you some advice young man
don't ever get caught doing nothing in
my town got me
sir I never do anything I'm trying to be
a regular gentleman he said well you
better not get caught doing nothing
because I will Hammer your tail
and I said does that mean the case is
dismissed your honor he says it's
dismissed you're out of here
now I'm telling you this works and it
works real good now the next effective
step that you can do is you can turn
around and ask the judge if he's a
licensed attorney to practice law
because none of the judges are licensed
take my word for it Michigan
Constitution says under the judicature
act that they are required by law to
have a license that they are required to
be licensed by the state of Michigan the
state of Michigan does not license
attorneys the bar association licenses
them they give him a p p number and a
card that says yeah you're a member of
the bar association but if you call up
the bar association they will tell you
they don't give nobody a license the
state of Michigan doesn't give them a
license the buyer Association didn't
give him a license so what license could
they be talking about
Mickey Mouse license
because that's the only one that's left
the state doesn't issue one the mayor
doesn't issue one and the one they got
hanging on the wall does not a license
from the state of Michigan and the
constitution of the state of Michigan
says all judges will be licensed to
practice law before the state
and you ask them where is the guy's
license he doesn't have one
and your honor may have pleased the card
if since you don't have a license I'm
asking you to recuse yourself until we
can get a judge that has a license now a
little lady
the name of Virginia craps he's the one
that perfected this argument she's a
genius at it she's a little Spitfire if
you ever watch her in court you're
actually going to see a treat because
she has something else
she's got character she graduated a full
attorney from Wayne State University
and then she refused to join the bar
because she didn't want to compromise
her rights with their political
chicanery
and she she is a full-fledged serious
business legal person
and to hear her working court is
absolutely like listening to stradivari
work the violin
she walks in and blows her doors off
while she's on about three judges now
for the same thing she blew the first
judge out so then they sent in another
judge they moved her over to the other
side of town over and over in Berkeley
Michigan and then she walked in and she
blew that judge out of the door so then
they sent her to another judge and then
she turned around and went before the
state
the licensing commission and now they've
handed it up to the to the judicial
people of the state to try and resolve
the problem they're going to end up
dropping it the judge doesn't have a
license now it's supposed to judge could
prove he has a license which he doesn't
judge let me ask you a question under
your retirement fund isn't it the fact
that you get a certain percentage of the
rake off of all the tickets that come
before your bench
well yeah
and isn't that about forty dollars that
comes across your bench you get 18.75
oh yeah so you have a financial interest
in this matter isn't that correct
well yeah well isn't it a violation of
judicial candidate number seven you're
not supposed to have any
financial interest in any marriage it
comes before your court
I'm going to ask you to recuse yourself
for bias for your intermediate police
according and every single judge
has got it now does everybody understand
how many ways you can Hammer them just
out of the shoot without even getting
nasty
the judge don't have a license the judge
has got a personal interest in the case
for financial reasons
there is no jurisdiction to hear the
matter and I'll tell you a secret once
you challenge jurisdiction the burden
falls on the plaintiff to prove
jurisdiction see and he can't do it it
cannot be done there isn't any there is
no jurisdiction to hear a traffic ticket
in the United States of America I know
you're sitting back oh come on they've
been getting this for years
the traffic ticket is a writ of
assistance or a bill of attainer you
look in your Constitution you'll find
out billets of attainder are against the
Constitution
and it's stated at least twice that I
know all right I'm telling you you read
your Constitution there is no place for
a traffic ticket you cannot have a rid
of assistance that has civil Equity
arguments that transmit into
law penalties
they can't throw you in jail for a debt
because that's a debtor's prison we have
a constitutional argument against that
also
how do they do it cause they wants to
and because you don't know any better
that's how they do it
what if they have a card if they say
it's a court of equity
all right that's a good question very
I'm glad you're paying attention here if
they say they have a court of equity and
there is equity then you turn to them
and say thank you your honor I
appreciate your time I would like to
know who is the injured party and where
the contract is can you show me the
contract
there is no contract unless you didn't
sign your license on UD 1-207
without prejudice
where is the contract it's when you sign
for that license
so don't sign for that license unless
you put UD 1-207 without prejudice UCC
1-207
now they can't produce the contract and
if they could produce a contract you've
exercised your waiver under the contract
not to give up your constitutional
rights to travel freely unencumbered
right
and let me ask you this can you enter
into an unconstitutional contract
not lawfully the contract is voidable
for not lawful performance it has to be
a lawful contract for you to enter into
it all right now the next thing who's
the injured Perry who got injured show
me judge
the parking meter out there
another neat trick that I like to do
especially in speeding tickets is I like
to confront my accuser I always like to
call a black box that accuse me of
speeding to the stand and the judge
always gets upset
and I tell them while you're honor I
said I've been asking this policeman
here for three hours how does the black
box that he's been playing with works
and he can't tell me and we've been
through the whole stationary Mobile
radar manual from Macomb County
Community College Law Enforcement
Academy and I've asked him every
question and I don't know how he passed
the second class radio operator's
license because he doesn't know how the
damn thing works period he doesn't even
know how to set up the test to properly
test the thing in all environments I
said on top of that I said he is not the
witness he is nothing but a hearsay
witness and his testimony is
inadmissible in any court in the land
because you can't have here say he says
what the hell are you talking about I
said he did not actually accuse me that
black box with flashing lights on it
little beepers accuse me I said now if I
had a black box in here with little
lights on and and making noises and
accusing and saying he didn't speed he
didn't speed he didn't speed we know how
far that'd go right through that window
judge you throw it right out through
that window but you let this guy bring
his idiot box in with flashing lights
and be presented and his thing is
exactly by the book in an admissible in
court he can't tell me how the thing
works we've been trying for three and a
half hours to test him to see if he
knows how it worked he couldn't pass
that test to save his life and the
bottom line is I still don't think the
damn thing works and personally I want
to call Stan to confront my accuser
neurotic one section 13 paragraph five I
got it right to confront my accuser and
I'd like to confront my accuser I'm
serving a subpoena a subpoena Deuces
take him
which means bring your books and Records
too
he goes That's pretty clever I says not
only that your honor he's arguing apples
and oranges see I got a speedometer in
my car and it might be plus or minus 12
miles an hour on a factory made one a
handmade one is plus or minus six miles
an hour I said and mine's got a little
needle on it it works off a little cable
that goes in the transmission it runs
off a little gear I says it doesn't have
four decimal places and it doesn't do
space logic and all this other stuff and
shoot out a mile ahead and tell me how
fast the telephone poles are flying by
I said he's got this handy dandy Gadget
in his car that's measuring speed one
way and I got this one that's measuring
speed my way
so how could I be guilty to the extent
that his is talking about because I
don't have one of them in my car
you see the apples and the oranges here
judge it's not really a fair test is it
he goes
that's a pretty good argument you got
there
he says I'll tell you what we're gonna
do you've cost my card enough for the
day I'm going to dismiss the case what
do you think of that
fine by me your honor
but before we do I have one more
here on her he says what's that I
said you see that police officer there I
have a great deal respect for that
police officer and I don't like to see
that police officer get injured in any
capacity I personally feel that police
officer sitting in that vehicle all day
for eight hours a day getting bombarded
by high energy microwave energy is an
insult to that police officer's life to
his family I personally feel for that
police officer I wonder why these guys
are so irritable and why they don't want
to eat no food and they don't want to
jump the old lady when they go home and
I says I understand why it's because
they're being bombarded by this high
energy microwave and I said some of them
are getting cancer I says I think that
if this is an atrocity and I said I
don't think that officers should be
required to sit in that car all day
all that stickular cancer and all kind
of other problems with his life and and
just so that the city can make bucks off
of these tickets like this I says this
is an atrocity this is you don't worry
about that please man that's my job I
worry about that but I said sir if I
said I worry about him he works for me I
worry about him
I says now I've personally run tests on
this thing or we took a microwave leak
detector right from Radio Shack which
used to detect the microwave leaks on
your radar range at home and I said we
went over by the radar car he flipped
the switch out and that thing went in
the red so I know them guys are being
bombarded by high energy microwave
energy and I know that if I had a
microwave energy oven at home that was
leaking that bad I'd go in the trash
you understand because of the dangerous
hazardous energy that is being given off
by the thing
I says now you asked my police officer
here my my friend in in in in the in the
community that's going to protect me to
put a risk of cancer or something like
that on his body I said I think that's
absolutely Un-American and I'm
Protestant
he said well I'll take it under
consideration
I said and I thank you for your concern
for our police officer so that's all
right your honor is trying to be a good
citizen
so we walked out of the courtroom that
cop came alongside I mean he says I
ain't never turning that damn thing on
again
everywhere now that psychological
warfare folks that's how it works and I
was right and I was honestly trying to
help him but he told me he ain't never
turning that damn thing on again
now this happened about 1985. now
they've been publishing in the news just
in the last year you're hearing about
all these cops that are coming up with
cancer from all kind of various things
well this is why folks because they're
being bombarded by these high energy
radar guns if I was a policeman I
wouldn't turn that thing on for nothing
I'd cut the wire or anything
I'm not turning it on what do you think
of that all right a ticket I'll look in
the speedometer and I'll see how fast
the guy is going if he's going fast I'll
give him a ticket
but I'm not turning that thing up just
so I can have my hair fall out get a get
a chemotherapy treatment
I don't need that kind of stuff you
understand
I told the judge I says you got any kind
of idea what kind of power is coming off
the end of the antenna on that gun
I said for every inch that it goes past
the windshield the power curve is
squaring itself now it's reaching out a
quarter of a mile you got any kind of
idea how much power is coming off the
end of that antenna
I said that poor guy is being bombarded
with high energy microwave energy I
don't think it's right
so anyway it got dismissed in a
psychological warfare worked in most of
the cops in my area don't even have that
thing on anymore because I notice when
you go buy them my radar detector
doesn't even go off so I know that it's
effective now that's psychological
warfare It's a combination of honesty
and basically I do care about the police
officers I don't want them to be in
danger they're good police officers out
there they have a right to work and have
a safe job just like anybody else
anymore and I was upset with them when
they dumped agent orange on us somewhere
in Vietnam
I mean it's so logical okay now the
bottom line is a lot of things are going
on out here and you have to be cognizant
of what's going on and you have to be
cognizant of your rights and you have to
be willing to take the necessary and
appropriate action and you can have some
fun at it I like uh
an elder gentleman who's one of my
mentors used to small and he says uh if
you're not having fun you're not doing
it right
he says I'll submit a brief and then
he'll send it back to me and he'll tell
me all the things that are wrong with it
and I'll fix it and I'll send it right
back to him and I'll add a few more
things in there and he'll get all mad
that I fixed it and then I'll then he'll
send me back a thing telling me he
doesn't agree with it and I'll send him
back an answer telling me that's too bad
because that's the law
now you can have a lot of fun doing this
another neat thing you can do is go down
and sit in courts I highly recommend
ladies your gentlemen that don't have
anything to do for an afternoon retirees
especially get your Best gal or your
best to
uh girlfriend or boyfriend whatever it
is take two of you two safety and
numbers take to you dress in your best
suit and what have you tie or best to uh
skirt and what have you go down and sit
in the court and take a legal pad it's
to you and sit there for the day and the
left you want to sit in the left rear
side the last few in the left rear side
and just sit there and do not smile
they'll think you're from the judicial
tenure Commission
you ought to see what happens it's great
everybody gets read their rights
everybody gets treated like a human
creature it's absolutely uh
uplifting
the judge will stop what he's doing and
ask you if we're not here for anything
serious today early and I'll say you
know sir you're right just casually
observing
you're going no no no no no no no no no
no no no no why are we here today
all right sir we were just in the area
we heard that you were a real good judge
and we wanted to see you in action my
associate was driving in the area and we
stopped by to see it he says that fish
smells awful Loosely wrapped to me
now you tell me why you're here right
now honest to God sir we're just
casually observing okay all lawyers in
my Chambers shuts the court down goes in
his Chambers
now look they start trying cases in the
chambers and they started trying them in
the hallway and they were on the other
side of the clerk's office at the other
end of the hallway then they come back
and then the little girl from the
prosecutor goes on she says what's with
the Nerd Patrol a judge give her a look
that would kill
don't you do it today honey you keep
that mouth zipped these guys are from
the tenure Commission we don't want no
problems with the state you button that
hedge
I mean you can have a lot of fun my
associate was just absolutely almost in
tears he could keep her stay faced no
longer so I said sorry we're leaving hey
we got out he laughed all the way down
to the car laughed all the way down
Rochester Road to the expressway
so that's the most fun I had in my life
just sitting there in that day and
everybody was getting off guys were
getting sentences canceled guys are
getting out of jail
one guy at 2 500 worth of fines and they
got reduced to 120 or 24 dollars and
five days serve
it was 240 dollars and it was going to
be 10 days in jail but the judge turned
to me and went he says I can't throw
them in jail for a civil interaction
I knew that
so this is the last offer I'm gonna give
young man it's going to be 124 and fire
day serves that sound good to you the
lawyer turns to me says you better take
this this is the best deal you're ever
gonna get
so I'm telling you you can be effective
as Citizens and you hear him bring up
the right constitutional issues you pop
off you sound off tell them hey this is
America last time I heard me got
American flag and I pull out there
last time I heard we got Constitution
and by God we're going to keep it
forever forever anybody got a problem
with that
okay all right
I always take all my lucky charms with
me and I was one of the fellas that
served with the infamous Apache troop
for a squad or ninth year cavalry
uh we were the fellas that were in the
movie Apocalypse Now where they told you
I love the smell of napalm in the
morning and that gentleman was exactly
was exactly like that
this book is done about the Apache
Headhunters uh by a cobra Gunship pilot
by the name of Jerome Boyle who we used
to call uh Dirty Harry because he looked
just like uh
Dirty Harry
make my day we used to have that painted
on the side of his aircraft along with
Pinball Wizard and a few other things
this is a phenomenal book about a story
of uh serious Americans This is a cobra
pilot Jerry Boyle's Own Story a former
policeman arrived in Vietnam in March of
70 he went from being a FNG which I
can't tell you what that is in a church
but it's bad to a combat vet in just two
months whether rescuing down Crews
flying fiery combat missions during the
invasion of Cambodia being shot down
himself well saw War quickly turned from
a scary game of bullets rackets and
grenades to a terrifying race against
death we're just split seconds could
turn a scene of breathtaking Beauty into
one of Stark absolute Terror
he witnessed men risked their lives
daily to save others and he heard the
dreaded call taking fire taking fire
there were too often a fellow Pilot's
very last words before his chapter
became an inferno boil earned real fast
that there weren't a lot of going-home
parties for Apache troops Pilots
and when you you listen to some of this
stuff this is a cobra Pilot's life and
death experiences in Vietnam's legendary
Apache troop first of the ninth air
cavalry
this pilot was the recipient of uh he
was a California Native and former
police interventor of California among
the medals and decorations awarded him
for his service and this was kind of
typical of most of the people in this
outfit
SilverStar three distinguished land
crosses five round Stars two Army
Commendation metal surveillor he now
works as a pilot who flies in sport of
offshore operations he lives in Andrea
he lives in Ohio California with his
wife Andrea
of 20 years and to read some of the
stuff about this is absolutely
phenomenal
some of the things that get involved
I'll just read you
the closing part of this thing
to give you an idea
the Apache troop I served in wasn't part
of the army the Army was part of Apache
troop we were Mavericks but the kind of
team that any commander with hair on his
tailpipe would want his unit to be like
if you couldn't get what you needed to
accomplish the mission through normal
channels we beg borrowed or stole it
usually the latter
with few exceptions I'd follow the men
of Apache troop into hell no one full
well sooner or later someone from the
blues the whites the Reds to lift the
tune of the mess section would emerge
from a smoking hole dragging the dead
smoldering ass of the devil
now he kind of exaggerates a little bit
but I can tell you that these men were
phenomenal phenomenal
Fighters and it was my great privilege
to serve with them and when I go to
court I take oh
of my battle stuff my my Ranger stuff my
first year cab this is from the Apache
troop logo there's my flight Wings the
action ones I wore this is the first of
the ninth logo that was put on the nose
of all the aircraft
there's the first there's first 75th
infantry Rangers
I have my duty honor country uh
coin from the uh
MacArthur group of people it's a special
group of people that defend the
Constitution it's a silver coin that's
given as a serious
Defender group
Memento this is MacArthur and that's
solid silver
then I got all my Ranger jump stuff I
put that on there
I take my
strike like lightning sound like thunder
all my Ranger stuff that when I was in
the Rangers
and I take my first year Cavalry when I
was in Cambodia because I was with these
boys in Cambodia and locked in
my Apache Troop
that's right off of our shoulder Patches
from the Apache troop the original one I
was with the take Mighty Troy Judo Club
this is a patch they give you for
running 50 miles to save your life you
got a certain time to do it in they give
you a boot lace and a pocket knife and
if you get caught they put you in A POW
Camp and treat you like a prisoner
so it's like you got 12 hours to run 50
miles or
or you go to the pow compound and they
treat you like uh
a pow they hung my buddy up in a pit
full of poisonous snakes upside down for
about a day or two
and then this is my other patches that I
wear from from Vietnam and
Special Operations group I flew in
support of both rights and Cambodia we
used to deliver their supplies I got my
my Ranger belt buckle all these are
momentos of it
program my bronze star medal my I have
33 of these air miles I got five of
these Brown Stars I got a distinguished
flying cross Vietnamese cross again on
three 333 air metals shot down four
times left for dead twice walked out of
Cambodia with two regiments on my tail
feathers
this is the sog Special Operations group
magv that we flew in support of uh
Vogue rights and Cambodia and the
Cambodian operation I was one of the
special air Crews that was selected
personally
to fly the infamous marine sniper and
allow us to shoot that General at 800
yards
I was one of the guys that flew him in
and we wear the wings of eagles
we support the National Rifle
Association totally
you know we ain't fooling around we want
our constitution we want our Second
Amendment I am a member of Vietnam
veterans
and basically when I go to court I put
all my Lucky Charms in my pocket it kind
of drives them nuts down at the
courthouse I also have my flag
I always take my flag with me
and I have my Vietnam veterans belt
buckles and my
uh the oppresso Libre which means a
liberator of an oppression
from the special forces that was given
to me by the boys over there for helping
them you know
so all this goes in my my pockets
when I go to court
my lucky charm I call them
and it it's a little heavy
but I you know it's like
when I go I go for memory of those fine
soldiers and some of the things I'd
rather be killing Communists that's one
of the models of the paratroopers from
the charity company Ranger company
Charlie Company Rangers was the boys
that supported that parachute that that
marine sniper that shot him we
shot that General at 800 yards
so I'm a soldier soldier I've been a
soldier soldier I believe in the things
that the soldiers have done I've seen a
lot of good soldiers pay the maximum
price
uh I personally killed him in my arms
and I've listened to their last words
tell my mother tell my wife tell my
family I love them and to me the
Constitution
is a very serious document and we defend
it to the death and do not fool around
when it comes to the Constitution I've
been doing it for 25 years I am a
graduate of Project Blue Book the
special project
I also take my harmonica I have
harmonica
Project Blue Book is where they pull
their soldiers aside and taught you the
Constitution
and I always take my harmonica and I
give them hell
and we give it to him
and tell you something else your
transport story
yeah well we uh we were flying
interdiction along the Cambodian border
and we come up on the door these uh B
model Huey it was a smaller Huey and it
was uh
painted blue and silver
and all along the side of the tail boom
was white powder and I informed the
aircraft commander and he told me
he was hailing them on the hailing
frequency and he called him up and told
him the land we wanted to inspect their
cargo and they told us basically to
Blink off and die
you know who we are
my pilot told him he didn't care if he
was a man from glad he was going to land
that aircraft and we were going to
inspect his cargo
basically he told us uh
we're not Landing my pilot ordered me to
roll my guns up and he shot him down and
we went down there and we blew his
landing gear off shot it below his fuel
cell and he got the idea we weren't
fooling around he went down and landed
in the rice paddy and we inspected his
cargo and sure enough he was carrying
heroin
so the pilot gave him a choice he could
go to Long been jail with us for
Contraband trafficking or he could uh
hitchhike home baby
so he chose the hitchhike home figured
he had a chance of course we knew that
was going to be rather difficult in
Cambodia him being three foot tall or
anything they were walking and
a white man on top of that
but uh we gave him a chance and the
bottom line is he didn't want to go to
jail so
we torched his aircraft and uh we got
back in the CEO uh are you crazy and
those people are CIA they're gonna kill
you I told him make my day I said uh
they were trafficking That Dope to rgis
and uh God knows who else and as far as
I'm concerned we stuck a tomb for about
15 million and I'm just tickled if I
could do it again tomorrow I'd do it
again
that's a true story we actually did it
so
anyway to make a long story short I'm a
serious Soldier I love my country and
its Constitution and I do not compromise
when it comes to Constitution
I defend to the death that's what we do
anybody who knows about great sees the
most decorated soldier in the history of
the United States he's a very congenial
gentleman
he uh
when we worked with him in Cambodia he
was all business all business and uh we
flew his fifth Special Forces people all
over for whatever Recon missions they
had and
um they they got to work with us and
they know we were pretty serious folks
and uh
I personally think uh Bob writes is
going to be painted as some Desperado no
matter what he does only because he is a
is uh associated with the avant-garde
type of constitutional defense he was
the guy that got the Ruby
Ridge Manor resolved peacefully
um
clearly he went into to save Randy
Weaver because Randy Weaver used to be
one of his boys on the team
and uh it took I mean he was risking his
own life they could have just as easily
dispatched him too
so he's a man of great courage I respect
uh
what he's doing I appreciate that he's
trying to make things happen but I also
know that he's going to be held in some
type of villainous to
no matter what he does people are going
to not understand and they're going to
be afraid and of course the newspapers
will continue to paint him as uh
whatever Boogeyman in the closet they
can
all right we're gonna go on with our
programming here we just got a little
off the track there just a little bit
just to kind of let you give an idea
where we're coming from
we uh we take a pretty serious attack on
the Constitution and
we want to get into some other issues we
want to get into uh
things like
things like money money money money
money money money and one of the best
tapes you can get
it's from a gentleman uh we call him
Ernie uh
he uh basically is known throughout the
movement around here he delivers all the
tapes and what have you and he has a
tape called
wake up America
and basically it starts telling you how
money works and why it works and what
they're doing with our money
and when you're done
you really understand what's going on
but we want to share some things with
you about the money when we got a good
story to tell you too
but basically we want to share with you
right now in Michigan the Michigan
compile laws
21.153 Michigan compile laws act
obligations do state or municipality and
date operative when paid by check or
legal tender
whenever any check or Bank draft shall
be tendered for the payment of any debt
taxes or other obligation due the state
or to any municipality they're in such
check draft shall operate as a payment
made on the date the check or draft was
received and accepted by the receiving
officer if it shall be paid on the
presentation without deduction for
exchange or cost of collection
all agencies of the state of Michigan
share a request that checks tendered in
payment of an obligation do the state
shall be made payable to
the state of Michigan no receiving
officer shall be required to receive in
payment of any debt taxes or other
obligation collectible or receivable by
him any tender
other than gold or silver coin of the
United States the United States Treasury
notes which you can't get today
gold certificates which you can't get
today's silver certificates which you
can't get today or other Federal Reserve
Bank notes and there's no Bank notes in
circulation there's Federal Reserve
notes but there's no federal reserve
banknotes
now the reality is by this fact you are
specifically precluded from tendering
lawfully without being a party to a
felony that of the basement of the coin
in the realm against the 1792 coinage
act the Sherman coinage Act
so Roger Sherman wrote a book about this
and
it tells you all about coinage in the
debasement of the coin of the realm
and that's why he is affiliated with the
1792 coinage act now the reality to this
is
what has been going on over a period of
time is they've been playing games with
the money
as we can see right here
we have right here a silver certificate
this certifies that there is on deposit
in the treasury of the United States one
dollar right
of silver all right
one dollar in silver payable to the
bearer on demand now we had a little
time we got together we had some of
these notes we had some gold certificate
notes
also we got one here that says uh
hmm we got one here that says uh United
States note the United States of America
now notice the difference here folks
this one just says this node is legal
tender for all debts public and private
but we know that that's a lie because
Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution
says nothing but gold and silver coin
shall be made a tender in payment of
debt
now this is going to bring up a real
interesting case that we got here
now we went down to the Federal Reserve
Bank and we took five hundred dollars
worth of these are silver certificates
here but we took gold certificates 20
gold pieces we had 500 rifling we went
in this Federal Reserve Bank in
I walked up to the window and I said I'm
the bearer on demand and lawful money of
accounting the United States Government
Center I said I I said I want my gold I
handed her the notes she looked at me
and she says sir we don't have any gold
I said are you trying to tell me to
spank us overextended
everybody looks you can't come in here
and do that sir you're gonna get a run
on a band guys some I'm asking you for
my gold I'm the bearer I am hearing
before you demanding it says pay to the
bearer I'm the man and a lot of money in
the county United States government 20
is gold I got 500 worth of these and
I'll take 20 gold pieces
we don't have any gold
are you trying to tell me this bank is
overextended
so they called the SWAT team this
Lieutenant comes around up and all these
guys got rifles and they're all the Port
Arms
and the lieutenant walks up to me says
all right what the hell is going on here
so I explained to him I said sir I am
the bearer on demand in lawful money of
a county United States government I'm
hearing before this bank this is a
waffle Bank of the government and I'm
asking you I'm asking them to pay me the
bear on demand my twenty dollars and
goal for every one of these 20 gold
demand deposit the notes that I have and
I have up to 500 worth and I just asked
her for the gold she told me she doesn't
have any gold I tried to tell her you
tell me the spank silver extended she
told me you can't come in here and do
that and the next thing you know you
show up
the lieutenant looked at me so once you
get the guy his gold
come on guys we're out of here so they
left
they couldn't give me my gold because
they ain't got any gold
but there is a contract on here that
says pay to the bear on demand
now on this one it's a dollar silver
in theory
the contract is there and you could in
theory go collect it but if I'm trying
to collect it
there is no gold there is no silver they
don't have any now over a period a long
period of time in barter we have slowly
been
pushed into a position of of
impossibility to perform
now can the Hat check be the Hat
can you walk in and check your hat and
get a hat check
and then when you come back to get your
head back
they hand you another hand check can you
wear the hat check obviously not so
obviously the note
is not the dollar
all it is is the promise to pay a dollar
does everybody understand that and what
has happened over a long period of time
in customer uses is the people have been
hoodwinked into thinking that they have
money dollars there are no dollars
dollars unit of measurement
which brings up a very famous case the
case of Montgomery Wards versus Eugene
glacier for those of you who want to
order the case we'll be happy to give
you the court case numbers let me take
this off so it doesn't reflect too much
this is a very famous case okay
the docket number is
82-002087 this is before The Honorable
District Court of 52nd 3rd District
Court the judge of the record was the
honorable James P Sheehy okay
now I'll give you a little synopsis of
this case what happened in this case
did everybody get the court number first
though eight two dash zero zero two zero
eight seven
all right now
what happened in this case to make a
long story short
this gentleman's wife got a little mad
at him decided to take his credit card
and go out and charge to Montgomery
Wards from the front door to the back
door and he ran up quite a large sum
debt
the matter got of course Montgomery
Awards wasn't going to take it back you
bought it to church you got it now they
went to court and uh came up before the
the famous judge James P Sheehy of 52nd
Third District Court who by the way is a
very excellent judge very knowledgeable
very very
a decent man a kindly man and he's
pretty serious business though if you're
screwing around he's gonna Hammer you
but most of the time he's uh quite
congenial and kind of a lot of fun too
but it came up before his court and up
jumped the devil in the deep blue sea
and they're starting to arguing the
judge saying well let me ask you a
question he said you get a credit card
he said yeah so you signed for the
credit card he said yeah
so you get a credit card to your wife he
said yeah he said here's the bill you
pay
he says okay judge now let me explain
something to you you told me
that the judgment is for this amount is
that right and I'm asking you and you
told me it's this many dollars and I'm
asking you for a determination of the
dollars what what dollars he said sir
you can interpret it any way you want
you can make a frankincense or mirror I
don't care
I don't care if you don't even pay his
judgment I'll tell you what don't pay it
there's a lot of documents in the
basement they never pay him
so don't pay it we'll just take judgment
against you and we'll attach it you know
whatever we need for evidence of
attachment and what we're going to
collect on this debt he said sir you
misunderstand my point now you you have
told me uh this amount of dollars
and and I'm I'm confused here I need to
know something about these dollars he
says well he said let me clarify it for
you I've entered a judgment against you
for the amount due all right he said yes
sir but if I ask you for a pound of
something you're going to say a pound of
what if I ask you for a gallon or
something you're going to say a gallon
of what and if I ask you for a foot or a
yard or something you're going to say a
foot or a yard or what now you're coming
to me and telling me dollars and I'm
asking you dollars of what because
dollar is a unit of measurement he said
you can make it anything you want tell
you what making coffee beans
now at that instant
the Montgomery Wards attorney came to a
half rise and he went
your honor all right
there was 40 of us Plus in the court we
sat here and all we could do was go
because we realized instantly what this
judge just did he had made a
determination of the substance of the
money of accounting the United States
government pursuant to Coffee Beans
with great Courage the honorable Judge
James PC had made a determination if the
substance of the money of account in the
United States government was coffee
beans that's what we told the Wall
Street Journal and all the newspapers
and television stations that would
listen
he was most upset about that
instantly the judge looked across the
room we're all sitting with our jaw on
the ground
and he lean back in his chair flipped
his pencil in the air and he said ah s
with a hit on the record
he realized that a landmark machine
Court decision had occurred he realized
that Montgomery Wards wasn't going to
say nothing
because they won they ain't gonna appeal
they won they were they gonna appeal you
won you won you won you won it's nothing
to appeal we weren't gonna peel because
we won two we got the judge to make a
determination if the substance of the
money of accounting the United States
government was coffee beans you can see
in the back of this book here
Mr Glacier took the Judgment right here
and this was for
1098.97 he did it in 100 bean bags
certified one bean to the dollar
and 97 100 so we cut the tip of the bean
off painted a white line on it he sent
it to Montgomery Wards we got it on
there
please find enclosed in this package
1100
148 coffee beans which is payment in
full pursuant to judge of the 52nd
District Court October 8 1982 before his
honorable Judge James PC I think it
served your time travel concerning this
matter most graciously yours truly Asian
Glacier and a certified mail sent to him
they never said nothing nor would they
nor could they
he honored the stipulation of the judge
okay
now to this date this gentleman comes to
court with a big red bag marble bag
full of coffee beans that he's got
stenciled on the side jeans beans
I'll read you the last statement it's
this kind of hilarious you
therefore really out of his own
testimony it seems to me that judgment
really is unavoidable in that amount
thank you you're out of the Court
anything else sir you have the right to
a closing argument Mr Glacier only that
I don't think I received a fair and
incredible trial here today to court
this is a closing argument regarding
this trial okay as to the subject matter
Mr Glacier subject matter I have nothing
to add to the subject matter here the
court the court makes the following
finding effects that the court finds a
pursuant to plants exhibit number one
that Mr Glacier Eugene Glacier entered
into a contract with Montgomery Wards
and the company which it is a monthly
account
two pursuant to plants exhibit number
two that the account was used by
probably 95 99 of the time of the
purchases by his wife
while they were married number three
that for Testimony Mr Davis doesn't
worry about a testimony Mr Davis and the
balance owing on the account is 1098.97
and the cord also finds that Mr Grossman
Mr Grossman's excuse me for Mr glacier's
testimony that he just recently got
divorced by cleanly August 24 1981 and
that divorce proceeding he accepted the
liability to on this account as between
he and his wife based upon the
information the court makes a conclusion
of law that Mr Eugene Glacier the kind
of this matter owes Montgomery award
1988.97 Court finds a judgment in favor
of plaintiff in the amount of plus costs
Mr Glacier you have a right to appeal us
and that appeal I think is in 15 or 20
days Mr gross Mr goes from 20 you're
under 21 actually out of County 23.
I think it's 20 all over now you're
under the court I think it is it used to
be 15 in some cases and 20 on others and
I could never keep it straight but I
think it's 20. you have a right to
appeal in 20 days if you appeal let me
explain to you how you do that you have
the file with the court the circuit
claim of appeal are those the ones that
are marked by the way those exhibits Mr
Grossman oh yes sir Uranus that's right
the cart
we better keep those you can give him a
copy of the other one spider but away
you can file a claim of appeal with a
circuit court in this court you also
make a request to the court snoring for
copy of the record a copy the record
must file within a certain amount of
time that you can tell you you must file
as I say a claim of appeal and then you
have a certain number of days after that
to file your bill okay claim of appeal
is nothing more
and a little farm I hear by Clan field
okay so but some but the court clerks
can give you more information but if you
don't file an appeal within 20 days
you've lost your right for an appeal any
other questions before your court
recesses I'd still like to have a motion
for a more definite statement dollars of
what am I do I own accord dollars of
what the court
the court has made it now this is this
is after he had already told him dollars
of what before
and the judge told him frankincense and
myrrh
and then he kept hammering away at this
taois or what and the court lost its
cool the court has made a judgment of
1098.97 and however you interpret that
sir if you want that and coffee beans
that's okay with me really
okay thank you much and at that point we
all went oh
[Applause]
and he went oh s with a hit he realized
he threw his pencil up in here
now this is a magnificent case and an
example
and to this day this gentleman still
pays Court judgments with coffee beans
and if the viable case you can use the
case as a reference uh
it's a landmark Michigan we use it
thoroughly okay
now
to make a long story short
article one section 10 of the
Constitution is clear and specific
says nothing but gold and silver coin
shall be made a tenure in payment of
debt
we got Article 1 Section 10 right here
for those of you who are looking for no
bill of attainder or expose facto law
shall be passed that's traffic tickets
folks a bill of attainder is a traffic
ticket can you see that right here
no bill of attainder or ex post facto
law shall be passed no capitation or
other Direct Tax shall be laid unless by
the rule of apportionment or census D
we'll we'll talk about that later that's
another heavy one
all right but article one section 10
is basically no State shall make
anything but gold and silver coin a
tender and payment of debt
all right here we go here we go
right here
no State show enter into any treaty
Alliance or Confederation Grant letters
of Mark and reprisal
a letter of Mark or reprisal is like
your brothers
messed with the king so the king is
going to attack your family and put
letter of Mark out on them
coin money
emit bills of credit what is a Federal
Reserve Note
make anything but gold and silver coin a
tender in payment of debts why because
it creates inflation you got to
understand that
paper money
if you can't redeem every piece of paper
in a society the amount that you can't
redeem is inflation or credit credit is
inflation right pass any bill of
attainder huh what is the Bill of
attainer again
a traffic ticket exposed facto law or
law impairing the obligation of
contracts or Grant any title of nobility
when they give These Guys these gun
permits because they got three thousand
dollars in their pocket and they're a
rich businessman isn't that a title and
nobility because they get more rights
they're more politically correct than
you they have rights you see I mean they
violate so many things that's not funny
it's never funny but I'm just saying I I
mean you started reading this book folks
I mean I read it all the time and I
always find something new this is kind
of a book like the Bible it's one of
these books you can read and find
something out of it all the time
the bottom line is you read the
Constitution and you you holler you
don't let these people Jam your
Constitution you keep going
all right all right now let's let's talk
about let's talk about trees in here
let's put this down here what is treason
Title 18 this is this is the penal code
and we're talking about treason whoever
owing allegiance to the United States
Levy's war against them
or adheres to their enemies giving them
Aid and comfort within the United States
or elsewhere is guilty of treason and
shall suffer death
or shall be imprisoned not less than
five years and or fine not less than a
ten thousand dollars and shall be
impeachable of holding any office under
the United States right
after this section it gives you all the
reasons of how you can be charged with
treason but the basic issues come under
adheres to their enemies giving them Aid
and comfort now breaking down the laws
of our country has also been construed
as giving the enemies Aid in Comfort
so if they're violating their oath of
office and they're not upholding the
Constitution
that is treason
because in so doing they create Anarchy
In the Land
and then that they aid the enemies of
our country does that make legal sense
to you all right here we go
you want to talk about Title 20 22
United States code section
20286 A
basically the part that we want to talk
about is the the governors and executive
directors term of office but basically
when we get over here we really want to
talk about the compensation for services
and this is title 22 United States code
section 286 a all right
okay
compensation for services no person
shall be entitled to receive any salary
or other compensation from the United
States did everybody get that from the
United States Forest Services as a
governor executive director counselor of
alternator associate
the United States executive director of
the fund what are we talking about here
the international monetary fund shall
not be compensated by the fund at a rate
in excess of the rate provided for an
individual occupying positions at level
four of the executive schedule under
Section 5315 of title V United States
code
all right the United States alternative
executive director to the fund what fund
the international monetary fund shall
not be compensated by the fund at a rate
in excess of the rate provided for an
individual occupying a position of level
five of the executive schedule under
Section 5316 of title V United States
code
the secretary of the treasurer shall
instruct the United States executive
director of the fund to present to the
fund's executive board
a comprehensive set of proposals
consistent with the maintaining high
levels
of confidence of the fund personnel and
consistent with the Articles of
agreement
with the objective of assuring that the
salaries and or other compensations
accorded fund employees who who fund
international monetary fund do not
exceed those received by persons filling
similar levels of responsibility within
the national government
you got me
service or Private Industry the
secretary shall
report these proposals right together
with any measures adopted by the funds
executive board to the Congress prior to
February 1 1979. now folks when they're
talking about the fund they're talking
about the international monetary fund
and when they're talking about being
paid people like Janet Reno who is a
governor of the fund is paid by the IMF
and who are they talking about the
Secretary of Treasury shall instruct who
now these people are paid by another
government
to our people that is a violation of our
laws
you understand
I mean if they catch a congressman on
the tank what happens he's out of there
why
because it's considered to be unethical
activity at this foreign operating
operating program this international
monetary fund is paying our officers
as executive officers
whose interest you do they serve do they
serve the United States or do they serve
the funds
does that make sense to you
okay
to me this is an act of sedition or
treason
the bottom line is they are not
operating in the best interest of the
United States of America they are
operating in their interest
and they are paid by a foreign power and
how can they sit in a office of
government in the United States of
America paid by foreign power
it's inconceivable that this is going on
now you want to find out now here we go
folks this is the brentwoods agreement
Act
and this is the agreement act that
created this problem with this title 22
United States code section 286.
[Applause]
okay
this is heavy duty folks so I remember I
showed you about treason okay
no person shall be entitled to receive
any salary or other compensation from
the United States for services as a
government executive director counselor
alternator
or associate right
Congress by law authorizes such action
neither the president nor any person or
agency show on behalf of the United
States request or consent to any change
in the quota of the United States under
article 3 section 2. the articles of
agreement of the fund the fund the
international monetary fund
all right let's pull it up here
all right they're talking about dollar
under paragraph six okay that's not what
I want I want let's see make any loan to
the fund or Bank approve the
establishment of any additional trust
fund for the special benefit of the
single member
or of a particular segment of membership
of the fund
yeah
all right let's see in order to carry
out the purposes of the decisions of
January 1962 of the executive directors
of the international
monetary fund
the secretary of the treasurer is
authorized to make loans not to exceed
to
looks like billion
yeah outstanding at any one time to the
fund if it sounds like I'm hammering on
that fund that's because I am under
article 7 section 1 sub paragraph I of
the Articles of agreement of the fund
I mean they set this thing up the
Secretary of the Treasury with the
approval of the president directly or
through such agencies as he may
designate is authorized for the account
of the fund established in this section
to deal in gold and foreign exchange and
such other instruments of credit and our
Securities as he may deem necessary to
the consistent constituent you know
consistent
and consistent with the United States
obligations in the international
monetary fund
the Secretary of the Treasury show
annually make a report on the operation
of the fund to the president and to the
Congress that makes the Secretary of
Treasury what an officer of the fund
okay
the Secretary of Treasury yeah he is
guilty the Secretary of Treasury
is authorized to issue gold certificates
in such form and in such denomination as
he may determine against any gold held
by the United States Treasury the amount
of gold certificates issued and or
outstanding show at no time exceed the
value at the legal standard provided in
section 2 of per value modification act
31 United States code
449 on the date of enactment of this
amendment of The Gold so held against
gold certificates they're in the gold
certificates
all right the amendment made by sections
two three four five six and seven of
this act shall become effective upon
entry into the force of the Amendments
approved in the resolution number 31-4
of the Board of Governors of the fund
now this is called the brentwood's
agreement act folks and this is what set
up title 22 United States code section
286a which says that these officers are
paid out of the fund
they're not paid as United States
employees
a piece
is there any doubt in your mind now who
gets paid where they don't we don't pay
them they're paid by somebody else the
fund who is the fund all those Rich guys
that are sitting over in here if they're
trying to control our country
all right now
oh also we want to show them this
these concurrent resolutions here
expressing the sense of the Congress
regarding the need for the president to
seek the Senator's advice and consent to
ratification of the United Nations
convention on the rights of the child
John Conyers is in on this he's one of
our guys too
okay
now the bottom line is
they're setting standards all right
and on these standards
whereas it is estimated that every night
in the United States at least a hundred
thousand children go to sleep homeless
whereas I mean they make all these
allegations where in the United States
has the world's largest gross national
product get American children ranked
below the top 15 nations in regard to
the health and well-being whereas in
1989 infant mortality rate for the
United States ranked 19th in the world
being Singapore or Spain I mean they
make all these allegations about the
United States
in the National Commission on children
has declared that every child in America
needs an excellent education yet
approximately 40 percent of the nation's
children are at risk of school failure
I mean they go on and on whereas the
United States two million 600 000
children were reported to be abused and
are neglected in 91.
I mean this is ridiculous whereas it's
estimated that one million 800 000
teenagers were victims of violent crime
whereas the Supreme Court has never
fully articulated the range of rights to
be accorded to children under the United
States Constitution are fully
articulated the manner and the
Constitution is applicable to minors
it is whereas the positive futures of
our families communities nations are
dependent now
you keep reading all these whereas
thank you
whereas 29 others Nations have signed
convention indicating their intention to
ratify the convention in the future
and then you get down
whereas it is essential at the United
States sign and ratify the convention
and rights of the child and begin
Implement a convention legal standards
in order to improve and protect the
lives of children believe me they're not
trying to protect the lives of children
they're trying to create a new federal
bureaucracy
whereas at the world Summit of children
in September such and such to sign the
world declaration to survival production
development of Chile which would include
commitment
to work and promote earliest possible
ratification implementation under the
United Nations and conventions of the
right of the child whereas the House of
Representatives passed the resolution in
101st Congress written president to seek
consent of the Senate to ratification of
the convention of the rights of the
child but such action having not
occurred is necessary to the Congress
employer the President should take
action on the convention now and now
they want to push it
all right
now you gotta understand folks
they're not doing this for the children
believe me they're doing it because they
want to create some new kind of problem
children tomorrow I apologize to you on
behalf of those in my time for the
things we didn't do we didn't stop the
tyrants so your fate could be prevented
we watch them steal our freedom but our
silence we consented we didn't choose to
circumvent the Doom you've not escaped
while the Bill of Rights was murdered in
the Constitution raped some of us were
lazy and too busy others too afraid to
think about our children the ones we
have betrayed we say we were too busy to
be concerned or care to try to ease the
burden of the chains we've made you wear
a debt of 17 trillion more money than
exists because we fail to heed God's
call of usury resists we could have been
good Shepherds when the wolf got in the
fold yet watched the flame of Freedom
die which leaves you in the cold
we changed our great Republic which was
forged in blood for Liberty to a
socialist welfare state which we call
democracy I'm sorry we were so timid
betrayed by a selfish generation we left
yet our remnant of a free and prosperous
Nation I'm sorry for our action like
sheep we have behaved we could have
left you Freedom instead you are
enslaved children of tomorrow
descendants of our land I am sorry we
allowed this fate you now must
understand children of tomorrow educate
yourself if by reading the Bible of
the Bible to break the chains we left
you with maintain God's ten commandments
use reason logic and Common Sense suffer
the little children to come to me for
such is the kingdom of God
Dennis Byron
has come off of the amateur radio
Freeman's bulletin board August
September 1992.
end of transmission
so I think you can see here
at one time they pretend to do all this
and yet on the other they do all that
so I thought this was very poignant
thing to put out on the air
and try and Hammer across okay
we want to cover about the 1-207
remember I told you sign your name 1-207
UCC
1-207 without prejudice this is it right
here folks
this is uh the 1-207 Uniform Commercial
Code this section provides machinery for
the continuation of performance along
the lines contemplated by the contract
what contract the bankruptcy contract
despite that's in 1933 depending all
right pending dispute by adopting the
Mercantile device of going ahead with
delivery acceptable
acceptance or payment without prejudice
under the protest under Reserve
with
reservation of all our rights
and the like
all of those all of these phrases
completely
Reserve All rights within the meaning of
this section this section therefore
contemplates that limited as well as
general reservations and acceptance
my party may be made subject to
satisfaction of our purchaser
subject to acceptance by our customer
or the like
this section does not add any new
requirement of language of reservation
we're not already required by a lot but
merely provides
a specific measure on which a party can
rely as he makes or concurs in any
interim adjustment in the course of
performance when they say performance
they're talking about contractual
performance
it does not affect or
impair the provisions of this act such
as those under which the buyers
right
remedies for defect survive acceptance
without being expressly claimed
if notice of the defect is given within
a reasonable time
nor does it disturb the policy of those
cases which restrict the effect of a
waiver of a defect to
reasonable limits under the
circumstances even though no such
reservation is expressed
now this is all what they're talking
about when you write down
without prejudice
they're telling you you have a right to
reserve your rights
so I'm telling you to use it and don't
screw around
sufficiency of the reservation any
expression can you see that
any expression indicating an intention
to preserve rights is sufficient such as
without prejudice under protest under
reservation with reservation of all our
rights under duress is another one the
code States an explicit reservation must
be made explicit
undoubtedly is used in place of Express
to indicate that the reservation must
not only be expressed but it must also
be clear
under duress
that such a reservation was intended in
advance right the term explicit as used
in UCC 1-207 means that which is so
clearly stated or distinctly set forth
that there is no doubt
as to its meaning
okay now that is the reservation I want
you to claim I want you to screw around
I want you to use your head for
something other than a hand rack
because I'm telling you
just do it yeah just do it yeah you
don't tell them nothing you sign it and
you walk out when they ask you what that
is just say that's something I put down
on my signature every time so I know
it's me
okay you you're not you didn't learn all
this stuff overnight and you're not
going to give somebody these classes
overnight believe me if you think you're
going to teach somebody this stuff all
night
you're dreaming
it takes a long time of serious study to
get to the level of where you're at and
you're not going to deliver that to
anybody overnight so my sincere advice
is don't try and do it because it ain't
going to happen in your lifetime
just sign it do what you're supposed to
do if people want to listen and you let
them listen if they don't want to listen
and you say oh well
we want to show off some of these things
under executive order of the president
all persons required to deliver honor
before May 1st 1933. try and blow that
up that's a good one that's all your
gold and silver
I want to make sure we get into all kind
of arguments here real quickly we have
some gold and silver so yes I think you
should set aside some serious money to
put in I think people shouldn't have
everything in gold and silver though I
think you should have
I think you should buy toilet paper and
I think you should buy food and I think
you should buy cough medicine and I
think you should buy laundry soap and I
think you should buy you know have some
stuff around like you would keep your
normal business and put a little bit of
gold and silver
I think you should have a pump shotgun
in your closet to defend your house I'm
not sure something yeah something to
defend your house not that you may need
it but if you do you got it
okay let's move on here we got things to
do I want to show you something else too
let's look at the very first book of
title of the United States codes
annotated and I don't care which section
you grab grab either a lawyers Edition
this title has been acted in as positive
law okay notice a little asterisk and
you come down here and all these titles
I got the little answers they're all
part of the law
Title 11 bankruptcy title 13 census
title 14 Coast Guard you know
copyrights you got crimes and criminal
procedure Title 18 right
now I want you to notice something as we
come over to title 26 here
title 26 is the Internal Revenue code
it's never been enacted in July
it's a regulation look closely title 26
and title 27. you see an asterisk there
you don't see one do you no sir that's
because there ain't one
now let's look at the other version the
other version is exactly the same and
this is the one out of the official U.S
reports for titles this title has been
enacted as well look at all the titles I
got in asterisk you'll notice again
title 26 and title 27 Zippo
no asterisk
everybody see that real clear pull it
over no asterisk obviously it's never
been enacted as law
how could it be
I'll tell you how I got a case over here
called Erie Railroad versus Tomkins and
I'm going to bring it to your attention
Gary railroad versus Tompkins is a
magnificent court case
basically what this court case did
this court case is recorded at
volume 304 United States reports section
or page 64. this is the start of the
case that's 304 volume 304 United States
reports section 604 now what this case
does is it sets up a duality of
citizenship there are the citizens that
live with the common law and there are
the citizens that live at the national
law or what is called admiralty or
Maritime jurisdiction now the way they
get away with putting this title 26 in
this title 27 out the way they do it is
they create this admiralty and Maritime
jurisdiction and if you volunteer into
it you are in it if you step in it it's
on you
okay so I'm telling you don't do that
you know what the doctor says every time
you go to the doctor you say Doc every
time I do this it hurts you know the
doctor tells you so don't do that no
more
you don't do that no more it won't hurt
right I'm telling you the same thing
applies with this don't volunteer how do
you volunteer you enter and you watch
what you sign number one any evidences
of contracts where you are an admiralty
or Maritime jurisdiction says that you
are a party
to the contract so you avoid that when
you sign that bank draft to get into
that bank and that's section 9 form you
fill out guess what look at the bottom
you signed to get into an admiralty
Maritime jurisdiction
what the hell would you want to do that
for
it's illogical when you signed up for
that social security check
so
how are we going to remedy this
situation
what an edge 207 without prejudice
you sign anything that has to do
anything when those guys take the rights
if they'll give them to you take the
benefits but make sure when you sign it
you sign it UD 1-207 then out prejudice
that makes you
a common law Citizen and when they pull
you into these courts and they claim
they have jurisdiction over you you say
the first thing out of your mouth is
your honor me it pleased the court
before this matter goes forward I wish
to state that I am here on a special
appearance as distinguished from a
general appearance and I am answering in
the form of a demure
and the mirror is an old way of pleading
it's an old-fashioned Old Country
Barrister English way of pleading
without granting jurisdiction in other
words I'll answer out of courtesy
and I'll give you an answer out of
courtesy but at no time in my granting
jurisdiction that I put on my Breeze I
State my name I State the defendant
inappropriate Persona on a special
appearance is distinguished from a
general appearance for jurisdictional
challenges now I've raised the issue of
jurisdictional challenges I'm putting on
the record it's clearly cognizant once
jurisdiction is raised the burden is on
a plaintiff to prove jurisdiction
pursuant to McNutt versus General Motors
Acceptance Corporation recorded a 56
Supreme Court 502.
says jurisdiction may never be assumed
but must be substantively proven by the
plan of claimant
they don't prove it in a timely fashion
latches and curves latches as a specie
of action or in a party of reasonable
intelligence and integrity having a
right to take an action as is prescribed
by law and having failed to timely do so
loses our right to proceed so if they
don't prove it Timely
motion to dismiss your honor Affairs
State a cause of action for which relief
can be granted and I'd kind of like to
collect my costs and fees for having to
defend this frivolous case does that
make sense to you all right now let's
get into this Erie Railroad case this is
a railroad case what it's about it's a
guy's walking down the track and the
board was hanging off the end of the
train and whacked them upside to head
he tried to sue in the state courts the
state courts uh
hammered him
so what happened was
Erie Railroader flipped around and they
tried to sue him
in the federal courts to get back at him
and they thought they were pulling a
fast one and what happened was the case
bounced back on him and guess what when
it bounced back it created a very very
dangerous thing now before this I want
you to understand that for a hundred
years the law this case was the one that
was the leading case before this and
this was called McCulloch versus
Maryland the state of Maryland this is a
very leading case this is the most heavy
case it comes in two sections that's to
touch out thick it is so you're going to
be reading for a while this case upheld
for 100 plus years practically almost
100 years this case is recorded at it's
a 1819 case it is an old case
and it upheld for years the uh single
citizenship relationship
and it deals with the corporations the
power of establishing Corporation is not
a distinct Sovereign power or end of
government but only the means of
carrying into effect other powers which
are sovereign whenever it becomes an
appropriate means of exercising any of
the powers given by the Constitution to
the government of the United Union it
may be exercised by that Governor now
basically it sets up relationships the
bank of the United States has
constitutionally a right
to establish its branches or other
offices in this discount and disposite
within any state all right the state
within which such Branch may be
established cannot without violating the
Constitution tax that Branch right now
it goes into some heavy arguments on
taxes and some other arguments on on
programming but I'm telling you here
this was the law of the land
that's probably you see these reporters
in the early this is 1819 folks that's
when this case came down so this was
going to be
you know shortly after the Constitution
was signed 1791 is when the Constitution
was signed so it's going to be an early
case all right William I go up defendant
will the new Branch normally they State
the case one place and they state it but
anyway to make a long story short
McCulloch versus Maryland is a very
heavy case it was the law of the land
and it was replaced
by
Erie Railroad versus Tompkins there is
no federal can you see that
there's no federal General common law
Congress has no power to declare
substantive rules of common law
applicable in a state whether they be
local in their nature or general whether
they be commercial law or in part of the
law of torts and no clause
in the Constitution purports to confer
such a power upon the federal courts
except in the matters governed by the
Federal Constitution or by acts of
Congress the law to be applied in any
case is the law of the state
got me
and whether the law of the state shall
be declared by its legislature in a
statute or by its highest court in a
decision not a matter of federal concern
now
in disapproving the doctrine of the
Swift versus Tyson the court does not
hold unconstitutional section 34 of the
federal Judiciary Act of 1789 or any
other act of Congress it mere title 26.
it merely declares that by applying the
doctrine of that case rights which are
reserved by the Constitution to the
several states have been invaded
invaded
that's why I didn't get away with having
title 26 without having no asterisk they
don't have to have it in law they're
claiming it's an act of Congress
and a few voluntarily entry into it
guess what you bought the whole firm a
federal court exercising jurisdiction
over such a case on the ground of
diversity of citizenship what am I
talking about diversity of citizenship
I'm talking about dual citizenship right
is not free to treat this question as
one of so-called General law
but must apply the state law
as declared by the highest state court
Swift versus Tennyson overruled
the liability of the railroad company
for the injury caused by negligent
operation of its train to its pedestrian
on a much used beaten path
on its right-of-way Interstate right
along and near the rails depends in the
absence of a federal or state statute
upon the unwritten law of the state
where the accident occurred
now what they're trying to do here is
they're trying to justify the existence
of this duality of citizenship between
[Applause]
citizen
which you are most of you and this
natural National citizen which would
fall under title 26 United States code
but I'm telling you to look up section
6331 am title 26 and you will see that
the treasurer the Secretary of Treasury
has jurisdiction only over corporations
officers or corporations and officers of
government residing in the District of
Columbia and artificial Corporation
who are contractors of the fund capiche
all right
now this is an important case if you
guys are going to be in this seriously
battling and want to argue jurisdiction
which is a very good defense and almost
anything they can pull on you you're
gonna have to read these cases Erie
Railroad versus Tompkins recorded at
304. that's volume 304 U.S page 64 is
where it starts
it's vital that you understand these
arguments I just finished battling a
United States Attorney and we were
arguing he's talking about this is all
gibberish
and I told him I said sir I don't think
you're well read on the lawn all you got
to do is read several of these cases and
they'll tell you one there is a duality
of citizenship two it has to be clearly
defined in three I have defined it and
now I'm asking you to prove that I'm not
a parody or prove that I am a party you
tell me
it's your burden you're the one making
the complaint
you make the complaint you get the
burden of proof who says so mcnut versus
General Motors Acceptance Corporation 56
Supreme Court Section 5 or page 502.
you made it you prove it okay you don't
prove it timely I motion to dismiss very
stated cause of action for which relief
can begin
and I will beat your little tail
so I would highly recommend you get to
busy and improving it
yeah
and if you think the stuff don't work
let me tell you something here
right here
right today
government came told me motion dismiss
right United States of America hereby
moves pursuant to Federal rules a
criminal procedure for leave to dismiss
the indictment in the case for the
statutes okay
no
they can't argue
in this certificate of service
order dismissing indictment which the
judge will sign
the government having moved to dismiss
the indictment in the case of this court
being fully advised and the premise it
is ordered in the indictment of B and
the hereby is dismissed with prejudice
and that the defendant's mind is
canceled it is so ordered and judged
wherefore the United States requests
that this court enter the attached order
dismissing the indictment without
prejudice but we'll figure that out
we'll fix that up
see I don't care if we go to court
because I know who's going to win
and I pray to God that he'll help me do
that
so if they want to go to court I tell
them make my day when I'm in the court
the guy says to me whoa we could get you
for an income tax evasion
and you might win one but you won't win
them all
I looked at him most commonly and I said
to him in the clearest and gracious
language I said sir
I'm going to advise you to go look in
them law books real carefully because
I'm a taster air I have had occasion to
look in them law books and I'm telling
you sir if you bring that complaint
against me I'm going to tell you to make
my day
because I'm a pretty serious fellow and
I'm not gonna fool with you I'll sue
your sacks off and attach everything you
own man business and hope so best thing
I can tell you is before you make a
complaint sir I would highly recommend
that you seriously consider the merits
of your facts before you go writing a
bunch of dribble
and when we got him today he's talking
about well your briefs are nothing but
gibberish so we asked them as well
on our proposed order to have it
dismissed you want us to put it down
there for a good gibberish shown or just
generally good car show
so he got a little red in her face and
stormed out
but the bottom line is if you know your
facts and you got your stuff together
I'm telling you people out there in TV
Land you can do this stuff all right
that is my judge I
I'm a truck driver I'm a I've been an
engineer for a while I've I'm a
fisherman a hunter and a guide
I'm a regular person I just read a lot
okay I know people like to add stuff in
the game but I'm a regular citizen of
the United States I love my country and
its Constitution
and uh
I'm not fooling around
I want them done or my Constitution and
I don't think that's too much to ask I
think a lot of fine soldiers paid for it
maybe we had a lot of Patriots some of
the finest people I've ever known have
paid for it I especially uh Tout
Donald costume who was the editor
of the constitutionalist newspaper and
these the initiator and starter of the
Justice prose movement in this area
he was a great man he was a courageous
man he was found shot to death in his
home with a bullet in his nose because
obviously he stuck his nose in places it
shouldn't had on a bin
he was a tireless defender of the people
and the Constitution
many a time we Cruise the countryside
doing meetings hither Indiana
he wore a white cowboy hat which we used
to joke about good guys wear white hats
he was an exceptional personality he
lost everything he owned fighting to the
death
[Music]
I
I especially offer
my my
serious prayers for his soul
and for the soul of all Patriots who
have suffered tremendous things to put
on this Constitution and to keep us
going
the people with the wwcr radio there
God bless you
Radio free America Tom Valentine
Bill Cooper uh
the infamous uh Jack mcland from Vampire
killer 2000 he uh
there's a serious serious Battlers out
here folks myself included there's quite
a few Patriots all around
I can't tell you the names of the people
that I feel absolutely privileged to
know because the list would be so long
here it would take another two hours
just for the tape
but I can tell you some exceptional
people and some of them are on Bond and
they can't be doing that so
so I I'm respecting their you know some
of the things the infamous Eugene May EJ
May
uh
there's just so many the infamous no tax
gym James Gordon light uh
I mean the names are endless
[Music]
um
so I'm telling you folks out here
there's a lot of good people out here
that are pulling for you that have
risked a whole lot of gone to jail have
stood out
rain protesting
[Applause]
the infamous day Franklin who was one of
the most leading arguers on
constitutional issues of admiralty and
Maritime jurisdiction
um
the outstanding uh art Morris who
published the book
the greatest Swindle ever told which is
about 4 000 pages of documentary
evidence on income tax situations
we're going to share you a couple of
arguments in the end and then we're
going to kind of close it off here
until the next time but uh
all right I want to thank you very much
for inviting me into your home and uh
hopefully we haven't bored you to tears
and at the same time you will have a new
uh love of your constitution in your
country and that you will uh push like
hell to make sure these people
understand hey this is America pal last
time I checked there's a flag on a pole
out there and it's an American flag we
don't want no blue flag out there we
want that American flag up there
and we got a constitution and we're
gonna keep it if you don't like it move
preferably someplace out of here like
Russia or other places if you like that
kind of government go for it knock
yourself out that's what that's what
free America is all about you gotta
write the
any idea you like so you don't injure
your neighbor you gotta write the Free
Speech but you can't yell fire in a
crowd of theater at me
does that make sense okay
you don't like it here move
you want you don't want to exercise your
constitutional rights that's your
prerogative but if you get abused don't
say we didn't tell you
because um
God kind of wants us to do this thing
because this is this is his holy land
and he's hoping that we're going to have
enough hair on our tail feather to do it
now I want to get into a couple other
arguments one of the things I want to
tell you about is procedure if you're
going to go to court and you're going to
be your own attorney by the way this is
the infamous no tax gym he just died God
Rest his soul
the infamous James Gordon light
I helped the gentleman do his appeal
briefs to the U.S Supreme Court and I
can tell you he was one hell of a
gentleman he can quote tragedy and hope
Quigley's tragedy and Hope from uh from
the hip from memory
and he just passed away this recently
died I want you to see how he died too
harness it says he was alone
when he died Monday
and no Services planned and they
cremated his body
he fought to the end to his last day he
was on the mark Scott program there's
another exceptional Patriot Mark Scott I
I can't speak highly enough for the
courage it takes to come on the radio
and tell God's truth
there's a lot of people like him Tommy
McIntyre uh Mike Reagan uh we could get
you a list of my long as Patriots and
come on and tell it like it is JP
McCarthy is another one that gets on
there and tells it like it is
and I remember this one casual time he
got Gus Hall on and JP said to Gus all
he says Gus don't you get tired of
losing because Gus was running for
president around the Communist Party
ticket and Gus turned to him and he said
JP what makes you think we're losing
he said we've implemented every plank of
the Communist Manifesto we just haven't
got the guns from the people yet and JP
turned to him and said yeah and you
ain't going to get them from the people
what do you think of that
well folks what do you think of that
they're working on it aren't they huh no
you're gonna go to court and you're
going to be your own attorney
you got to be Sharp you got to keep
records you go to court you write it
down you get anything in paperwork you
write it down you send them anything in
paperwork you write it down you got me
don't be screwing around on me because
I'm going to tell you some of these
things got dates and times and things
that you got to do and if you don't take
care of business guess what they ain't
going to take care of it for you you're
your own attorney
if you want if you want to be your own
attorney you got to have records you got
to keep on top of things so every time
you do something you write it down
and you make sure you can go back and
say yeah I remember on such and such a
date at such such time this happened and
this happened and this happened you can
construct a chronological order of
events okay
now also write down all important
numbers to anybody that has anything
that's got to be done
okay now what we want to get into
is we want to get into some serious
arguments on taxes
okay
and also we should tell you that if
anybody violates your rights
okay title 42 United States code section
1983. everybody got this can you see it
every person who under color of Statute
ordinance or regulation customer usage
of any state or territory or the
District of Columbia subjects or causes
to be subjected any citizen of the
United States or other person within the
jurisdiction thereof too the deprivation
of any rights privileges or immunity
secured by the Constitution and the laws
shall be liable to the party injured in
an action at law suit inequity or other
proper proceeding for the redress
for the purpose of this section any act
of Congress applicable exclusively to
the District of Columbia why do you
think they said that
because they're members of the fund
and
their they are under title 26 section 63
31a shall be considered to be a statute
of the District of Columbia
now does everybody understand about
admiralthy and Maritime jurisdiction I
know you don't but not not a little bit
they have created a duality of
citizenship under the 14th Amendment
they're claiming there is common law
rights which everybody gets their
constitution and there's National rights
where you waive all your Constitution
now which did you want
does that sound like a good deal
sounds like you're being ripped to me
and we got the 1-207 remember 1-207
right
all right now
okay
where are we in here we want to show
Jack mcglam's magnificent books too
Vampire killer 2000 and the aid in the
BET newsletter we need to get these out
to every police officer in the United
States of America they need to
understand what the heck's going on here
you get a hold of Jack mcglam and his
people at Vampire killer 2000 and they
will be happy to put this book out this
explains to your police officers exactly
what the heck's going on and they have
an aid in the BET newsletter that you
can get
let's get that out Aid in the bed Aid in
the bed police newsletter P.O box 8787
Phoenix Arizona
eight five zero sixty six right and he
has a phone number you can call him too
I think
now they have these Vampire Killers out
now tell us the police everything they
need to know
also they publish a newsletter Aid in a
bet newsletter
you want to make sure eight in the BET
okay
and get that to your police officers I
have what I like to do is when the
police officer busts me for something
what I like to do is I like to enroll
I'm going to increase subscription
and you know what he hands it out to
everybody
plus I'm doing him a service now if you
folks don't think this is serious I'm
telling you right now they're building
these work camps these
multi-jurisdictional forces and these
work camps all over notice that most of
them are coordinated between Michigan
Indiana Ohio and Wisconsin
and then they got a bunch more out here
in the Wyoming Idaho
Great West the Great West and they got
them in California
man they got these detention facilities
everybody paid attention to these
detention facilities notice where most
of them are and what they call them is
regional prisons
look at all the ones here in Michigan
Indiana and Ohio or Illinois
yeah there is I know I know I know
they prop up and they call themselves
okay and then they got battle groups
United Nations battle groups I mean
we've had reports of Russian troops
being in Michigan all summer and we've
got positive sightings by people at a
retired military Colonels and above
and we know they were at Camp Grayling
this summer
so I'm telling you folks the time to
wake up is now wake up America
before it's too late
where you lose your god-given rights to
some foreign potentate
I think that you uh you look like a
sucker
I mean you want to buy any apples off
that cart I ain't buying no apples off
that cart because I know they're all
rotten okay now we want to get into
um
the next thing we want to get into is
the militia right and then we want to
get into taxes seriously
and that'll be the close for today now
those of you who have been in militia
groups and everybody's getting all
panicky let's understand a few things
about the militia whether you like it or
not you are in the militia in the state
of Michigan
and I will tell you right where it says
that
article 17 militia right here
what does it say
this is from the night 1850 Constitution
all the way back in our state to the
Northwest Territories they treaty they
have a militia but this is an example of
what they're talking about the militia
shall be composed of all able-bodied
male citizens between the ages of 18 and
45 years except such as are Exempted by
laws of the United States and of the
state but all such citizens of any
religious denomination whatever who from
Scruples of conscience all right in
other words if you're a conscientious
objector maybe adverse to bearing arms
shall be excused there from upon such
conditions as shall be prescribed by law
and they have conscientious object
objector
status is okay then you go to the 1908
Constitution just to show you that this
is the God's truth here
1908 Michigan Constitution and the
Michigan militia show be composed of all
able-bodied male citizens between the
ages of 18 and 45 years of age except
such as are Exempted by laws of the
United States or of this state but all
such citizens of any religious
denomination who from Scruples of
conscience may be adverse to bearing
arms shall be excused there from upon
such conditions as shall be prescribed
by love okay now that's the 1908
Constitution
now you come up here now this just lets
you don't know the trend the trend here
now
we're in the 1963 Constitution
oh I wanted to show you a little diverse
thing here
this right here
common law and statutes and continuance
in Michigan the common law and the
statute law is now enforce not repugnant
to this constitution shall remain in
force until we expired by their own
limitations or a change demented
repealed so the common law is prevailing
so militia here we go I knew we've seen
it now notice folks
as the thing as the thing goes on it
gets shorter and shorter here's your
militia this is article 3 section four
the militia shall be organized equipped
and disciplined as provided by law
that's all you get now now when you look
in the beginning of this constitution
there is an there is a a empowering
statutory a phrase that says
all constitutions before everything they
had in them are carried forward to this
Constitution and that's how they're
allowed to do this
so what would happen in this case
because they haven't clearly defined it
here they would have to go back in the
law to the previous Constitution which
would be the 1908 Constitution which we
just read to you
this one right here
so this wouldn't be the militia Shelby
composable able-bodied male citizens 18
to 45 years of age so that would be the
controlling one because that's as
prescribed by law just like they say
does everybody see that
no
the bottom line here folks is a lot of
people are all upset about the militia
all the militias is concerned citizens
that are worried about their
constitution getting flushed down a
toilet
we're not putting up for that stuff
they want people to understand
that we love the Constitution we love
our country and we're not screwing
around
all right here we go
generally
the militia shall be organized equipped
and disciplined as provided by law now
let's get into that
the single section is substituted for
all of this relating to the militia in
the present 1908 Constitution remember I
told you about empowering the existing
article ties the legislature down to an
outmoded concept of what the militia
should be you believe that why our four
Fighters would be rolling over in their
grave details as to organizing women
disc winning the militia are left to the
legislative enactment in the interest of
the flexibility and future requirements
ah does that mean future requirements if
it got nasty and down and dirty we would
have our militia come back
sounds good to me
I could go for that the bottom line is
the people that know what's going around
are not screwing around they join the
militia
there we go all right cool article nine
let's pull this out the militia
organization and discipline the
legislature provided by law for
organizing and disciplining the mission
such manner as they shall deem expedient
not incompatible with the Constitution
and the laws of the United States
but they're not doing it right
the legislature should provide for
efficient discipline of the officers
Commission in that commission and that
musicians and or may provide by law for
the organization and discipline of the
volunteer companies
volunteer companies notice that
volunteer companies huh
offices of the militia shall be elected
or appointed in such manner
as the legislature shell from time to
time Direct in Shelby commissioned by
the governor
the governor shall have the power to
call forth a militia to execute the laws
of the state to suppress insurrections
and repel invasions that's what our
forefathers had in mind in the animal
issue now if they're going to invade us
they're going to change our money
they're going to shut down our
constitution that's why the militia
needs to be organized that's why you
need to be down there talking to a
militia that's why you need to be
joining the militia I don't care what
church you go to I don't care what
color national origin ethnic background
you come from you need to be down to the
mission you need to be talking to them
folks about this is the United States of
America and I will protect it and its
constitutional form of government
and by doing that if we do an
insufficient numbers most probably what
will happen is
the New World Order scammers will
realize ah the people woke up oh we
screwed up we'll have to wait another
300 years to try and Pull It Again
and let's hope that's what happens if
that isn't what happens then the militia
will defend the Republic just like what
our forefathers intended
and we will defend the Republic as we
always do with vigor
and we will have a government by
Constitution that American flag will be
on that pole out there and anybody that
wants to try something different hey
knock yourself out
but planning a very severe battle
because we will never give up the United
States of America its constitutional
government or our American flag or
American Heritage so this idea that
you're gonna wear us out tie us down
otherwise skew us around there's nothing
but a lot of who done it ain't going to
happen in your lifetime
as a matter of fact your lifetime may
not be that long either
because we try traders in this country
and the bottom line is the penalty for
treason is death
and it's not our purpose to threaten our
course or otherwise intimidate any
person but we want you to understand
that this is the United States of
America this is a country governed by
constitutional law that that
constitutional law prescribed penalties
for criminal acts and that those
criminal Acts can be punished
by a lawful means we're asking all
persons that are involved in all walks
of government are there any
areas of the law to please please please
let's get back to the Constitution and
quit screwing around let's just get back
to what's supposed to be done and quit
screwing around
pull back your Federalist Papers and
let's start reading
you're gonna find out everything that's
in this book is directly applicable
today we need to do it over
we need to get back to a gold and silver
standard we need to get back to a
serious means of trade expedience that's
going to hold the standards of our
country even we won't have this
inflation we won't have this ridiculous
Market situation
we're asking you please before God we're
asking you we want our constitution we
want it back we want all the American
principles that we stand for that our
brave soldiers died for
and we're asking you to please quit
screwing around let's get down to Brass
Texas you've been feeding the pablum to
the babies too long we're waiting
believe me we're way idiot you may not
think so but I'm here to tell you we're
way out of you
you're gonna wake up someday and you're
going to be shocked we're going to be
all standing out there smiling
because you're going to be the one
that's asleep not us
we know what we're talking about we're
not fooling around
we want you to honor our constitution
God Bless America we want you to keep us
safe we want to we want to be into the
21st century
stronger than we were in the 17th
century we're not fooling around so
please
now we can go into this book and this
book clearly establishes they never
wanted to have a militia or a standing
army they only trusted
you listen to some of these arguments in
here
okay
but it is said that the laws of the
Union are to be the supreme law of the
land what inference can be drawn from
this or what would you what would they
amount to if they were not to be Supreme
it is evident they would amount to
nothing
a law by the very meaning of the term
includes Supremacy is the rule which
those to whom it is prescribed are bound
to observe this results from every
political Association if individuals
enter into a state of society of laws of
that Society must be the Supreme
regulator of their conduct
if a number of political societies
entered into a larger political Society
the laws which the latter may enact
pursuant to the powers entrusted
entrusted
to it by its Constitution must
necessarily be Supreme over those
societies and the individuals of whom
they are composed of it would otherwise
be a mere treaty dependent on good faith
of the Prairies and not a government
which is only another word for a
political power and Supremacy but it
will not follow from this doctrine that
acts of larger society which are not
pursuant to its constitutional power but
which are invasions of the residuary
authorizes of the smaller societies will
become the supreme law of the land these
will be merely acts of versipation which
is kind of what's going on and will
deserve to be treated as such
hence we perceive of the clause which
declares the supremacy of the laws of
the Union like the one we have just
before considered only declares a truth
which flows immediately and necessarily
from the institution of the federal
government it will not I presume have
escaped observation that it expressly
confines the supremacy to laws made
pursuant to the Constitution which I
mentioned merely as an instance of
caution in the convention since the
limitation would have been to be
understood through though it had not
been expressed so a law therefore for
laying a tax for a use of the United
States would be Supreme in its nature
and could not legally be opposed or
controlled yet a law for abrogating and
preventing the collection of attacks
laid by the authority of the state
unless upon imports and exports would
not be the supreme law of the land but
under the patient of power not granted
by the Constitution as far as an
improper accumulation of taxes on the
same object might tend to render The
Collection difficult or precarious this
would be a mutual inconvenience not
arising from the superiority or defect
of the power
now we want to get into some serious
arguments here we want to go to page 108
about the middle of the page
accept this to the rule of apportionment
the United States have indefinite
discretion to make requisitions for men
and money that means they can ask but
they have no authority to raise either
by regulations extending to the
individual citizens of America
that's why we don't have a title 26 that
applies to you
the consequences of this is that though
in theory their resolution concerning
those objects are laws constitutionally
binding on the members of the Union yet
in practice they are mere
recommendations which the states observe
or disregard at their option
this is the intent of the framers
Cohen versus Virginia six week two
eighteen twenty one says this is the
exact intent is it pretty hard for you
to understand what their intent was
they never intended to have an internal
revenue ever
they hated people
that operated like that
that operated a tyranny against the
people all right let's get on with this
why is politicians will be cautious
about fettering the government with
restrictions that cannot be observed
because they know that every breach of
the fundamental laws though dictated by
necessity impairs that sacred reverence
which ought to be maintained in the
breast of rulers towards the
constitution of a country and forms a
precedent for other breaches where the
same plea of necessity does not exist at
all or is less urgent and palpable
Publius
and it teaches us in addition to the
rest how unequal parchment Provisions
are to struggle with public necessity
you know I mean you start reading you
got to read
don't sit there like a bump on a laundry
get all kind of good stuff going here I
could I could sit here and read this to
you all night
this constitution in the laws of the
United States which shall be made in
pursuant sir of and all trees made or
would show we made under the authority
of the United States shall be the
supreme law of land the judges in every
state shall be bound there by anything
in Constitution or laws of any state to
the contrary is notwithstanding
the Indiscreet Zeal of the adversaries
to the Constitution as we trade them
into an attack on this part of it as
also without which it would have been
evidently and radically defective to be
fully sensible of this we need only
suppose for a moment that the supremacy
of the state's Constitution had been
left complete with a saving clause in
their favor
in the first place as these
constitutions invest the state
legislature with absolute sovereignty in
all cases not accepted but the existing
Articles of Confederation all the
authorities contained in the proposed
Constitution remember I told you about
how they tied them together
so far as they exceed those enumerated
in the confederation
would have been annulled
see that
and the new Congress would have been
reduced to the same impotent condition
with their predecessors
I mean these people were Wise Way Beyond
their years and this talks about the
militia they never wanted to have a
standing army never
they always wanted the people to defend
by a militia they wanted the militia to
be there ready to kick tail if there
needed to be they wanted to have a Paul
Revere running down young the British
are coming the British are coming or
whoever somebody they called them
Minutemen
they call them Minutemen for a reason
because they wanted you to grab your kit
and be out on the road in a minute ready
to kick tail
and repel all borders
that's the way our forefathers thought
now they were wise men who had come from
a
a tyrannical environment in the European
market places they knew exactly what was
going on and they weren't screwing
around
and the bottom line is they were deadly
serious and they were ready to sign
their life their they pledged their life
their their future their their
fortunes and everything so that we could
have this Constitution and I think we
kind of owe them a debt because a lot of
them died miserably as poppers because
they dared to sign the Declaration of
Independence and the King went after him
with a Vengeance do you understand
now the bottom line here is we gotta we
got a duty and we're gonna finish this
thing up we want to do some stuff on
taxes and then we're gonna we're gonna
be out here we're gonna do two things on
taxes
one is going to be on Title 31 United
States code section 742 and we're going
to Rattle it off if you want the
argument later you'll have to get back
with us okay
Title 31 United States code and we're
going to quote it
except is otherwise provided by law all
stocks bonds treasury notes and other
obligations of the United States
government shall be exempt from the
state Municipal and local Authority this
exemption extends to every form of
Taxation that would require either the
obligations or the interest that you're
on or both be considered directly or
indirectly in the computation of the tax
see Memphis Bank versus state of
Tennessee at algerne notice this is
Memphis Bank versus state of Tennessee
at O'Connor
everybody got that that's recorded at
volume 459 U.S page 392.
okay right here can you see that
okay now what this case is is this is a
Supreme Court case that says the Title
31 United States code section 742 is the
supreme law of land
and it does so on a diversity of tax
arguments based on
discriminatory franchise of bond
Holdings but basically what the Supreme
Court said was Title 31 section 742 was
the supreme law of land the recorded
right in here is exactly what I just
quoted to you
right here except as otherwise provided
by law notice it says all stock spines
treasure notes and other obligations the
United States shall be exempt from State
taxation
my or understate your municipal or local
Authority now what does this mean what
are they talking about here this
exemption extends to every form of
Taxation that would require that either
the obligations or the interest you're
on are both be considered directly or
indirectly in the computation of the tax
this is a unique tax argument see when
the states went off the article one
section 10 gold and silver standard
you can't pay anyway because of Michigan
compile laws act 21.153 you cannot
tender anything other than gold a silver
coin to an officer of the government
without being a party to a felony
after that how do they figure the taxes
let's look at our property taxes this is
a big issue a lot of people get involved
with this property taxes they're tired
of being taxed right out of their home
this tax argument is specifically for
you
they come to your house they set a value
on your house they tell you that oh uh
your house is worth a hundred thousand
dollars so we're gonna tax it at a 50
percent interest which would be 50 000
that's a 50 amortization value we'll
figure your house is a fifty thousand
dollar uh bracket area and then we're
gonna go seven points on that seven
percent and or whatever the percentage
is now stop for a second here how did
they figure the value on your house
release it fifty thousand dollars there
is no dollars what dollars you ain't got
no dollars
you got dollars I ain't got no dollars
dollars or what dollars of coffee beans
I don't think so
the bottom line is they stay talking
Federal Reserve notes and they're
putting the commodity item at the at the
reserve notes now what did they just do
accepts otherwise provided by law oh
stocks bonds treasury notes what is it
what is the Federal Reserve Note it's a
treasury note
and other obligations of the United
States what what obligations title 12
section 411 says the said notes shall be
deemed to be obligations of the United
States government
whoops
now wait a minute let's see let's look
at this again except as otherwise
provided by law all stocks bonds
treasury notes and other obligations of
the United States shall be exempt from
taxation
buyer understate or municipal or local
Authority
does that mean they can't figure a tax
my use and obligation to the United
States government you're right you're
absolutely right this exemption extends
to every form of Taxation that would
require either the obligations or the
interest they're on or both be
considered directly or indirectly in the
computation of the tax
now what are they doing when they figure
this 50 amortization of value and then
they add so many points percent on and
they attack that on and then they they
say well you owe us this much
aren't they using Federal Reserve notes
indirectly they are aren't they
and they're forbidden from doing that
the Supreme Court says this is the
supreme law of land well guess what
folks
this case was originally brought in a
matter of people versus Shepherd out of
Lansing
and after that case they went in all the
law books and they pulled out Title 31
section 742 that's how scared they are
this title
and we went to Shepherd citations and we
noted that in Shepherd citations there
was no note that says a node repeat
repealed or otherwise
transferred to some other law
there's a hole there folks it starts at
seven it starts at Title 31 section 734
and then there's a hole
and then it goes to 752. what happened
here they went in all the law books and
pulled this argument out why do you
think they did that
because every state in the Union that
went off the gold and silver standard
under article one section 10 was locked
out are you taxing the citizenry in any
capacity by the use of obligations of
the United States government that's the
only thing you got in your hand folks
so rather than play that game they went
in all the law books and pulled it out
then they went and Shepherd citations
and instead of putting a note down there
as to what happened they just created a
void
what is that evidence of
fraud
does not fraud void the contract
last time I checked it did
now I want you to pay attention to this
stuff and get get locked in on this
argument and don't try this until you've
at least practiced a little bit
but anybody that's getting jammed on
their property taxes or any other taxes
for the state
lock their heels that's all I got to say
okay
now we're going to go into one last
argument on income taxes
and I'm not advising you as your
attorney I'm telling you what I have
found is a scholar
in the Lobos
I have found these arguments and if you
want to use them that's your free choice
this is America last time I checked you
ever write
another Constitution
since the Constitution in the United
States is a Supreme Lava Lamp
we got a unique argument here
it says in article one section 9
paragraph four most clearly
no capitation or other Direct Tax shall
be laid
unless by the enumeration or addition
here and before directed to be taken and
that's in article one section two Clause
2 which says income taxes and
representation shall be by apportionate
which I will show you
I like to show everybody the rules
all right go on section two Clause two
all right
so everybody's on the same way away
article one section two Clause two where
are we at here
radical one section two Clause two
representatives and direct taxes shall
be by apportionment among the several
states which may be included within the
union and according to their respective
numbers which shall be determined by
adding the whole number all right we got
the idea
article one section 9 Clause four
no capitation or other direct attacks
shall be laid unless by the proportion
to the census or enumeration as hearing
before directed to be taken well folks
they're not using the senses they're not
using a portion of an issue at all
they're evading it totally
now there's several arguments here and
it's very catchy so I want you to pay
close attention right
one of the arguments I want to share
with you is brought by an Infamous
outstanding judge
judge beers he's the gentleman that
actually lived the movie Cheaper by the
Dozen he went out and had two wives and
had 12 kids by each
man's got a lot of guts all them kids
went to college too I want to tell you
every one of them I know some of them
personally myself one of them is the
director of the law library at Oakland
Oakland County Court
excellent people
but judge beers got mad and he called up
Jimmy Carter and he told him look we
need to have a raise for our judges
because we're not keeping up with
inflation etc etc
and Jimmy told him no way Jose and so
judge beers filed in court the case of
Evans versus Gore recorded at 253 us-245
judge Evans sudar Gore of the Internal
Revenue Service because he claimed
with the Internal Revenue Service
diminished his salary during his
continuance in office
we all know
the judges of the Supreme Court inferior
Court shall hold their office during the
behavior and shall receive for their
services a valuable conversation which
shall not be diminished in your
continuance in office that's article
three paragraph one
look wait I'm sorry
let's see yeah let's see
yeah yeah article one the judicial power
of the United States shall be vested in
the Supreme Court and such inferior
courts as May from time to time ordained
and establish it judges both of the
Supreme Court inferior Court show hold
their office during good behavior and
shall receive
at stated times for their services a
compensation which shall not be
diminishing their continuous in office
well guess what your honor they
diminished my salary during my
continuous in office you'll notice that
there was no diminishment specified so
all diminishment is forbidden okay
and since all diminishment is forbidden
I am constitutionally immune from your
income taxes
Supreme Court came back and said
excellent argument the 16th Amendment
didn't create any new taxing power
whatsoever and clearly judge Evans is
immune
from income taxes based on the article 3
paragraph one
constitutional immunity so up jump the
devil in the D blue c
Jimmy Carter was most unhappy so he had
to give the judges all a raise to shut
him up
and he took his wrath out on Judge fears
and he went and published
the fact that judge beers was a bigamist
and he he kind of trashed him and got
him disbarred and thrown off the bench
which I didn't think was a very nice
thing to do at all
because judge beers was a good judge
now
how does this affect you
basically this case of evidence versus
score makes two basic statements one the
16th Amendment didn't create any new
taxing power and two there was what an
acceptable possible immunity
to the income tax right oh I said let's
go back to article 169 paragraph four
no capitation or other deck tax shall be
laid unless by the rule of enforcement
is hearing before directed to be taken
didn't I have a right to be free from a
direct tax on my property a direct tax
is one where I actually come in your
packet and I tax it
I had a right to be free from a direct
tax on my property unless by the rule of
apportionment is hearing before directly
to be taken an article one section two
clause 2.
does that mean I'm constitutionally
immune sure does
but you have to tell them and demand
that it's a direct tax you guys say it's
a direct tax on my property and what are
they going to do
they're going to come around and tell
you this is an undertale 26 this is
under title 27 and that really you're a
coal miner you're a minor of some kind
or you're a
manufacturing handgun someplace while
you ask them all right let's see the
form 4456.
they'll send you the form 4456 and sure
enough they're going to have you down
under some excise tax where they're
charging you under batf we're having
some
fraudulent claim that you're involved in
mining or something that requires an
excise tax and that for the privilege of
doing business you have to pay a fee
because you're a corporation an officer
of a corporation or you reside in a
District of Columbia now let's ask it
that's six section 6331a of the code
look up section 6331a those are the only
guys that the treasury Department can
lend me against that's the only ones
are you any of those no how could that
be
you're not any of those they can't Levy
against you if they can't Levy against
you there's no jurisdiction over you got
me does that make clear I mean if they
could Levy against you they'd have
jurisdiction now if they Levy against
you and you pay them guess what you just
gave him jurisdiction
you sign your documents you sign your
W-4 form you don't put down there like I
told you UD 1-207 without prejudice
guess what you're in
so you think
now isn't that fraud
doesn't fraud avoid the contract
you need to read folks we need to get
you down here and we need to read
there's so many beautiful arguments in
here I mean we can just Hammer them what
is income there is no income to find
anywhere in the code oh section 61a of
the code says income is Wages no it
doesn't it says section 60 61a of the
code says this is a list of sources from
which income could be derived not
necessarily is B but could be
that's compensation now think about the
word compensation look up in Black slaw
dictionary you're going to find out
compensation to make whole now if you're
out there and you painted your neighbors
burnt and he told you he'd give you 300
by by Christmas all right you paid to
burn and Christmas came and he didn't
paid 309.
when you have a loss on paper you would
wouldn't you and wouldn't you ever gain
he would wouldn't he now let's say he
pays you the three hundred dollars what
do you get do you have a loss no does he
have a gain no what happened an equal
exchange of property what happened you
changed your time of life property in
labor
for his consideration
you have
a zero zero balance you earn ahead and
he is in mind and you aren't behind and
he isn't it that is compensation that's
what it means to make whole
now what happens if he doesn't pay you
doesn't he have a gain he would have a
profit wouldn't he realize profit or
gain he got you to work for him he
didn't pay you right and you would have
a loss right does that make sense to you
the only way you would have income by
the way they Define it in Russia versus
Union Pacific and some of these other
cases Pollock versus Farmers loan and
Trust first you would have to have a
realized gain from some Source right
before the period under consideration
happen now did you get paid anymore and
then you agreed to
you didn't did you you got paid 300 you
agreed to 300 you got 300 if you got 301
dollars you had a game
and if you were a corporation an officer
Corporation and a person that reside in
the District of Columbia was an officer
of the government you'd have a
income but you're not any of those
you're not a corporation you're not an
officer Corporation you're not reside in
there in the District of Columbia as an
officer of government so you're first of
all not even in the game
second of all you didn't receive any
anything above what you bargained for
okay
so you don't have a realized profit or
gain before the period under
consideration was commenced so you don't
have any income
what you have is compensation
before it can become income it would
have to be corporate property you'd have
to be a corporation and you'd have to
have a realized profit again you don't
have that so don't tell anybody you have
income you ain't got none
every time you volunteer to get in that
you get in trouble don't volunteer
didn't they tell you that in the Army
don't volunteer
your volunteer you get the broom and you
get to drive it around the floor just
ask me I'll tell you I know
now the bottom line is this there's a
lot of things that you need to know the
biggest thing is that you need to get a
hold of
one of these books
and you need to read it cover to cover
and you need to be able to Rattle it
just like I told you
and you need to trust your God in heaven
above and whom you should put all your
trust in love
and you need to kick some tail and try
and coordinate this
program format you understand Holy Bible
we got it
you need to get with the program
we can't keep screwing around like this
folks you can't keep putting off till
tomorrow because I'm going to tell you
there ain't gonna be it tomorrow if you
keep it up you're gonna have to get
serious get hooked up on that radio
station 5.065 wwcr go down to Radio
Shack get one of them 20 DB gain
amplifiers to plug into your radio so
you can make the thing work better
plug that thing into your external
antenna it runs on a 9 volt battery put
a damn uh about a three inch strip of
coiled uh solder on the tip of the
antenna go outside throw your fishing
rod over the over the highest slim you
can when the weight comes down take a
roll of a
speaker wire 100 foot speaker where you
can get in a Radio Shack for three bucks
man three four bucks
bury the end twist it together tie it in
a loop put it on the other end of that
fishing line pull that fishing line up
in the air gets you 100 foot antenna tie
that baby off to your fence come outside
take that wire bear it off and take it
into your house and wrap it around the
antenna on that 20 DB gain amplifier you
can pick up Moscow just like wxyt radio
down across the street
you got 100 foot antenna
you put on that 20 DB gain amplifier and
you're going to have your signal
generating 20 times the force that it
would before so even if they Jam the
channel you're still going to be able to
hear okay you need to be listening to
radio free America to Jack mcland to Tom
Valentine to
to uh Bill Cooper to mark from Michigan
you know you need to get in touch
you need to get in touch with your guide
you need to get in touch with your
fellow Americans need to get down to the
militia
you need to quit screwing around sitting
on the couch watching the ball game and
the life going by and nothing's getting
done you understand
you need to get out there and hit a
couple of these patriotic meetings and
listen to some of these folks talking
that are trying to save you and your
country
and you need to start realizing that you
need to put your money where your mouth
is it's like you know put up or shut up
because I'm telling you if you don't do
something soon you're not going to have
a country what you're going to have is a
chain around your ankle and you're going
to be pissed
so I'm telling you the time is now
you know you want to be a son of Liberty
or a daughter of Liberty the time is now
do not put off till tomorrow what you
can do today because there won't be a
tomorrow if you do you'll start putting
one foot in front of the other make up
your mind you're gonna do this go get
you one of these constitutions
and Let's Get Serious Business about
America and let's bring her back to the
way she was we need to pull that baby
back into the wind and take that ship
out
leave that flag flying high and we'd
tell anybody to their to their face you
know we leave you to your proof spell
you touch my flag and
God Gonna Get You Tonight
don't touch my flag don't touch my
country don't touch my Constitution
I'm going to wish you God Bless America
we love you America I love Jack mclamb's
phrase
never to the New World Order it'll never
happen in your lifetime you got to quit
smoking that stuff it ain't no good for
you
you may think you're going to get away
with it but I'm here to tell you it
ain't going to happen in your lifetime
you just keep wishing in one hand doing
something in the other and see which one
fills up faster
you're gonna find out real quick the
United States of America is
the most serious country in the world
our people are the most generous kind
and aggressive
and I'm telling you we love our country
we love our flag we love our
Constitution and we're not giving it up
for anybody especially a bunch of Yahoo
Bankers okay
so
well let them understand let the word go
out and let them find out we're not
fooling around
so I'm going to wish you good night God
bless America long live the Constitution
God bless all the fine folks that are
standing up and be encountered God bless
all the fine soldiers
that have given their very life and are
still to this day given their life now
come on folks let's not fool around here
you go down there and you grab a hold of
one of these congressmen and let them
understand hey I don't care what about
your bill 666 you're not changing the
Fourth Amendment you're not doing
nothing you got that you want to get
elected next time you better listen up
pal we might even just charge you riding
an open court alone with an open
indictment for treason now quit screwing
around with my Constitution and this
congressman's got this idea that we
don't need the Fourth Amendment anymore
his name is Bill or William McCullum
spelled m-c-c-o-l-l-u-m
he'd like to hear from you
about
the Fourth Amendment
you need to call him and tell him do not
touch my Constitution
period
do not change the Fourth Amendment not
even a little bit we want our right to
be free from an unreasonable search
unless with a warrant duly signed by a
judge of the Court newly before a sworn
magistrate where the guy swears that
this is a true in fact case this is the
evidence to be seized the person to be
cherished and we want them to be able to
hold that right up and say
we're not changing that today sir and if
you've got a problem with that find
another job because you're fired
behind me we're all going to learn a new
term
the words now listen closely can all of
you say constructive fraud
ever get the feeling cause you're
staring at the ceiling
that this game of life is playing Fair
seems as fast as we can make it there's
a hand that grabs and takes it till they
find us in a grave somewhere like a
rodent on a treadmill keep pushing for
it I feel that we never seem to get too
far well if you think you're being taken
then you're ready to awaken through the
truth of what we really are
we're all indentured servitude old
slaves
overburdened and bewildered feudal names
who have lost our soap austerity through
ignorance and apathy and now we're being
taxed out of our dreams Carl Miller is
an expert on the Constitution United
States and the Bill of Rights he has
studied law for over 25 years and has a
courtroom win loss rate of over 90
percent he is not an attorney Carl
prefers to represent himself as he
Delights in tying Federal prosecutors in
knots often winning the praise and
respect of the judges at the same time
Carl is a highly decorated hero of the
Vietnam War serving in the elite Apache
troop as a paratrooper and crew chief
the famous movie Apocalypse Now and the
best-selling book Apache Sunrise are
based on the true life experiences of
this group of Brave and patriotic
Americans Carl Miller was inducted into
the top secret Project Blue Book and he
considers it an honor to have served in
several operations supporting Lieutenant
Colonel Beau greitz including operation
Eagle snatch Carl is a veteran of
hundreds of dangerous parachute jumps
breaking his legs or ankles six times
shot down four times personally shot
twice Carl has miraculously escaped
death numerous times Carl credit's
divine intervention in God's Providence
for the preserving of his life under
this day so that he may complete the
most important mission of his life that
of teaching others the importance of the
Constitution United States and how to
use it and by using it thus preserving
it Carl has taught hundreds of people
including Housewives and truck drivers
the Fine Art of arguing the Constitution
and winning in court Carl says it's easy
Once you know how and a whole lot of fun
too
